I was in Harvard Square today, and kept seeing all these Smart Four-Two's driving around. Which, since they don't sell them over here yet, was quite a surprise. They were launching a test drive program where they are visiting several urban areas and giving driving demonstrations of the cars. I didn't have time today for one, but they are also stopping in Hartford and Providence, so I want to try one out then.

For those of you who do not know what a Smart is, it's a very, very small car - quite literally the size of a golf cart. It makes something like the Toyota Yaris look huge! Supposedly, these can do up to 90mph, although I could not see anyone taking one of these out on the highway. They are really targeted towards urban areas. My question is: Is this a good or a bad development? We have really never had something so small available in decades. Certainly, this can be a great replacement for larger automobiles, they are much more fuel efficient, nimble, better environmentally, and can nearly park head in parallel parking spaces. But, will this convenience actually encourage more people to drive instead of taking public transit? Will they really replace cars, or actually become a second car for some people who have a full size car for highway travel and a smaller car for the city? Do programs like the ZipCar program perhaps provide an answer for this?


Um, here is a link to Smart Cars USA. I can remove it if moderators don't like the post to a commercial car site, but as I don't have a photo of what the car actually looks like...http://www.usa.smart.com/

I grew up in a New York City suburb in which much of the adult population commuted to work in Manhattan via commuter trains. In our suburb, the concept of a "station car" was well established. It was usually an old, basic car that was still dependable but not especially comfortable or fun to drive. It was generally used only to commute to and from a rail station a few miles away.

It seem that Smarts would be perfect for the "station car" role. Light rail, bus rapid transit, and commuter rail are expanding into metro areas across the country, but many potential users live too far from stations to walk. Most commuters would be justifiably nervous about driving a Smart on freeways, but might be able to drive one a few miles on neighborhood streets to a nearby park-and-ride. If enough commuters arrived at park-and-rides via Smarts, smaller parking spaces would be possible, allowing more commuters to use the facility.

They just brought a few of these cars up to my campus at the Univ of NC - Charlotte and have seen them driving up north of Charlotte for a few days now... They were doing presentations and blasting music and handing out literature on them... I don't have an opinion on these, they are goofy looking but at least they are directing the attitude of the enviornment in the right way. No- I couldn't see these taking over normal cars. A second vehicle, maybe. I don't think it will disrupt public transportation in any form.

In general, I'm all for anything that's more fuel efficient, but the key problem with the Smart is the same as the problem with hybrids. People will be less likely to walk, bike or use transit because they're barely using any fuel by driving. "Why walk and take the light rail when you can drive? After all, it's a hybrid!"

On the other hand, since the Smart ForTwo is so small and only seats two, I doubt they'll be very popular in suburban or rural areas, so the number and length of trips would likely be fewer and shorter, and they'd perpetuate less sprawl, in theory.

Here are a few images of the Smart ForTwo:

(IMG:http://www.carpages.co.uk/smart/smart_images/smart_fortwo_grandstyle_02_04_06.jpg)

(IMG:http://upload.moldova.org/auto/Smart/Smart-Fortwo_LE_One_2.jpg)

(IMG:http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/7/4/Smart_ForTwo_1.jpg)

I understand this line of reasoning, but I am wondering if that in fact is one of the reasons why mass transit doesn't work in the US so well? Because it is too much of an all or nothing approach - you either have to give everything up and take the train, or always drive.

i think this would be a great idea for the states. they were everywhere when i was in london and paris a couple of years ago. people love these things. they are eco-friendly and very manueverable in the city. i do believe it will take people a lot of time to get used to them though. i can bet there will be quite a few accidents involving these in the first few years.

I think that's a valid point. If you're a couple (since the vehicle fits only two) going out on the town for a night, why spend the $6, $7, $8 on round-trip bus or subway fare (which would probably take twice as long) when you can hop in your Smart Car and use only about 25 cents' worth of gas?

I think it's a major reason mass transit doesn't work: because in all but a handful of cities, driving is cheaper (when you ignore the hidden costs of driving) and more convenient. If you have a car, you're less likely to take transit because you've already paid for the car, the insurance, and the gas in the tank.

^^ Yup. You've already bought the car and paid for the insurance, so fuel is cheaper than the mass transit fares in a lot of cases.

I'm a fan of the Smart, but I love small cars. here are a few others if you want to consider a smaller station or city car. They are used and fairly cheap.

Honda Z600 Coupe
Fiat 850
Honda CRX, 1984-1987
Chevy Sprint
1st generation Honda Civic
Geo Metro
Scion xA
Ford Festive (you know, the turbo motor from a Mercury Capri convertible fits this car?)
MG Midget

Edit: How could I forget the Subaru Just, for you guys in the snow belt ;-)

I drove the Smart Car when they were displaying them here in Providence. They have a weird automatic/manual transmission that makes them drive a bit weird. I don't drive a stick, so I just let the manual do its thing, but there is a leaver where one can take over the transmission, don't know how it would drive for that person. Since they are quasi manual, they also act like a manual on hills, which is a learning thing for someone used to an automatic (the test drive course went up College Hill, and the person showing me the car was very quick to warn me we were gonna roll and I needed to ride the brake).

I would have no problem driving or owning one of these, but the current MSRP is crazy, its around $13k. You can get a full car such as a Toyota Yaris for th same or less (i.e. seat four and have more storage capacity).

On the storage, people kind of freak about it, it's not much, one large suitcase. You can certainly do grocery shopping, especially if you are alone in the car, you can use the passenger seat if needed, but you aren't bringing much back from IKEA or Home Depot. If you pack properly, it is fine for a long weekend.

I would own one of these, but I still don't need a car. All the reasons I don't own a car still apply. What I would like to see is rental car agencies start to carry these. I would be all over renting one for a weekend trip to the Cape to visit the 'rents or out to Western Mass where I have some friends and where public transit, sadly, doesn't cut it. These would make ideal ZipCars too.

Ok, I know some folks have worried about the size of the Smart Car... well they had several on display at the L.A. Auto Show and I decided to try one on for size. I was surprised by how well I was able to get in and out of it, plus the room I had inside of the car.. especially since I'm almost 6ft tall and a larger guy... I still don't know if I'd recommed it over the Yaris based on the pricing...

(IMG:http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i176/lilgeorge3272/LAAutoShow/PB230128.jpg)

Here is a video showing the results of a straight-on collision at high speed. I think it held up remarkably well considering the speed of the impact and the size of this car:

I saw the full demo of that, they crashed a conventional compact too, and determined that there was a high chance that the driver would not have survived either crash. But the fatality would have had to do with the deceleration, from 70 to zero in zero seconds would cause severe brain damage and no car would offer the proper protection for the crash they were doing. What they were trying to show though, is that the Smart Car and the conventional compact car both held up pretty much the same to the impact, they both had about equal amounts of intrusion into the passenger compartment.

The engine of the Smart Car is specifically set at an angle that will send it into the ground rather than into the passenger compartment upon impact.

I did a 4-month study-abroad in Italy while I was in college and these are all over Rome. They are not even the smallest cars: There are also one-seaters with three wheels that look like an enclosed motorbike.

Starting to see some on the road here...two in Raleigh already.

If anything, these will be great for dealing with urban parking issues. In Europe, I saw lots of them parked head on (or back in) perpendicularly into parallel parking spots.
I wonder if US cities will allow them to do the same here....hopefully they will. So far, the one I've seen parked here was parked normally. Guess he was afraid of being the first and some confused meter maid giving him a ticket. (IMG:http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)