PROPOSED: Conley Wharf
#1
Posted 08 April 2005 - 06:34 AM
Conley touts a facelift for Allens Avenue waterfront
BY ROBIN AMER
Buddy Cianci should feel somewhat vindicated. The former mayor’s Three Cities Plan — targeting underutilized areas of Providence for major redevelopment — is coming to fruition in ways that once seemed unlikely. There’s the redevelopment of the Promenade district, the stretch of old mill buildings behind the Providence Place Mall, and talk of reconnecting the downtown and West Side halves of Westminster Street. But what about remaking the industrial stretch of waterfront along Allens Avenue into a bourgeois residential playground called "Narragansett Landing"?
Patrick Conley, lawyer, developer, and scholar of Rhode Island history, is hoping to add the last scenario to the list. Right now, the stretch between Eddy Street and Thurbers Avenue, home to several industrial businesses and a few strip-clubs, is otherwise littered with asphalt, dirt pits, and oil tank farms. But Conley is at the early stages of what he says will be a $110 million-$120 million, 11-acre redevelopment project.
He envisions a 130-suite extended stay hotel topped with several floors of million-dollar residential condos; a multi-story parking garage with 800 to 1000 spaces (Conley says the exact number depends on interest from nearby Rhode Island Hospital, which will lose much of its parking to the I-195 relocation); a 400-slip marina with "dockaminiums"; docking facilities for cruise ships; and, possibly, a stop for the Newport ferry.
One element of the project, the renovation of the former Providence Teaming Company building, a four-story, 45,000-square-foot Conley-owned mill building on the site, is nearly complete. Under a five-year, $6-per-square foot agreement, the bottom three floors of the 1899-era structure, the oldest surviving building on the outer harbor, will be master-leased to the Partnership for Creative Industrial Space, which, in turn, will make it available as artists’ work space. The top floor will be reserved for an upscale seafood restaurant, Patrick’s Pier One, to be managed by Conley’s wife, Gail, and a conference center for nonprofits run by the Rhode Island Publications Society.
Conley says plans for the hotel and condos remain in the "embryonic stage," and that he is "wide open to potential partners." Asked how such stuff will compete with other new condos and luxury apartments in Providence, he says, "Count the number of condos on the water. These will be the only ones on the outer harbor of Providence. They’ll have a view of the skyline. They’ll have a great view down the bay. No other condo in Providence will have that kind of a setting and that kind of a vista. All those other condos pale to insignificance to a waterfront condo." Conley says he expects more development to follow along the waterfront, saying, "It’s a natural."
But other land and business owners on Allens Avenue, including Sprague Corporation, which ships bulk products like liquid asphalt and road salt, and the Promet Marine Services ship repair yard, may not share Conley’s vision. Peter Gerry, owner of Pete’s Tire Barn, which operates an adjacent specialty retail store and repair facility, says he believes the city is discouraging industrial usage of the area. "I don’t think the city wants anything like us," Gerry says. "But they don’t understand that someone still has to haul away the rubber, and fix the tires on the fire trucks. They’re discouraging and chasing manufacturing out of the community." Gerry says he has no plans to relocate his facility. He declines to comment on whether Conley offered to buy his property, saying only, "Conley is trying to buy everything he can around there."
Thom Deller, Providence’s director of Planning & Development, says Conley has not yet formally approached the city with his plan, but that "any development along Allens Ave. that helps clean up the environmental problems and rehabs property and makes space for artists is good." However, Deller adds that the city has a more extensive vision for the area. It has hired Watertown, Massachusetts-based urban planning consultants Sasaki Corporation to develop a plan that will consider the city’s industrial areas, and Deller says, "Try to tie them all together to work as one unified piece."
"An 800-car lot is nice," Deller says. "But [among other things] we need to increase our tax base. From that point of view, what I’ve heard so far is barely scratching the surface of the potential for the area."
Issue Date: April 8 - 14, 2005
Full Phoenix Story here
#2
Posted 08 April 2005 - 08:41 AM
the same Pat Conley who has bought up hundreds of properties in South Providence over the years at tax sale and sat on them like a typical slum lord?
oh yeah, and had a partner named Buddy Cianci after conviction #1? wow, this is old school providence coming right back to the surface...
awful awful awful...
#3
Posted 08 April 2005 - 09:07 AM
eltron, on Apr 8 2005, 10:41 AM, said:
the same Pat Conley who has bought up hundreds of properties in South Providence over the years at tax sale and sat on them like a typical slum lord?
oh yeah, and had a partner named Buddy Cianci after conviction #1? wow, this is old school providence coming right back to the surface...
awful awful awful...
#4
Posted 08 April 2005 - 09:08 AM
#5
Posted 08 April 2005 - 11:32 AM
AriPVD, on Apr 8 2005, 11:08 AM, said:
You'd think so...
but in practice, I think he has probably been one of the more significant barriers to prosperity around here.
fascinating really.
#6
Posted 08 April 2005 - 11:36 AM
Copyright 2003 Providence Publications, LLC
Providence Journal-Bulletin (Rhode Island)
December 2, 2003, Tuesday All Edition
HEADLINE: COMMENTARY - Murphy's law in R.I.
BYLINE: Edward Achorn,
BODY:
WHAT ARE CITIZENS to make of this? Rhode Island House Speaker William Murphy confronted with a touchy case involving his top lieutenant, Majority Leader Gordon Fox has declared that a passage on ethics in the state constitution doesn't apply. So he'll let the matter drop.
That's public service, Rhode Island-style.
Here's the background: A law firm with which Mr. Fox is associated, Ferrucci Russo, did work for GTECH while the Rhode Island-based lottery giant was trying to get breaks from the taxpayers to remain in the state. Ferrucci Russo billed GTECH for a reported 375 hours, including 40 attributed to Mr. Fox.
Some people found that a conflict of interest. The citizens' group Operation Clean Government sought an ethics review.
...
Mr. Murphy, in turn, sought an opinion about that section from a prominent lawyer/businessman/historian named Patrick Conley. Mr. Conley would seem to know what he's talking about: He's the author of 14 books about Rhode Island history. He has been selected to write the volume on the Rhode Island Constitution in the scholarly series State Constitutions of the United States, edited by the Center for State Constitutional Studies at Rutgers University.
The only thing is, Mr. Conley appears to be an unusual kind of historian. In a small state where everybody seems to know everyone, he has not always maintained objective distance from politicians.
He worked for the House leadership during the reign of Speaker John Harwood, when he bitterly opposed the separation-of-powers reform, designed to balance power and end the legislature's corrupting dominance.
He joined in buying "distressed" property in Providence with corrupt ex-Mayor Buddy Cianci after Cianci's thuggishness caused the mayor's first ouster. And Mr. Conley worked to help put Cianci back in office.
This is the expert that Speaker Murphy turned to for an opinion touching on ethics in the Rhode Island House.
And he delivered this opinion: That part of the constitution "has no applicability to the present controversy" because it is "obsolete." In Mr. Conley's view, that language only applied to the years before 1856, when the General Assembly heard cases as a court of appeals.
....
Unlike Mr. Conley, I am no expert on Rhode Island constitutional history. But surely, common sense would suggest some questions:
X Since when does the word case apply solely to a court of law? In any standard English dictionary as well as in the state constitution a case can obviously mean a matter pending before the legislature.
X If this section is "obsolete," why did Rhode Islanders keep it there for the last 150 years, though they could have discarded it in constitutional conventions? Indeed, why did the state go to the trouble of making the section "gender-neutral" in the mid-1980s if it is obsolete?
X If the legislature thinks that a section governing ethics is obsolete, why not put the case (that word again!) to the voters and let them decide?
X May a speaker ignore sections of the constitution merely by obtaining an opinion by a hand-picked expert stating that they are obsolete?
When Mr. Murphy was raised to his leadership position, the most powerful political post in Rhode Island, he asserted that he wanted to be part of profound reform. He made an excellent start by respecting the public's wishes on separation of powers.
......
Surely, there are smart, honorable people who could be drawn into leadership roles in the House. If Mr. Murphy wants to improve the state's civic culture, he must make it clear that his leadership team meets a high standard.
Sending that message will not be easy, since Mr. Murphy must hold onto various coalitions to cling to power. But, in grasping at such an opinion to shield his lieutenant from scrutiny, he looks like a leader who is trying to evade responsibility and play the people of Rhode Island for dupes. Ultimately, that won't help his cause.
Edward Achorn is The Journal's deputy editorial pages editor. His e-mail address is eachorn@projo.com.
-From Lexis Nexis so I can't post a link...
#7
Posted 08 April 2005 - 11:52 AM
type in his name in a Lexis Nexus search and many many articles come up with stuff like this:
"What are we going to do about Patrick Conley," asked Beverly Austin, a South Providence resident. Conley, a former business partner of Mayor Vincent A. Cianci, has made much of his fortune buying properties at tax sales, including some 200 to 300 parcels in the South Providence area alone.
Residents say it's people like Conley - who buy up the land at tax sale, and do nothing afterward to see that the properties are kept up - who have played a major role in creating the problem. Their solution: bar such speculators from grabbing up any more land by prohibiting anyone who is behind tax payments or has failed to pay an environmental fine from taking part in any more tax sales."
This is from a 1997 projo article, and he has been doing this for DECADES. He is a dirty guy, and I certianly wouldn't trust any deals with him. PCIS better beware.
#8
Posted 08 April 2005 - 02:46 PM
#9
Posted 08 April 2005 - 02:53 PM
Cotuit, on Apr 8 2005, 04:46 PM, said:
Hey, you've already got legs and eggs...
#10
Posted 08 April 2005 - 06:33 PM
Cotuit, on Apr 8 2005, 04:46 PM, said:
#11
Posted 11 April 2005 - 09:18 PM
eltron, on Apr 8 2005, 12:52 PM, said:
This is interesting... I have heard that more than once from other people. I dont really like his plans (from the sound of the PBN aritcle) to buy up everything on the waterfront. There are plenty of legitamate, albeit not pretty, businesses there who have stuck it out with Providence through the long haul. Redevelop the Atlas warehouses or something... dont buy out the poor shipyards.
#12
Posted 12 April 2005 - 04:45 AM
ArtInRuins, on Apr 11 2005, 09:18 PM, said:
http://www.projo.com...it.1ba6501.html
As for Allens Ave., I would have no problem seeing all the strip clubs go but for those legit businesses we need the jobs they provide. Same goes for Promenade where a lot of blue collar jobs are still located.
#13
Posted 12 April 2005 - 10:10 AM
eltron, on Apr 8 2005, 10:41 AM, said:
the same Pat Conley who has bought up hundreds of properties in South Providence over the years at tax sale and sat on them like a typical slum lord?
oh yeah, and had a partner named Buddy Cianci after conviction #1? wow, this is old school providence coming right back to the surface...
awful awful awful...
I hope the city doesn't accept any proposals from that clown Conley. While Deller makes the point that the city needs to raise its tax-base, they almost certainly won't if that clown is able to get his hands on that land. Providence does need to raise its tax base and should redevelop that part of the waterfront - but maybe by having both housing and businesses over there. That development should not be given over to only one person - and certainly not one who is a slumlord.
#14
Posted 12 April 2005 - 12:47 PM
AriPVD, on Apr 8 2005, 11:08 AM, said:
But if Conley really cared about Providence, that clown would have developed those South Providence properties, rather than just sit on them and let them continue to rot. Seems like he's looking out more for himself than the future of the city.
Edited by Mike D, 12 April 2005 - 12:50 PM.
#16
Posted 01 May 2005 - 08:59 AM
gregw, on May 1 2005, 06:47 AM, said:
What a bizarre article... It all sounds interesting (someone I know who owns a boat confirms that the Providence area could definitely use another marina) but it also all sounds very tenuous. I guess the RIPTA ferry move and the Sloop Providence and Russian sub could all go there, but just who would want to go there to visit those things? This also only just moves around area assets and doesn't build new ones... This guy Conley has some ego though, huh?Thoughts?
- Garris
#17
Posted 01 May 2005 - 09:38 AM
I like Deller's comment on how he wants the area to be dense enough to support a train trolley, it shows that someone's finally looking in that direction.
#18
Posted 01 May 2005 - 10:22 AM
Seriously though, I'm a bit skeptical of this idea to fix up what is basically already an economically viable area, on Allens Ave. from Sprague energy to the Sewage Treatment plant to the Port of Providence. Why not focus instead on the Old Harbor area, India Point, and Fox's Point, which are devoid of noxious fumes, as the setting for a white collar waterfront. The new 195 land, when it comes online, could be used to complement a residential/recreational/touristic waterfront area.
When Cianci proposed the New Cities thing, apparently no one thought to consider the economic roles of the areas that were to be redone. Thus, Promenade, which is still pretty industrialized, was to be leveled to create a glitzy suburban-style office park. Meanwhile, Downcity languished and Capital Center remained half completed.
#19
Posted 01 May 2005 - 09:16 PM
http://www.artinruin...develop/dunlop/
The best view, i thought, though, was from the restaurant, of the pink Cheaters building. Now that's upscale.
#20
Posted 02 May 2005 - 08:46 AM
Quote
Conley's proposal fits in with the city's vision for the area, Deller said.
"The plan seems headed in the right direction," Deller said. "We want people to be able to go out there and enjoy the water."
Deller suggested that Conley build higher.
Quote
The city plan commission wants a trolley!? Are they serious!?
Quote
Karen Mensel, a RIPTA spokeswoman, said RIPTA officials are interested in moving to Conley's property. The wharf appeals to the transportation agency because it shortens the trip to Newport, has more parking, and bypasses the hurricane barrier, through which navigation is difficult.
The pilots "do it well, but it's always dicey," she said.
If Conley's dock is suitable, Mensel said, the ferry could move there by the end of the year.
RIPTA may move the ferry this year!?!?! So this guy is serious? He has money? This could make the Power Block look like kids playing in a sand box (Brussat's modernist sandbox
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













