A new tower for Columbia?
#41
Posted 18 December 2005 - 11:22 AM
#43
Posted 18 December 2005 - 11:40 AM
803metlife, on Dec 18 2005, 09:00 AM, said:
I actually think it's because reporters at The State don't know anything about investigative reporting!
#44
Posted 18 December 2005 - 02:52 PM
803metlife, on Dec 18 2005, 09:00 AM, said:
#45
Posted 18 January 2006 - 01:09 AM
Metro Hall in Toronto
#46
Posted 23 February 2006 - 01:42 AM
Edited by krazeeboi, 23 February 2006 - 01:47 AM.
#47
Posted 23 February 2006 - 06:18 PM
#48
Posted 23 February 2006 - 08:01 PM
#50
Posted 23 February 2006 - 08:32 PM
#51
Posted 24 February 2006 - 06:29 PM
#52
Posted 24 February 2006 - 07:00 PM
Hek, I didn't even know that SCANA was in the Wachovia building until recently.
#53
Posted 24 February 2006 - 07:27 PM
#54
Posted 24 February 2006 - 08:44 PM
But SCANA definitely sounds like it will be relocating to the 'burbs, no question.
Edited by krazeeboi, 24 February 2006 - 08:44 PM.
#55
Posted 24 February 2006 - 11:27 PM
#56
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:23 AM
pricemiller, on Feb 24 2006, 07:29 PM, said:
#57
Posted 25 February 2006 - 01:53 PM
What's best for their customer's is for them to make their presence known. They could really stick out their chests by building a tower with thier moniker slapped on it. SCANA is the only Fortune 500 company in Columbia (the last time I checked) and it needs to start acting like it.
I agreed totally with your comments.
#58
Posted 04 March 2006 - 02:13 PM
#59
Posted 05 March 2006 - 12:01 AM
Edited by emerging.me, 05 March 2006 - 12:20 AM.
#60
Posted 05 March 2006 - 12:05 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













