Charlotte-Douglas Airport (CLT) Expansion
#21
Posted 28 April 2004 - 08:40 PM
The expansion will be financed by a PFC...so no increase in fees to the airlines, and the CLT Airport is self supporting and does not depend on any City taxes....All the financial banks are happy with this deal...in fact they have upgraded Charlotte/Douglas' credit rating. I think that speaks voulmes for the excellant people running our airport, especially when you consider that our main airline is financially junk status.
#22
Posted 28 April 2004 - 09:24 PM
#23
Posted 28 April 2004 - 11:06 PM
CLT doesn't need to extend concourse E if US Air is going to cut service, which is likely.
#24
Posted 29 April 2004 - 03:58 AM
#25
Posted 29 April 2004 - 05:59 AM
#26
Posted 29 April 2004 - 08:00 AM
heckles, on Apr 29 2004, 12:05 AM, said:
CLT doesn't need to extend concourse E if US Air is going to cut service, which is likely.
Granted in the future USAir may cut back on mainline service to Charlotte...however USAir has long term leases on most of it's gates...so they dictate what happens at their gates in the other concourses.
Councourse E is completely controlled by the city....so if USAir pulls out tomorrow, then Concourse E can be used by another airline.
#27
Posted 29 April 2004 - 05:28 PM
#28
Posted 29 April 2004 - 06:16 PM
#29
Posted 06 May 2004 - 07:04 AM
#30
Posted 07 May 2004 - 04:08 PM
#31
Posted 07 May 2004 - 08:46 PM
#32
Posted 09 May 2004 - 11:41 AM
#33
Posted 09 May 2004 - 05:44 PM
#34
Posted 15 May 2004 - 07:03 PM
#35
Posted 15 May 2004 - 10:28 PM
#36
Posted 16 May 2004 - 04:12 PM
#37
Posted 17 May 2004 - 07:14 AM
And anyone who has recently parked at Charlotte Douglas knows that it needs more parking. On a regular basis all the parking lots fill up at the airport, and parking demand is only going to increase as our population increases and if/when low fare carriers come here then local passenger traffic will increase and thereby requireing even more parking.
I think the people running CLT know what they are doing, and I think these projects are warranted no matter what happens to USAirways.
#38
Posted 29 May 2004 - 09:41 AM
Charlotte:
Quote
hub will permit more Caribbean service and will allow for
more growth of both domestic and international service. It will
operate closer to a traditional hub with more banks, but with
some flattening, or de-peaking of flights, to add efficiency.
Conversion to a point-to-point operation in Charlotte would
have required a significant reduction in the number of flights
and destinations as the local market is not large enough.
Instead, US Airways will grow Charlotte and make it our
primary connecting operation.
I thought I'd also include the paragraphs about PIT and PHL too.
Pittsburgh:
Quote
traditional hub, but instead become a focus city, with
US Airways remaining the leading carrier there, but with fewer
flights and nonstop destinations. As the leading airline in
Pittsburgh US Airways will continue to serve cities where
people in Pittsburgh travel frequently and offer them lower
fares in the process. Smaller markets that have little demand to
and from Pittsburgh likely will lose service. In some situations,
service to these smaller cities will be maintained to
Philadelphia or Charlotte. The final mix of regional jet
departures versus mainline jets will be determined upon how
much local demand there is to and from Pittsburgh.
Quote
meaning domestic flights will not be bunched up in
waves to accommodate connections, but scheduled more on a
“rolling” basis targeted at local customers. Feed for
transatlantic and Caribbean flights, however, will continue. Depeaking
the schedule will allow US Airway to expand the
number of flights it offers in Philadelphia while maintaining or
improving reliability.
#39
Posted 29 May 2004 - 11:09 AM
#40
Posted 29 May 2004 - 07:36 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













