CtownMikey, on Jul 6 2005, 10:37 AM, said:
question...
Could anyone ever see Providence being capable of hosting the Olympics??!!??
It has been done by cities of populations under 500,000 before, so why not Providence??
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Fancy that!
In reality, though, the Olympic Committee has made strong statements to the effect that only mega-metros will be acceptable for the forseeable future due to the resources it takes to pull off an Olympics. The trouble that Atlanta and especially Athens had in pulling off the games are the big reasons (despite the fact that the Athens effort was largely successful, even though construction stopped like hours before opening). Looks at this year's finalists: London, Paris, NYC...
Frankly, I'm kind of down on the whole Olympics thing... It's soooo big business, so technology and steroid boosted, so marketing saturated, that I don't really see the point anymore. It's just an event for the sake of an event. I'd rather go watch the RI high school finals for true amateur sports that give you a sense of people's hard work, efforts, and emotions... Not the pre-canned, amphetamine boosted, Nike-packaged, bribed-official Olympics.
- Garris