West Morehead Projects
#361
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:14 PM
#362
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:23 PM
orulz, on 01 March 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
Agreed that it may make good sense for CP&F as a business owner. I don't fault them for doing it and congratulations on having the financial prowess. What's shocking is the $21.6M buy BEFORE the rezoning is in hand. How does a Buyer conclude that they can safely spend more than $21M on land that must be rezoned from a district which supports all suggested future land uses in every current plan (MUDD) to I-1 and 1-2, industrial districts abandoned over 10 years ago when planning efforts for the area first launched in earnest.
#363
Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:12 AM
Conformity, on 09 April 2012 - 04:23 PM, said:
Do you ever follow Charlotte's City Council? Less than a handful of rezoning requests are ever denied. A protest petition increases the odds some for denial. Still, even a majority of the protested cases end up being approved.
#364
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:37 AM
southslider, on 10 April 2012 - 07:12 AM, said:
I understand how it is likely to behave. Just getting it out there for discussion. In the spirit of full disclosure, I own with partners the piece at Elliot and Morehead which is entirely surrounded by the parcels we are discussing.
#365
Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:24 AM
#366
Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:35 PM
I'm so glad we lost the Coffee Cup for such amazing progress. Can't wait for the gunpowder-smelling pollution to increase. It adds such a nice ambiance to downtown.
http://charmeck.org/...s/2012-038.aspx
#367
Posted 20 April 2012 - 02:08 PM
#368
Posted 25 April 2012 - 09:41 AM
#369
Posted 26 April 2012 - 04:38 AM
rworkman09, on 20 April 2012 - 02:08 PM, said:
I don't know that I would call it prime. It's cut off from most of uptown, is right by CP&F, and is within 1/3 of a mile from two major highways... It sure wouldn't be my ideal place to live/work/shop. But then again what do I know, one of the more affluential areas of Charlotte is right by the wastewater treatment facility.
#370
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:14 AM
DEnd, on 26 April 2012 - 04:38 AM, said:
#371
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:50 AM
#372
Posted 26 April 2012 - 09:42 AM
Windsurfer, on 26 April 2012 - 07:50 AM, said:
#373
Posted 26 April 2012 - 09:46 AM
All of the old buildings that could have allowed for organic growth (like has happened west of 77) have all been torn down thanks to CMPD, BofA, and Beazer. So then it requires some bigger investment, which is now next to impossible.
This area easily could have been something, but in the end, it is a symbol of everything going wrong and going very far backwards.
#374
Posted 26 April 2012 - 10:15 AM
rworkman09, on 26 April 2012 - 09:42 AM, said:
Could be several if you knew where to look. I have a feeling St. Catherine's was probably plugged with debris and bulldozed over. There have even been some cave-ins through the years. Here's the prior thread with map: http://www.urbanplan...tte-gold-mines/
#375
Posted 26 April 2012 - 12:12 PM
Anyhow, once again I find everyones attitude somewhat puzzling. Developement cheerleaders, as long as it's pretty and doesn't smell or have big trucks roaring by. I have stated before y'all want lots of development as long as it is the kind you want. Would this create jobs? Is it a factory? I've scanned back thru this thread & couldn't tell. So, blue collar workers, who make the things that make it possible for inner cities to exist must work far out in the country side. Companies do not build there facilities near up/down town because of the cost of land. Mass transit offers nothing for them. The inner cities will be full of well off urbanites living and working there. But the blue collar be damned. Go find your hovel in those hideous housing developments you all despise.
#376
Posted 26 April 2012 - 03:41 PM
nashbill, on 26 April 2012 - 12:12 PM, said:
Anyhow, once again I find everyones attitude somewhat puzzling. Developement cheerleaders, as long as it's pretty and doesn't smell or have big trucks roaring by. I have stated before y'all want lots of development as long as it is the kind you want. Would this create jobs? Is it a factory? I've scanned back thru this thread & couldn't tell. So, blue collar workers, who make the things that make it possible for inner cities to exist must work far out in the country side. Companies do not build there facilities near up/down town because of the cost of land. Mass transit offers nothing for them. The inner cities will be full of well off urbanites living and working there. But the blue collar be damned. Go find your hovel in those hideous housing developments you all despise.
Someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













