<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>UP|North Carolina</title>
	<description></description>
	<link>http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 02:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest census estimates for NC MSA's]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=45789&view=findpost&p=1161848]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=45789&view=findpost&p=1161848]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1158506'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>DCMetroRaleigh, on 09 January 2012 - 06:26 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
I am anxious to see the 2011 MSA estimates.<br /></div></div>I would like to see them as well, citiboi how you been?<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>RALBOI</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tolls on I-95?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=43136&view=findpost&p=1161819]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=43136&view=findpost&p=1161819]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/02/18/1863984/feds-approve-states-plan-for-i.html#storylink=misearch' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>Tolling 95</a> will be a reality. This <a href='http://media2.newsobserver.com/smedia/2012/02/11/21/56/r0EgG.Em.156.jpg' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>map</a> breaks down how drivers will be tolled.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kdub1</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161799]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161799]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1161475'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>orulz, on 16 February 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Because there are no stations, there is no signaling on the line east of Goldsboro, who knows what CSX would have to say about the at-grade crossings of their two lines in Selma and Goldsboro, there is street running in both New Bern and Morehead which makes things more complicated and slower still, and because adding service between Raleigh and Charlotte is a higher priority, and Asheville and Wilmington are the next priorities after that due to greater population and higher ridership potential.<br />
<br />
Service to New Bern and Morehead would be nice, don't get me wrong, but implementation is much more than a matter of Patrick Simmons down at the DOT snapping his fingers trains rolling.<br /></div></div>
Following up on this, it seems Amtrak is studying the idea of a <a href='http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20120125/ARTICLES/120129774' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>Thruway bus</a> from Wilmington to Selma, to connect with the Palmetto, Carolinian, and Silver Service trains.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161479]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161479]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1161459'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>mallguy, on 16 February 2012 - 05:06 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Still not understanding why Charlotte needs a wye.  Why aren't the Piedmont and Carolinian push-pull trains yet, with a locomotive on one end and a non-powered control car on the other?<br /></div></div>
<br />
<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1161459'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>mallguy, on 16 February 2012 - 05:06 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Still not understanding why Charlotte needs a wye. Why aren't the Piedmont and Carolinian push-pull trains yet, with a locomotive on one end and a non-powered control car on the other?</div></div>
<br />
I think it's probably just a matter of "Where do we spend our capital money - rolling stock or track improvements?" and the track improvements won out. I can't imagine there's a big cost difference between building the wye and equipping every trainset with a control car.<br />
<br />
Control cars cost money to buy and maintain. NCDOT would have to either buy an old locomotive and de-power it, usually called "Cabbage" (which would be expensive) or rebuild an Amtrak Metroliner NPCU or SPV-2000 as a cab car (which would look ugly on the Piedmont and also be expensive), not to mention the additional maintenance costs.<br />
<br />
A wye is a one-time capital cost that requires comparatively little maintenance. Plus, it is probably needed by Norfolk Southern anyway, especially with their new intermodal yard at the airport.<br />
<br />
Now, when NCDOT buys brand-new trainsets for the Piedmont and/or HSR, THEN they will probably move to push-pull. But that's because a brand new trainset would be push-pull anyway.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161475]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161475]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1161460'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>ERJ170, on 16 February 2012 - 06:32 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Agreed. And I don't know why they can't allow the Piedmont, at least once a day, to go all the way to Morehead City so I can catch the rails to New BERN!!!!!<br /></div></div>
Because there are no stations, there is no signaling on the line east of Goldsboro, who knows what CSX would have to say about the at-grade crossings of their two lines in Selma and Goldsboro, there is street running in both New Bern and Morehead which makes things more complicated and slower still, and because adding service between Raleigh and Charlotte is a higher priority, and Asheville and Wilmington are the next priorities after that due to greater population and higher ridership potential.<br />
<br />
Service to New Bern and Morehead would be nice, don't get me wrong, but implementation is much more than a matter of Patrick Simmons down at the DOT snapping his fingers trains rolling.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161460]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161460]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1161459'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>mallguy, on 16 February 2012 - 05:06 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Still not understanding why Charlotte needs a wye.  Why aren't the Piedmont and Carolinian push-pull trains yet, with a locomotive on one end and a non-powered control car on the other?<br /></div></div>
<br />
Agreed. And I don't know why they can't allow the Piedmont, at least once a day, to go all the way to Morehead City so I can catch the rails to New BERN!!!!!<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ERJ170</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161459]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161459]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still not understanding why Charlotte needs a wye.  Why aren't the Piedmont and Carolinian push-pull trains yet, with a locomotive on one end and a non-powered control car on the other?<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mallguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Census: North Carolina surges to 9,656,401 residents</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1161402]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1161402]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To go a little of topic but has anyone checked out the bing video of the east coast at night from space station.  I just wanted to comment that the big three plus one metros are easily spotted as the time lapse video moves up the coast.  Most notably is the distinct 85 corridor that now actually can be seen starting from RDU all the way GSP.  The Triad doesnt show up as big as RDU although they are close in population but I must admit Charlotte shows up nicely.  As for the plus one comment Fayettville certainly surprises with a nice glow just south of Raleigh.  I cant get the link to work but the video is up now on msn.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>NcSc74</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161364]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161364]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NCDOT is currently completing the environmental documentation for the Charlotte Maintenace Facility, which will be located SW of Uptown adjacent to Charlotte Pipe and Foundry.  NCDOT is also working the Environmental documentation for the for the Mainline Track Improvements which will add an additional track from Orr Road to the Charlotte Wye east of Bill Graham Pkwy.  This project will provide the tracks necessary to access the proposed Charlotte Gateway station.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Otto</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161134]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161134]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have googled the hell out of that maintenance facility in the past and not found a lot. <a href='http://www.bytrain.org/quicklinks/reports/CRISP_MLGS_4thWard_27Sept2010.pdf' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>Here </a>is an old document that at least show the foot print, but that might have changed too. I am guessing they won't turn any dirt until all the property is aquired. Plus I am sure they will post a news release when they award the contract for it's construction.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>thetrick</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161100]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161100]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been some movement on getting Charlotte Gateway station moving: <a href='http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/print-edition/2012/02/10/pitch-for-gateway-station-in-works.html' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/print-edition/2012/02/10/pitch-for-gateway-station-in-works.html</a><br />
<br />
In summary, if everything goes well CATS, NCDOT and Mecklenburg County hope to have development partners lined up by June. This led me to wonder if there is any progress on the storage and maintance yard for the Piedmont and Carolinian near Summit ave? If memory serves this project was funded by the ARRA funds that are paying for the double tracking, I have visited the site recently but there is no evidence of site work.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kermit</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161079]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1161079]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <a href='http://www.sehsr.org/pdf/Report_020712.pdf' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>Draft Recommendation Report</a> for Raleigh to Richmond has been released by North Carolina and Virginia. This includes the recommended alternative for each section (and a bridge over Capital Boulevard).<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160756]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160756]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1160594'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>kermit, on 05 February 2012 - 01:41 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
According to this post over at rr dot net the Carolinian and two Virginia trains (one to Lynchburg and one to Newport News) are approaching profitability according to the current Amtrak five year financial plan. <a href='http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=88242&sid=ed77fea792c762ef5361afb2e392a9d0&start=60#p1014324' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.railroad....art=60#p1014324</a>  These appear to be the only trains outside the NE corridor that are close to profitability.<br />
<br />
If this indeed turns out to be accurate then I think this makes a very strong case for SEHSR. In addition, if capacity limits have caped revenue growth on the Carolinian then perhaps a second train to DC / NY would be appropriate (equipment permitting). It looks like there are quite a few people willing to pay to connect to the NE corridor by rail.<br /></div></div>
<br />
That is very encouraging information and supports what I have always thought. The Carolinan is the natural extension of the NEC and this is the way HRS should expand in this country. I really don't like the way the La Hood tossed money all around the country to these grand plans.The FL plan bombed and the CA HSR is on the verge of imploding from it's own costs. Americans need to learn what rail travel is all over again and that takes time. Natural organic growth of the existing NEC is the most logical way to procede. <br />
<br />
I'm not really that excited about super fast trains either, what we need are high average speeds, limited grade crossings and no delays. Americans will demand true high speed rail when they feel that rail ravel is an important part of their lives.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>thetrick</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160718]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160718]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1160661'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>cowboy_wilhelm, on 05 February 2012 - 10:19 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
I have been wondering about the potential of a regional <em class='bbc'>Crescent</em> service from Atlanta to Washington. This would provide riders with a daytime train between Atlanta, Upstate South Carolina, and Charlotte, a corridor that I believe has strong ridership potential that remains mostly untapped due to the current schedule. With a successful regional service from Atlanta to Charlotte and points north, this will hopefully get Georgia and South Carolina to take future SEHSR funding seriously. However, I'm not sure if it would have a negative impact on current <em class='bbc'>Crescent</em>, <em class='bbc'>Carolinian</em> and <em class='bbc'>Piedmont </em>ridership.<br />
<br />
A possible schedule, based off the current <em class='bbc'>Crescent </em>schedule and accommodating current service:<br />
<br />
Southbound	   Crescent Regional	   Northbound<br />
	 8 00A				  Washington				9 49P<br />
	 9 22A				Charlottesville			  7 05P<br />
	 1 52P				  Greensboro			   4 10P<br />
	 4 15P					Charlotte				  1 42P<br />
	 6 31P				   Greenville				10 54A<br />
	 9 43P					 Atlanta					8 00A<br />
<br />
Sorry for the whacky formatting.<br /></div></div>
<br />
This is similar to the schedule of the Southern Railway's Piedmont train in the 1970s.  It had a few coaches, a cafe car and lots of freight cars hooked onto the end.<br />
<br />
I think that increases in frequency probably cause ridership to increase at a faster rate than the growth in seat-miles.  However, the Crescent between NY and Atlanta already has capacity constraints, so perhaps some Crescent ridership would also spill over to the new train.<br />
<br />
I'm all for it.  2:15 from Charlotte-Greenville is too slow, though (for the Crescent it doesn't matter as much since it's in the middle of the night, but a day train would need to be faster).<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mallguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160693]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160693]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.foxcharlotte.com/news/local/High-Speed-Rail-Plans-Leave-Homeowners-Hopeless-138756084.html?m=y&smobile=y&clmob=y' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.foxcharlotte.com/news/local/High-Speed-Rail-Plans-Leave-Homeowners-Hopeless-138756084.html?m=y&smobile=y&clmob=y</a><br />
<br />
More negative press for high speed rail.  Yay!<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ah59396</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160661]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160661]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been wondering about the potential of a regional <em class='bbc'>Crescent</em> service from Atlanta to Washington. This would provide riders with a daytime train between Atlanta, Upstate South Carolina, and Charlotte, a corridor that I believe has strong ridership potential that remains mostly untapped due to the current schedule. With a successful regional service from Atlanta to Charlotte and points north, this will hopefully get Georgia and South Carolina to take future SEHSR funding seriously. However, I'm not sure if it would have a negative impact on current <em class='bbc'>Crescent</em>, <em class='bbc'>Carolinian</em> and <em class='bbc'>Piedmont </em>ridership.<br />
<br />
A possible schedule, based off the current <em class='bbc'>Crescent </em>schedule and accommodating current service:<br />
<br />
Southbound	   Crescent Regional	   Northbound<br />
	 8 00A				  Washington				9 49P<br />
	 9 22A				Charlottesville			  7 05P<br />
	 1 52P				  Greensboro			   4 10P<br />
	 4 15P					Charlotte				  1 42P<br />
	 6 31P				   Greenville				10 54A<br />
	 9 43P					 Atlanta					8 00A<br />
<br />
Sorry for the whacky formatting.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160594]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1160594]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to this post over at rr dot net the Carolinian and two Virginia trains (one to Lynchburg and one to Newport News) are approaching profitability according to the current Amtrak five year financial plan. <a href='http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=88242&sid=ed77fea792c762ef5361afb2e392a9d0&start=60#p1014324' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.railroad....art=60#p1014324</a>  These appear to be the only trains outside the NE corridor that are close to profitability.<br />
<br />
If this indeed turns out to be accurate then I think this makes a very strong case for SEHSR. In addition, if capacity limits have caped revenue growth on the Carolinian then perhaps a second train to DC / NY would be appropriate (equipment permitting). It looks like there are quite a few people willing to pay to connect to the NE corridor by rail.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kermit</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159569]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159569]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1159558'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>cowboy_wilhelm, on 23 January 2012 - 04:21 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
What is the eventual goal of the SEHSR between Raleigh and Charlotte? Complete grade separation and 110 mph? Or is that just planned for the Raleigh-Richmond S-Line?<br /></div></div>
To the best of my knowledge, complete separation is not in the cards for the NCRR. They may drastically reduce the number of crossings but I don't think they're really considering complete separation. Furthermore, 90mph is probably "it" for the NCRR since it's curvy and because of Norfolk Southern's demand that any passenger trains faster than 90mph be on a dedicated track.<br />
<br />
NCDOT has on their very long-term (2050) plans a 150mph line more or less on a straight line from Raleigh to Charlotte (borrowing portions of the ACWR line) which would <em class='bbc'>have</em> to be fully grade separated. Any true high-speed electrified line from Washington through Raleigh to Charlotte and Atlanta would probably follow this route.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159559]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159559]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1159385'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>ERJ170, on 20 January 2012 - 07:54 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Quick Question.. is there any way NCRR can make the line between RGH and CLT closed so that the speed can be increased to a higher speed level? I know they are double tracking it, but is that enough considering the line has to share with freight. Should it be triple tracked with a dedicated freight line and closed so the Piedmont can potentially get up to 125mp? When I traveled the rail line in Barcelona, it was completely closed and it really MOVED! It would be nice if something like that could happen on the NCRR line... just a thought..<br /></div></div>
<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1159386'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>mallguy, on 20 January 2012 - 08:04 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Yes, it could be closed off (assuming you mean eliminating grade crossings).<br />
<br />
Diesel locomotives, however, can go only 110 mph or so, so to get up to 125 mph, the line would have to be electrified, with catenary and new locomotives EDITED TO ADD and new passenger cars, as the ones that NC uses probably aren't certified for 125-mph travel.  I don't see that happening.<br /></div></div>
<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1159387'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>ERJ170, on 20 January 2012 - 08:43 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Then I say we go up to 100mph with the current equipment. That should be able to shave some time of the trip and make the time better than driving.. Just a thought..<br /></div></div>
<br />
<br />
Well, the <em class='bbc'>Northeast Regional</em> rolling stock in the <em class='bbc'>Carolinian</em> consist are used on the electrified NEC up to 125 mph. Not sure about the <em class='bbc'>Piedmont </em>equipment, though. Anything faster than that would require new rolling stock.<br />
<br />
Really, the cost/benefit ratio is best for using conventional diesel equipment and coaches at 110 mph. Most bang for your buck. Electrifying for anything less than 150 mph isn't worth it, because not enough time is saved to warrant the additional costs (or relatively low ridership along the corridor, compared to more populated regions).<br />
<br />
Even at that, the 110 mph SEHSR corridor is estimated to average 85-87 mph after full implementation, which is faster than the 70 mph average for the 150 mph <em class='bbc'>Acela Express</em> service. Just sayin'.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159558]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159558]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the eventual goal of the SEHSR between Raleigh and Charlotte? Complete grade separation and 110 mph? Or is that just planned for the Raleigh-Richmond S-Line?<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tolls on I-95?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=43136&view=findpost&p=1159503]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=43136&view=findpost&p=1159503]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='bbc_left'><span style='font-size: 12px;'><span style='font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif'><strong class='bbc'><a href='https://apps.dot.state.nc.us/pio/releases/details.aspx?r=5938' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>Environmental Assessment Approved for I-95 Improvements</a></strong></span></span></p>
<br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>The following recommendations have been made in the EA:</span></span></span></p>
<br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>•	Widen I-95 to eight lanes (four lanes in each direction) from Exit 31 to Exit 81;</span></span></span></p>
<br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>•	Widen the remaining sections of I-95 to six lanes (three lanes in each direction); </span></span></span></p>
<br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>•	Make necessary repairs to pavement;</span></span></span></p>
<br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>•	Raise and rebuild bridges;</span></span></span></p>
<br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>•	Improve interchanges; and </span></span></span></p>
<br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>•	Bring I-95 up to current safety standards for interstates.</span></span></span></p>
<br />
 <br />
<p class='bbc_left'><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'>The total cost for making these improvements to I-95 is $4.4 billion. Current funding only covers about 10 percent of the costs of these improvements. In order to cover the cost of the improvements, the EA recommends tolling the interstate. </span></span></span></p><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159498]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159498]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NCDOT is already working on a plan to close many, though not all of the grade crossings on the NCRR throughout the state. Some of the double-tracking projects funded by ARRA will include closing a lot of crossings. Notably, if I recall correctly, every single grade crossing on the NCRR in Mecklenburg will be closed or separated.<br />
<br />
Other projects, called Traffic Separation Studies (TSS), are meant to look at all the crossings in a large area and identify the best treatment at each (Closing, separation, better gates, traffic light synchronization, road changes.) There are major studies in progress right now in Durham and Wake counties and possibly elsewhere in the state. However, this will be a long term goal since the studies are funded but the improvements they recommend are not.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159387]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159387]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then I say we go up to 100mph with the current equipment. That should be able to shave some time of the trip and make the time better than driving.. Just a thought..<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ERJ170</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159386]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159386]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it could be closed off (assuming you mean eliminating grade crossings).<br />
<br />
Diesel locomotives, however, can go only 110 mph or so, so to get up to 125 mph, the line would have to be electrified, with catenary and new locomotives EDITED TO ADD and new passenger cars, as the ones that NC uses probably aren't certified for 125-mph travel.  I don't see that happening.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mallguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159385]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159385]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick Question.. is there any way NCRR can make the line between RGH and CLT closed so that the speed can be increased to a higher speed level? I know they are double tracking it, but is that enough considering the line has to share with freight. Should it be triple tracked with a dedicated freight line and closed so the Piedmont can potentially get up to 125mp? When I traveled the rail line in Barcelona, it was completely closed and it really MOVED! It would be nice if something like that could happen on the NCRR line... just a thought..<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ERJ170</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159132]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159132]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NCDOT is currently going through the environmental analysis/preliminary design phase of the project.  Based off of the requirements of the ARRA funding, the project must be completed by September 2017.  It is a very complex project and NCDOT is working its way through the process.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Otto</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159006]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1159006]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anybody know when the interchange (NS mainline and O-line bridged over CSX line in ditch) in Uptown Charlotte will be bult to eliminate the CSX-NS diamond. I know they have funding, it is a fairly large and expensive project but it is crucial to the Gateway station project and Red Line project. I can't wait until you can board a train in center city Charlotte instead of that ugly and cramped building they attempt to call a train station.<br />
Alex<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ajfunder</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest census estimates for NC MSA's]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=45789&view=findpost&p=1158506]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=45789&view=findpost&p=1158506]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am anxious to see the 2011 MSA estimates.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DCMetroRaleigh</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1158423]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1158423]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raleigh is the only station between Washington and Miami that has a private waiting area for Silver Service sleeping car passengers (Silver Star) according to the current Amtrak Atlantic Coast Service schedule.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>burt</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1158416]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1158416]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a nice editorial in the NandO on the potential of the new Raleigh station:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/01/08/1758486/moving-people-boosting-the-buzz.html' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/01/08/1758486/moving-people-boosting-the-buzz.html</a><br />
<br />
Sample quote:<br />
<br />
<p class='citation'>Quote</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>A key goal would be to replace and upgrade the current, cramped Amtrak station on Cabarrus Street. That station is simply not up to snuff for handling the load from eight daily passenger trains - a load that has made Raleigh a busier stop than Charlotte, Atlanta, Orlando or Miami.<br />
<br />
Read more here: <a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/01/08/1758486/moving-people-boosting-the-buzz.html#storylink=cpy' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/01/08/1758486/moving-people-boosting-the-buzz.html#storylink=cpy</a><br /></div></div><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kermit</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Census: North Carolina surges to 9,656,401 residents</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1158250]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1158250]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas gained more people than any other state during this period, followed by California, Florida, Georgia and North Carolina. Combined, these five states accounted for slightly more than half the nation’s total population growth.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DCMetroRaleigh</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Census: North Carolina surges to 9,656,401 residents</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1158037]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1158037]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is remarkable that NC continues to gain more people than all but four states despite a historic recession that has slowed immigration throughout the nation and internationally, and NC has the fourth highest unemployment rate in the country.  At this rate, NC will exceed 10 million people by 2015 even with a lower growth rate.  It reflects just how desireable of a place NC is to live when its growth does not depend on a robust economy.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DCMetroRaleigh</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Census: North Carolina surges to 9,656,401 residents</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1158022]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1158022]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City and county populations will be released later this year.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DCMetroRaleigh</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Census: North Carolina surges to 9,656,401 residents</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1157930]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1157930]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1157713'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>DCMetroRaleigh, on 24 December 2011 - 03:08 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>North Carolina has remained among the fastest-growing states in the nation during the economic downturn, adding an estimated 121,000 residents in the 15 months that ended in July, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.The state had an estimated 9,656,401 residents on July 1, or 1.3 percent more than the decennial census count on April 1, 2010. The nation's population grew 0.9 percent during that time, the slowest growth rate since the mid-1940s, the census bureau reported Wednesday. Read more here: <a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/22/1726448/state-still-among-fastest-growing.html#storylink=cpy' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/22/1726448/state-still-among-fastest-growing.html#storylink=cpy</a></div></div>]]<br />
<br />
Wow! That's amazing news!  Do they have the population info for the city of Charlotte??<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Temeteron</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sears considering relocating headquarters to North Carolina</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52501&view=findpost&p=1157916]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52501&view=findpost&p=1157916]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's the latest closing list:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://searsholdings.com/about/122711_close.pdf' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://searsholdings.com/about/122711_close.pdf</a><br />
<br />
looks like NC will be losing Sears stores in High Point, Statesville, Rocky Mount and Moorehead City<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>NCMike1981</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sears considering relocating headquarters to North Carolina</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52501&view=findpost&p=1157817]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52501&view=findpost&p=1157817]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sears obituary is continuing to trickle out of the business press:<br />
<br />
<p class='citation'>Quote</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
<strong class='bbc'>	<span style='font-size: 12px;'>Holiday Sales Woes Cast Cloud Over Sears</span></strong><br />
<br />
Sales at stores open at least 12 months have slid every year since the company was created by the well-known hedge-fund investor in 2005. But its deteriorating condition has accelerated this year—it posted a $421 million loss last quarter—and it said Tuesday that same-store sales for the eight weeks ending Christmas Day dropped 5.2% compared to the year before......<br /></div></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href='http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203479104577124151924531994.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://online.wsj.co...sNewsCollection</a><br />
<br />
EDIT: Sorry, I missed the above post before I typed.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kermit</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sears considering relocating headquarters to North Carolina</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52501&view=findpost&p=1157784]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52501&view=findpost&p=1157784]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proof that North Carolina and other states were lucky enough that Sears didn't move from Illinois. 100-120 Sears/Kmart stores will close: <a href='http://finance.yahoo.com/news/sears-close-100-120-kmart-sears-stores-113133071.html' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://finance.yahoo.com/news/sears-close-100-120-kmart-sears-stores-113133071.html</a><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>dbull75</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Census: North Carolina surges to 9,656,401 residents</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1157713]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53106&view=findpost&p=1157713]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Carolina has remained among the fastest-growing states in the nation during the economic downturn, adding an estimated 121,000 residents in the 15 months that ended in July, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.The state had an estimated 9,656,401 residents on July 1, or 1.3 percent more than the decennial census count on April 1, 2010. The nation's population grew 0.9 percent during that time, the slowest growth rate since the mid-1940s, the census bureau reported Wednesday.<br />
<br />
Read more here: <a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/22/1726448/state-still-among-fastest-growing.html#storylink=cpy' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/22/1726448/state-still-among-fastest-growing.html#storylink=cpy</a><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DCMetroRaleigh</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157673]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157673]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've seen Piedmont consists as long as 5 coaches and as short as 2. This was before they started the midday train, though. They certainly do add and remove cars but I'm not sure how much leeway they have to do so now that they have to maintain two trainsets.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157639]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157639]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Orulz!<br />
<br />
My return trip to Charlotte on the midday Piedmont today was also _crazy_ crowded (with three coaches plus the baggage / lounge car). It makes me wonder, does NCDOT have the ability to add / drop rolling stock in Raleigh as demand requires or are they currently stuck with fixed consists?<br />
<br />
Crowds like today make me think that ridership is going to really explode on the route if we _ever_ get a downtown Charlotte station.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kermit</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157633]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157633]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a time line or schedule or some way to know what is coming with the ARRA projects? All I can find is the project list on the NCDOT site, but no dates or the current status of the project.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>thetrick</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157586]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157586]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1157548'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>kermit, on 21 December 2011 - 03:42 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Anyone know what is happening at the High Point station? It looks like they are moving a retaining wall and -possibly- adding a third track.<br />
<br />
FWIW: the mid-day northbound train was VERY crowded today. There was also a surprising amount of short-distance traffic (e.g. Clt-Kannapolis, Kannapolis-Salisbury and Greensboro-Burlington all had traffic)<br /></div></div>
This is an ARRA project. This will add parking spaces along the south side of the tracks between the station and Elm street. It will also result in a longer platform that would serve a third track (if it existed) but no third track will be installed, at least not as a part of this project.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157548]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1157548]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone know what is happening at the High Point station? It looks like they are moving a retaining wall and -possibly- adding a third track.<br />
<br />
FWIW: the mid-day northbound train was VERY crowded today. There was also a surprising amount of short-distance traffic (e.g. Clt-Kannapolis, Kannapolis-Salisbury and Greensboro-Burlington all had traffic)<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kermit</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156849]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156849]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I was checking out the Amtrak site and saw they were looking to start thru coach service Wilson-Greenville-Kinston-New Bern- Havelock-Wilmington and Wilson-Goldsboro-Wallace-Wilmington. I say interesting, but if there is feasibility for coach service, I would think NC would say "hey, there should be feasibility for rail service". Second of all, I think I would rather see the service at Selma since it allows connection to Raleigh and Charlotte..<br />
<br />
So, if the coaches meet in Wilson, you can get on the Silver lines and Palmetto, I believe..<br />
<br />
If you get through Selma, you can get on the Silver lines, Palmetto, and Piedmont.. more options, right?<br />
<br />
I'm still a fan of rail service to the beach and believe it should meet up with the Piemont and be called the Crystal Coast Service (2x daily with 3 coach and 1 vending/sundry car - Raleigh to Morehead City) and the Blackbeard Service (2x daily with 3 coaches and 1 vending/baggage - Raleigh to Little Washington).<br />
<br />
But I digress...<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ERJ170</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156542]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156542]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NJ Transit has bi-level cars that are used on both low-level and high-level platforms--they just have multiple sets of doors and only some work on each type of platform.  And Amtrak's Amfleet, Viewliner and Heritage Fleet cars currently run between Charlotte and DC AND in the Northeast, with high-level platforms. The same equipment can run on both.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mallguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156534]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156534]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1156508'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>orulz, on 06 December 2011 - 10:34 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
First, with the proposed track configuration, freight trains must pass by on the platform tracks for the SEHSR (S-line) platform. The H-line platform is off the mainline. It might be possible to find a configuration that would keep freight off the platform tracks, but it would probably have some other limitation or require reconfiguring the Norfolk-Southern line to Fayetteville, which they will not entertain.<br />
<br />
Second, there's a possibility that the SEHSR will actually use low platform rolling stock, Though I'd rather it doesn't since that precludes through-running past Washington.<br /></div></div>
<br />
That's what I was thinking, issues with freight sharing the same tracks as the platform.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156508]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156508]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1156376'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>cowboy_wilhelm, on 03 December 2011 - 02:23 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
I went back over this, and saw the proposed H-Line platform (Piedmont, Carolinian, Silver Star [assuming the latter two continue going through Rocky Mount]) will be a high platform, which is great for faster boarding times. However, the proposed S-Line platform for SEHSR is a low platform. I wonder why? You'd think high platforms would be preferred for SEHSR.<br /></div></div>
First, with the proposed track configuration, freight trains must pass by on the platform tracks for the SEHSR (S-line) platform. The H-line platform is off the mainline. It might be possible to find a configuration that would keep freight off the platform tracks, but it would probably have some other limitation or require reconfiguring the Norfolk-Southern line to Fayetteville, which they will not entertain.<br />
<br />
Second, there's a possibility that the SEHSR will actually use low platform rolling stock, Though I'd rather it doesn't since that precludes through-running past Washington.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156376]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156376]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1154079'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>orulz, on 31 October 2011 - 10:46 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Here is a <a href='http://www.raleighnc.gov/content/BoardsCommissions/Documents/PRTF/PRTFRelatedDocuments/NCDOTViaductBuildingAssessment.pdf' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>document (pdf)</a> that shows how the Viaduct Building in the center of the Raleigh wye could be modified into a train station. Looks pretty interesting. The main entrance to the station would be from a pedestrian plaza at the end of Martin Street, where pedestrians could walk under the tracks. The vehicular entrance for buses and cars would be from a southward extension of West Street.<br /></div></div>
<br />
I went back over this, and saw the proposed H-Line platform (Piedmont, Carolinian, Silver Star [assuming the latter two continue going through Rocky Mount]) will be a high platform, which is great for faster boarding times. However, the proposed S-Line platform for SEHSR is a low platform. I wonder why? You'd think high platforms would be preferred for SEHSR.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Atlantic Coast Conference is expanding again</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156351]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156351]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1156156'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>dbull75, on 30 November 2011 - 10:31 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Same could be said about Charlotte and schools like VA Tech, UNC and Clemson. All within reasonsable driving distance and lots of their fans live here. You would know that since you used to live here <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /></div></div>
<br />
Well it's more than just about the presence of fans; Athens is only a few years away from literally being included in the Atlanta MSA/CSA as it is directly borders the metro area. There's quite a bit of spatial separation between Charlotte and VA Tech, Clemson, and UNC by comparison. But like I said, Atlanta is technically neutral territory. Jacksonville and Tampa are truly neutral though.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>krazeeboi</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Atlantic Coast Conference is expanding again</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156156]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156156]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1156144'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>krazeeboi, on 30 November 2011 - 08:56 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
And Atlanta's not really all that neutral for the SEC with Athens only being about a hour east; there are tons upon tons of Bulldog fans in Atlanta. But in a technical sense, it's a neutral site since there are no SEC schools in Atlanta proper.<br /></div></div>
Same could be said about Charlotte and schools like VA Tech, UNC and Clemson. All within reasonsable driving distance and lots of their fans live here. You would know that since you used to live here <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>dbull75</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156151]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1156151]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^ It looked like the NCRR row was being surveyed today in Newell (about a mile north of Junker). Perhaps this is the start of dirt turning?<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>kermit</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Atlantic Coast Conference is expanding again</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156144]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156144]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1156134'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>dbull75, on 30 November 2011 - 06:57 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Conference championship games for football are either at the team with the best in-conference record (see Pac-12 or Conf USA) or at a neutral site such as Charlotte (ACC), Indianapolis (Big 10), Atlanta (SEC), etc.</div></div>
<br />
And Atlanta's not really all that neutral for the SEC with Athens only being about a hour east; there are tons upon tons of Bulldog fans in Atlanta. But in a technical sense, it's a neutral site since there are no SEC schools in Atlanta proper.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>krazeeboi</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Atlantic Coast Conference is expanding again</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156134]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156134]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^One of the reasons the ACC Football championship is hosted in Charlotte (and previously Tampa and Jacksonville) is because it's considered a "neutral" field. Conference championship games for football are either at the team with the best in-conference record (see Pac-12 or Conf USA) or at a neutral site such as Charlotte (ACC), Indianapolis (Big 10), Atlanta (SEC), etc. With the success of the ACC football game in Charlotte, not many people see the conference championship being played elsewhere for a while. They are supposed to make a recommendation on future sites next month I believe. As far as basketball goes, the ACC has an agreement in place over the next several years to host it in Greensboro mostly and Atlanta on occasion. Charlotte isn't currently slated to have the tournament. I think you underestimate the number of ACC fans in other parts of the Carolinas as well. There are easily just as many in Greensboro and Charlotte as there are in the Raleigh-Durham area.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>dbull75</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Atlantic Coast Conference is expanding again</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156120]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1156120]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question.. with CLT hosting the ACC football tournament and in line to potentially host the Basketball tournament, is it time to look at hosting one or the other in the Raleigh-Durham area? I mean, CLT has no ACC affiliated school whatsoever and making some big bucks off it. Greensboro is ACC HQ so I can understand that. But the triangle is home to 2 of the top schools in the conference (+ State) and doesn't get to hold any of the tournament.. Is it time for Raleigh and Durham to pony up to push for the ACC tournament?<br />
<br />
Just wondering because at least in the RTP area, fans from all across the state can make it to the tournament without having to drive trans-state..<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ERJ170</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Casinos all over North Carolina?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52918&view=findpost&p=1156074]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52918&view=findpost&p=1156074]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1156021'><img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_images/up2011a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>cityboi, on 29 November 2011 - 07:01 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>
Gov Perdue signs Cherokee gaming expansion deal which would allow live table gambling. This move also opens the door to native american run casinos opening across the state even in urban cities such as Charlotte or Greensboro.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.news-record.com/blog/53964/entry/132744' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.news-reco...64/entry/132744</a><br /></div></div>
<br />
Wow, so they actually went through with it! So what exactly does this mean for the major cities of NC? I only saw them talking about live table gambling, but I didn't see the other commercial gambling games(slot machines, etc). Do you know if this plan will include the commercial gambling we see in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, New Orleans, etc.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Lee street bully</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Casinos all over North Carolina?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52918&view=findpost&p=1156021]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52918&view=findpost&p=1156021]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gov Perdue signs Cherokee gaming expansion deal which would allow live table gambling. This move also opens the door to native american run casinos opening across the state even in urban cities such as Charlotte or Greensboro.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.news-record.com/blog/53964/entry/132744' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.news-reco...64/entry/132744</a><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cityboi</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Macy's out, Belk in at Wilmington's Mayfaire]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32430&view=findpost&p=1155871]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32430&view=findpost&p=1155871]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just out of curiosity, whatever happened to Autumn Hall<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DigitalSky</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1155255]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1155255]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NCDOT has intiated websites for two of the ARRA funded projects.  These are two of five capacity improvement projects that are part of the Piedmont Improvement  Program which runs between Raleigh and Charlotte.  These two projects will add over 20 miles of second mainline track between Charlotte and Raleigh. When a third project between Lexington and Thomasville is constructed, it will result in a over 92 miles of continuous double track mainline between Greensboro and Charlotte.<br />
<br />
There are two other projects that will construct sidings between Graham and Haw River (10,000 ft) and between  I-40 and Morrisville (3.8 miles).  All of these capacity projects will facilitate (in the near future) two additional Piedmont round trips between Raleigh and Charlotte and in the not so distant future SEHSR trains.<br />
<br />
.<br />
<a href='http://www.ncdot.gov/projects/RailHaydockJunker/' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.ncdot.gov/projects/RailHaydockJunker/</a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.ncdot.gov/projects/RailReidKannapolis/' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.ncdot.gov/projects/RailReidKannapolis/</a><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Otto</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina Intercity Rail Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1155107]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17212&view=findpost&p=1155107]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant there was no Wi-Fi service in southern Virginia the times I checked (ended up watching a movie instead).<br />
<br />
I'm not sure about Charlotte to Raleigh WiFi; boarded in Raleigh.<br />
<br />
We departed Raleigh half an hour late due to the late northbound Silver Star arriving when the Carolinian was scheduled to arrive (10:20ish). Made up time in Virginia and was back on schedule from Washington north.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cowboy_wilhelm</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Atlantic Coast Conference is expanding again</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1155076]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=52935&view=findpost&p=1155076]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will be awesome to have a NC school in the Big East.  It will be awesome for increasing ECU's profile, especially in major media markets.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DCMetroRaleigh</author>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
