Jump to content


- - - - -

I-126 Improvements!


  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic

#1 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,007 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 08 April 2005 - 04:17 PM

I heard today on WIS that an 8 or 9 mile stretch of I-126 and I-26 will undergo resurfacing. They will also replace the guard rails. The project is set to begin later this month (April) and it should take approximately 7 months. Anyone that has driven I-126 in the past 10 years knows that this section of road is in horroble condition.

 

#2 HAMMETTM

HAMMETTM

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 663 posts

Posted 08 April 2005 - 04:56 PM

I drive down 126 everyday and it is an eyesore as well as faster wear and tear on my car.

#3 JW2

JW2

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Location:Columbia (Irmo), SC

Posted 09 April 2005 - 01:03 AM

Thank goodness...  It's embarassing to drive on that road with out of state visitors.

#4 Jerseyman4

Jerseyman4

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,084 posts
  • Location:NC High Country

Posted 09 April 2005 - 08:56 PM

I didnt drive on I-126 yet so you Columbians have been spared from any derrogotory road related comments  :thumbsup:

Hopefully what they are doing, it can look as nice as SC 277. I have one photo of SC 277? Anybody would like to tell me what that pedestrian bridge is there for?

[attachment=241:attachment]

#5 waccamatt

waccamatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 3,824 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 09 April 2005 - 10:28 PM

Jerseyman4, on Apr 9 2005, 08:56 PM, said:

I didnt drive on I-126 yet so you Columbians have been spared from any derrogotory road related comments  :thumbsup:

Hopefully what they are doing, it can look as nice as SC 277. I have one photo of SC 277? Anybody would like to tell me what that pedestrian bridge is there for?

Attachment attachment

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


When 277 was built it split a neighborhood in half. The pedestrian bridge was built because people (esp kids) would walk across the freeway because the exits are a couple of miles apart on that stretch of 277. The intent of the crosswalk was to allow people to cross the freeway that way instead of crossing the road. Some people still take the shorter way across the road, though.

#6 Hybrid0NE

Hybrid0NE

    Hamlet

  • Editor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 617 posts
  • Location:Atlanta's Sprawl

Posted 10 April 2005 - 08:19 AM

Does this mean they're gonna fix the rollercoaster (bridge over Broad/Congaree River)?  I love the way it makes my car bounce up and down as I'm accelerating to 70mph. :D

#7 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,007 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 10 April 2005 - 11:13 AM

Jerseyman4, on Apr 9 2005, 09:56 PM, said:

I didnt drive on I-126 yet so you Columbians have been spared from any derrogotory road related comments  :thumbsup:

Hopefully what they are doing, it can look as nice as SC 277. I have one photo of SC 277? Anybody would like to tell me what that pedestrian bridge is there for?

Attachment attachment

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That bridge was a pork project from Jim Clyburn. I understand the its purpose- but I consider it to be a waste of taxpayer money since they don't use it.

#8 Infinite1

Infinite1

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 315 posts
  • Location:Charleston, SC

Posted 10 April 2005 - 09:55 PM

Spartan, on Apr 10 2005, 01:13 PM, said:

That bridge was a pork project from Jim Clyburn. I understand the its purpose- but I consider it to be a waste of taxpayer money since they don't use it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



It probably would have gotten more use if it were built 30 years ago when it was promised.  Nevertheless, I think its always a good thing for the goverment to keep its promises.

#9 The_sandlapper

The_sandlapper

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,176 posts
  • Location:The SC Sandhills

Posted 11 April 2005 - 02:30 PM

That's good. It's high time SC did something with it's highways. It's really embarassing when you are traveling down NC highways's and cross over into the crappy looking interstates of SC. It's like we just give up? I can always tell I'm home though.

Edited by The_sandlapper, 11 April 2005 - 02:31 PM.


#10 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,007 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 11 April 2005 - 02:58 PM

LOL our interstates are crappy? NC's are by far the worst. To NC's credit they are upgrading what seems to be their entire interstate system at the same time. Ours are rough in places, but I think they are better over all.

#11 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,466 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 11 April 2005 - 05:52 PM

I don't think ours are that bad either. I remember when I-77 north from Richland into Fairfield was REALLY rough. But the state got that together. I-95 in Orangeburg County, especially at the I-26/I-95 interchange, is quite rough though; not sure whether they've patched that up yet, haven't traveled through there in about 2 years.

#12 The_sandlapper

The_sandlapper

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,176 posts
  • Location:The SC Sandhills

Posted 11 April 2005 - 06:04 PM

I-26 south of Columbia isn't that bad, they seem to have dressed up the median with some green life, same for I-26 north of Columbia. I know they are supposed to dressing up the median on I-385 leading into DT Greenville, there was some talk about it and construction going on before I left in 03.

#13 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,466 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 11 April 2005 - 06:08 PM

Yeah I-26 south of Columbia isn't bad, but just watch out for cops hiding among the trees!

#14 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,007 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 11 April 2005 - 07:56 PM

385 is pretty bad, but it is being widened and resurfaced as we speak.

#15 Jerseyman4

Jerseyman4

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,084 posts
  • Location:NC High Country

Posted 11 April 2005 - 08:32 PM

One major flaw with interstates and freeways in SC is that they do not install median guardrails/wired guardrails at the extent of what NC does on the majority of its interstates/freeways. It has prevented a lot of head on collisions over the years!

I remember a few years ago (reported on WCSC) in teh summer that I-26 was having a lot of a head on collisions between Cola and Charleston (Orangeburg County i believe). Is that still the case today? I know parts of I-26 have median wired/steel guardrails but certainly not the entire interstate.

As far pavement quality, with SC's new urban interstate construction rehabbing the existening interstate (like I-77) is very very good. Much better than NC's I-77 in south Charlotte. The Cola interstates are very good too with excellent pavement quality and full left/right shoulders.

Overall, NC has an big edge over SC with saftey designs (guardrails, reflectors, rumble strips, signage, etc) on an interstate. Pavement quality, NC has a slight edge (just interstates only). However, since SCDOT is under funded (lowest funded DOT in the country) and can only do so much, the interstates are pretty good of what they are able to do.

#16 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,007 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 11 April 2005 - 09:57 PM

What do you mean? Every interstate in SC has guardwires as far as I know. I haven't been on every inch of interestate in SC, but I've been on most of it.  Everything you said about NC can be applied to SC- guard rails, rumble strips etc.

#17 Jerseyman4

Jerseyman4

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,084 posts
  • Location:NC High Country

Posted 11 April 2005 - 11:38 PM

Mainly median guardrails is what SC lacks on their interstates that NC does an excellent job on their interstates and freeways.

#18 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,007 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 12 April 2005 - 09:02 AM

That is what you said before. I drive I-26, 126 and 85 on a regular basis, and I have been on 20 and 385 recently. We have median guardwires everywhere I have been. If there aren't guardwires then there is a concrete barrier (85 in Greenville, 585 in Spartanburg, 126 in Columbia, etc.). The only time their are gaps is when their has been a wreck and the cables are being replaced after serving their purpose. I have not seen any reason or proof that NC has a better median guardwire system than SC.

#19 sonofaque86

sonofaque86

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,357 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 12 April 2005 - 09:33 AM

On I-126 why are there not more light post in the medians...When you go to Charlotte, Atlanta, Charleston you see them for miles...But the ones in Columbia are like on the side of the road and last for like a mile...You can see where they are supposed to go with the wires sticking but theres nothing there...it would be nice for more lighting

Edited by sonofaque86, 12 April 2005 - 12:43 PM.


#20 Jerseyman4

Jerseyman4

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,084 posts
  • Location:NC High Country

Posted 12 April 2005 - 11:26 AM

I am implying the rural interstates are not like how NC is. The urban interstates are fine, infact ive said before they are very good. I am in no way putting down the palmetto state. I have said before that SCDOT, despite being the lowest funded DOT in the country is doing the best they can with their roads.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users