Here are some links to previous discussions on Houston's efforts to build an LRT:
Houston: Metro rail still a dividing line, Development along the route?
Trains finally roll in Houston rail system
Long road to rail in Houston will finally end
--------------------------------------------------------------
The newest update is this:
"The Federal Transit Administration's notice of intent to approve preliminary engineering next month for the Main Street light rail extension to Northline Mall and a new line to the southeast side clears a major hurdle for the Metropolitan Transit Authority's efforts to obtain half the projects' costs from Washington."
Thats funding for TWO extensions to to Houston's LRT. However, "Houston still has numerous steps toward obtaining the $390 million it needs for the 50 percent federal match on the Northline and Southeast sections."
"Houston will be competing with at least 25 other cities that also have projects in preliminary engineering this year. The FTA has recommended Congress appropriate $122 million for all of these projects in the next fiscal year. If Metro only gets an average allocation, it can expect $5 million from Uncle Sam next year."
So its some good news, and some bad. Here is the full story from the Houston Chronicle
Houston Rail Developments
Started by
Spartan
, Mar 30 2005 12:30 PM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 30 March 2005 - 12:30 PM
#2
Posted 30 March 2005 - 02:42 PM
Sounds pretty good to me. I wonder what are the other 25 projects and other cities, Houston is competing against for federal dollars?
#3
Posted 30 March 2005 - 11:12 PM
Me too
#4
Posted 19 June 2005 - 07:10 PM
A new transit plan for Houston was released this week that would subsitute planned light rail lines with Bus Rapid Transit. The BRT would run for 40 miles on its own dedicated guideways in the North, South, Harrisburg, and Uptown corridors. Rails would be laid and covered in asphalt so it could be converted to light rail when the ridership numbers justify it.
The existing MetroRail line would be extended north to a site near Burnett. There it would connect to a 20-mile long commuter rail line that would run along the Northwest Freeway to Barker-Cypress.
There is also another commuter rail line planned to Missouri City.
The plan is expected to cost $2 billion with half coming from the FTA and the other being matched by Metro. They hope to get $400 million from the current federal funding cycle and $600 million in the next cycle.
Story at http://www.chron.com...l/front/3224120
Below is a link to another Houston Chronicle story comparing what Houston's possible BRT system could be like to the existing Las Vegas MAX system.
http://www.chron.com...opstory/3231107
The existing MetroRail line would be extended north to a site near Burnett. There it would connect to a 20-mile long commuter rail line that would run along the Northwest Freeway to Barker-Cypress.
There is also another commuter rail line planned to Missouri City.
The plan is expected to cost $2 billion with half coming from the FTA and the other being matched by Metro. They hope to get $400 million from the current federal funding cycle and $600 million in the next cycle.
Story at http://www.chron.com...l/front/3224120
Below is a link to another Houston Chronicle story comparing what Houston's possible BRT system could be like to the existing Las Vegas MAX system.
http://www.chron.com...opstory/3231107
#5
Posted 20 June 2005 - 05:37 AM
Wow, $400 million is going to be very wishful thinking. They really need a source of local funding for the line that exceeds this for it to even be considered. Maybe they didn't realize their former governer and his family are very anti-transit.
#6
Posted 20 June 2005 - 12:26 PM
It seems sort of ridiculous to construct something, purchase specialized vehicles to run on it, and then cover it up with the eventual expectation of closing and ripping it up again and purchasing different specialized vehicles.
It just seems a little counter-intuitive.
I'm not saying that they should go the San Diego route and built a massive system all at once, but there surely has to be a better way of doing this.
It just seems a little counter-intuitive.
I'm not saying that they should go the San Diego route and built a massive system all at once, but there surely has to be a better way of doing this.
#7
Posted 19 November 2005 - 07:47 AM
The Metropolitan Transit Authority will recieve $12 million from a Transportation Department spending bill that was passed by the House and Senate on Friday.
Metro also recieved $2 million for bus system improvements.
Houston Chronicle: Congress OKs $12 million for Metro, other projects
Quote
The money will help pay for preliminary engineering on Metro's planned North and Southeast lines, which will connect to the present Main Street line. The agency plans to initially use buses running on their own guideways in the two corridors, then convert to light rail after ridership increases.
Houston Chronicle: Congress OKs $12 million for Metro, other projects
#8
Posted 16 June 2006 - 08:53 PM
Instead of ripping the rail out of the i10 west area they should have increased it. What super smart decision was it to increase i10? Fools.
#9
Posted 26 January 2007 - 04:34 PM
Metro has begun negotiations with Washington Group International on four planned BRT lines. But, two local members of congress hope to secure federal money to build light rail on the corridors instead.
Site prep and some construction for these lines is scheduled to begin this summer and all the lines are expected to be running by 2012.
Houston Choricle: Congress members push light-rail funding
Quote
Metro said last year it would build the lines with rail in the ground and operate buses in their own right-of-way — separated from other traffic — along the track until ridership grows enough to justify switching to trains.
Some residents who voted for light rail in a 2003 referendum have objected to that, and Reps. Sheila Jackson Lee and Al Green, both D-Houston, said they would work with the Democratic majority in Congress to get the rail funding.
The two lawmakers attended the meeting at which the Metropolitan Transit Authority board approved negotiating with a team headed by Washington Group International for the $1 billion project to design and build the planned North, East End, Southeast and Uptown lines and a north side "intermodal terminal" for buses and trains.
Some residents who voted for light rail in a 2003 referendum have objected to that, and Reps. Sheila Jackson Lee and Al Green, both D-Houston, said they would work with the Democratic majority in Congress to get the rail funding.
The two lawmakers attended the meeting at which the Metropolitan Transit Authority board approved negotiating with a team headed by Washington Group International for the $1 billion project to design and build the planned North, East End, Southeast and Uptown lines and a north side "intermodal terminal" for buses and trains.
Houston Choricle: Congress members push light-rail funding
#10
Posted 06 February 2007 - 09:33 AM
Two Metro Transit lines are recommended to recieve funding in President Bushs' latest budget proposal. The proposal calls for $72 million to go to six projects across the nation with including two in Houston, the North and Southeast lines.
Houston Chronicle: Houston could benefit under budget proposal
Quote
The North line would extend the existing Main Street light rail half a mile north of the University of Houston-Downtown, then run bus rapid transit — trainlike buses in guideways — five miles along Main and Fulton to Northline Mall. The Southeast line, also likely using bus rapid transit, would start downtown on Rusk and Capitol and continue to Palm Center via Scott, Wheeler, Martin Luther King and Long.
#11
Posted 06 February 2007 - 04:31 PM
Glad to see this.













