Jump to content


Why haven't you registered yet?

Registration is quick, easy and completely FREE! Click the Create Account button located at the top-right to sign-up and receive additional benefits that existing members are already receiving!

Photo
- - - - -

834 Lake Drive - Bethel Church Conversion to Apts


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 GRDadof3

GRDadof3

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 18,111 posts
  • Location:Metro Grand Rapids

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:42 AM

From a press release from Wolverine Construction:

 

January 18, 2013 (Grand Rapids, MI) – Brookstone Capital, Wolverine Building Group, and Progressive AE are pleased to announce an adaptive re-use renovation that will  transform the Bethel Pentecostal Church at 834 Lake Drive SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49506, into a 37-unit apartment building.

 

Originally constructed in 1923 and expanded in 1967, the church was home to several congregations throughout its 90-year history.  The adaptive reuse renovation will retain the main façade including the exterior brickwork and columns of the original building, and add a contemporary-style two-story addition on top of the existing 1967 addition for a total of four stories.  Construction will begin February 2013; completion of the 51,000 square foot residential building is anticipated at the end of this year, December 2013.

 

Located in the East Hills neighborhood, future residents will be within walking distance of local parks, schools, retail stores, and restaurants.  “This is a great use for the church building, and it will be good for the area,” says Wolverine’s Senior Project Manager Aaron Jonker. “It’s a progressive neighborhood, with a number of retail, office, and service establishments and variety of dining destinations within a very walkable distance of the newly renovated building.”

 

Construction trailer on site:

 

https://sphotos-a.xx...136604181_n.jpg



 

#2 RegalTDP

RegalTDP

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 706 posts
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:53 AM

Not bad!  :thumbsup:  Interesting that they will be adding 2 stories.

 

Question:  Are all the adjacent surface parking lots part of the old church's property?  If so, I wonder what will become of them.


Edited by RegalTDP, 19 January 2013 - 12:12 PM.


#3 GR_Urbanist

GR_Urbanist

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts

Posted 19 January 2013 - 01:41 PM

That big one to the west would make a great infill opportunity, extending the retail portion of E. Hills to the NW, or just some new residential would work too.

 

Are there any renderings of what the finished project is expected to look like?



#4 GRDadof3

GRDadof3

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 18,111 posts
  • Location:Metro Grand Rapids

Posted 19 January 2013 - 06:31 PM

That big one to the west would make a great infill opportunity, extending the retail portion of E. Hills to the NW, or just some new residential would work too.

 

Are there any renderings of what the finished project is expected to look like?

 

I've been asking....



#5 GRDadof3

GRDadof3

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 18,111 posts
  • Location:Metro Grand Rapids

Posted 19 January 2013 - 06:35 PM

Not bad!  :thumbsup:  Interesting that they will be adding 2 stories.

 

Question:  Are all the adjacent surface parking lots part of the old church's property?  If so, I wonder what will become of them.

 

 

It shows the church, and the two lots next door to the East, are owned by the same LLC.

 

If you ever want to know who owns what parcels in Kent County, gvmc-regis.org is a great resource. Scroll down to "Parcel Finder" and a map will come up. You can either zoom in or enter the address you're looking for. 

 

You can then take the permanent parcel # (or address) and then go to here: https://www.accesskent.com/Property/ and look up tax records, sale records, lots of interesting stuff.



#6 jas49503

jas49503

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 550 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids, MI

Posted 20 January 2013 - 07:11 PM

you can get the same info off access kent. if you pull up the map of a parcel, any parcel, there is an option to get info on any parcel that you click on. all you need to know is a location somewhat  near what you are looking for. I guess that you could use any parcel at all, even your own, but if it isn't near by what you are looking for then you will have to pan over to the desired parcel.

 

there is a lot more information on the grand rapids tax assessors site than on access kent.  several of the surrounding areas have similar websites. they all seem to be run  by the same company as it has a very similar look and feel to grand rapids.


Edited by jas49503, 20 January 2013 - 07:13 PM.


#7 GRDadof3

GRDadof3

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 18,111 posts
  • Location:Metro Grand Rapids

Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:08 PM

you can get the same info off access kent. if you pull up the map of a parcel, any parcel, there is an option to get info on any parcel that you click on. all you need to know is a location somewhat  near what you are looking for. I guess that you could use any parcel at all, even your own, but if it isn't near by what you are looking for then you will have to pan over to the desired parcel.

 

there is a lot more information on the grand rapids tax assessors site than on access kent.  several of the surrounding areas have similar websites. they all seem to be run  by the same company as it has a very similar look and feel to grand rapids.

 

I hate the interactive map that the city of GR has. It never seems to work right.



#8 Raildudes dad

Raildudes dad

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 928 posts
  • Location:Walker

Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:29 PM

I hate the interactive map that the city of GR has. It never seems to work right.

Try Kent County Geospatial - same mapping info as Regis but with a direct link to AcessKent for parcel info. I haven't used Regis in a long time.


Edited by Raildudes dad, 20 January 2013 - 08:30 PM.


#9 jas49503

jas49503

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 550 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids, MI

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:35 AM

Try Kent County Geospatial - same mapping info as Regis but with a direct link to AcessKent for parcel info. I haven't used Regis in a long time.

I think that's the one i was talking about. I usually access it through the accesskent website. I have never used the GR one.



#10 GRDadof3

GRDadof3

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 18,111 posts
  • Location:Metro Grand Rapids

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:25 AM

Try Kent County Geospatial - same mapping info as Regis but with a direct link to AcessKent for parcel info. I haven't used Regis in a long time.

 

Regis did a redesign just recently, it's pretty good (looks a lot like Geospatial, thanks for the tip).



#11 GRDadof3

GRDadof3

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 18,111 posts
  • Location:Metro Grand Rapids

Posted 24 January 2013 - 09:48 AM

Designs are out, and they're...interesting.

 

http://www.rapidgrow...tments0124.aspx



#12 GR_Urbanist

GR_Urbanist

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts

Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:10 PM

If the developer of this thing happens to read UPGR, can you please post and tell us that the front of that building is just some sort of joke?

 

Seriously, what were you drinking that caused you to think that this actually was "good"? Is it just a lack of skill or money with developers/architects in GR where they keep churning out this crap?



#13 tSlater

tSlater

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,717 posts
  • Location:Plainfield Twp

Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:30 PM

This reminds me of a photo I saw on facebook today.

 

architectsdilemna_zps009db604.jpg



#14 SupercityGR

SupercityGR

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 330 posts
  • Location:up in the air

Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:33 PM

The pics are to vague to tell how its going to look. It might end up looking better in person!



#15 GaryP

GaryP

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,047 posts
  • Location:GR, MI

Posted 24 January 2013 - 03:02 PM

I bet it will look just like Brookstone's Metropolitan Park apartments down on ionia, built on top of the church. I tought that building looked okay when it was new, but now I think it looks kind of dirty; like it needs a power wash or something.

 

I'm glad to see Brookstone do a project outside of downtown. It will be nice to have some LIHTC apartments in this neighborhood, however I am definitely in the camp that believes downtown is becoming overwhelmed by income restricted apartments.



#16 RegalTDP

RegalTDP

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 706 posts
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 24 January 2013 - 05:53 PM

Interesting color scheme, to say the least.

 

I was wondering what they were going to do about resident parking... Are they going to use a surface lot?  That'd be kind of weird, to have a lot of residents' cars sitting there on Lake Drive, next to the building.  Even if they put a gate around it.

 

I was hoping they would build a gated garage into the ground floor of the contemporary side of the building.  Pretty far fetched, but it'd be cool.



#17 gvsusean

gvsusean

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 25 January 2013 - 01:09 AM

What the cluster f&^! is that?



#18 Veloise

Veloise

    City

  • Members+
  • 5,187 posts
  • Location:Happy homeowner in Midtown Grand Rapids

Posted 25 January 2013 - 08:56 AM

... I was wondering what they were going to do about resident parking... Are they going to use a surface lot?  That'd be kind of weird, to have a lot of residents' cars sitting there on Lake Drive, next to the building.  Even if they put a gate around it.

 

I was hoping they would build a gated garage into the ground floor of the contemporary side of the building.  Pretty far fetched, but it'd be cool.

Surface lots are in abundance.



#19 RegalTDP

RegalTDP

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 706 posts
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 25 January 2013 - 09:18 AM

Surface lots are in abundance.

 

I was also hoping they would get rid of those lots.  What I meant was I didn't think using one of the lots facing Lake Drive for resident parking is attractive to renters.  If the basement-level garage is out of the question, maybe they can fit parking it behind the building, and put up a gate.


Edited by RegalTDP, 25 January 2013 - 09:18 AM.


#20 CarpenterJoseph

CarpenterJoseph

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Jerusalem

Posted 25 January 2013 - 03:56 PM

The buildings kind of reminds me of Sloth from the Goonies, with his weird shaped head and all. 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users