73 replies to this topic

[Fellowmann20]

Memphis or Nashville?

[Fellowmann20]

In our opinion the Memphis interstate system is a lot less complex.  Nashville has an interstate interchange every couple of miles, and a lot of them are under construction. Also a lot of people in Nashville do not know how to drive.  It always seems like they are on the edge of their seats.  Although Memphis has a lot of incompleted interstates it is still not as confusing as Nashville's tangle of interstate.

P.S. IF ANY ONE KNOWS HOW TO POST PICTURES PLEASE TELL US.

Edited by Memphis Twins, 30 June 2005 - 10:19 AM.

[cdarr]

Memphis Twins, on Jun 30 2005, 09:59 AM, said:

Memphis or Nashville?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

In terms of design, I would have to say Nashville.  It has the benefit of more total miles and major interchanges that (in my experience) seem to be able to be engineered correctly for their traffic load.  Also, no matter where you are in metropolitan Nashville you seem to be fairly close to an interstate (except maybe Sumner County).

Memphis' interstate system suffers from the fact that it was not completed as designed.  There are three Memphis interchanges (40/240 east, 40/240 midtown and 55/Crump/Bridge) where the main expressway essentially stops at the interchange and through traffic is forced to use single-lane ramps, designed only for local traffic.  However, projects are underway or in planning to fix all three interchanges and once that's done and the I-269 bypass is built, Memphis should have a very efficient system.  Once concern is that running I-69 traffic down Midtown 240 and Whitehaven/Southaven 55 will add to congestion there.

[cheeriokid61]

I've never seen Memphis's interstate system, but knowing Nashville's, it has to be better. Considering that if you want to continue on I-65 through town, you have to go on I-40, I-25, I-440, and a couple others, I would say it's very messed up. Just my opinion though. I don't drive.

[Fellowmann20]

cheeriokid61, on Jun 30 2005, 11:37 AM, said:

I've never seen Memphis's interstate system, but knowing Nashville's, it has to be better. Considering that if you want to continue on I-65 through town, you have to go on I-40, I-25, I-440, and a couple others, I would say it's very messed up. Just my opinion though. I don't drive.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

We don't drive either, but we have been to Nashville and it looks like a maze to us.
To us Memphis's interstate isn't so confusing.

[smeagolsfree]

Right now I would say Memphis is better because of not being as confusing to drive through as  Nashville. If you dont know the roads and the correct lane to be in,  you could be on the wrong road and not even know it. The worst part of the  Nashville system is the I40/I24 route that runs together through downtown. The state is working hard to fix the system around town, but that section will always be a disaster until the get rid of it. Another problem are the inbound Interstates being widened to 4 or 5 lanes and when you get to downtown you have 2 or 3 interstates merged into 4 lanes. Sorry Nashville, but Memphis is one up on us. The interstate system has been under construction since I came here in 1995. It looks as if there will be road construction here till dooms day.

[sleepy]

Memphis Twins, on Jun 30 2005, 10:10 AM, said:

P.S. IF ANY ONE KNOWS HOW TO POST PICTURES PLEASE TELL US.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

When you go to reply, click on the "IMG" button above the box where you're writing your message.

A new box appears.  Then paste the url into that box and click OK.

[mandrws1]

I would definitely have to say Memphis.  Nashville's connections are great, but its interstate system seems to chop up the entire city.  Memphis's interstate system is very similar to those of Houston and Indianapolis.  Memphis and Houston have inner loops around the core of the city with stretches that connect downtown and outer loops for access to the suburbs.  The only difference is that downtown Memphis isn't in the center of the city.  Memphis' outer loop is only half finished, but when TN 385 is finished it will form the outer loop that stretches from Millington to Collierville via a couple of miles through Fayette County.  It will eventually become I-269 and will connect with Mississippi through Marshall County with a connection for the future I-22 that will directly connect Memphis and Atlanta.  All of which is in progress now.


http://www.i69info.com/memphis.html

Edited by mandrws1, 30 June 2005 - 02:45 PM.

[smeagolsfree]

TO: TourNashville
I am trying to look at this from an objective standpoint. The Nashville interstate system was designed in the 50's. It is not very well planned at all. If you would take a look at the plan of Nashville, you would see they want to dig the 3 interstates up that run into  downtown Nashville and turn them into a tree lined blvd.. As for as not liking to drive, well I have driven well over a million miles and in most every large city in the coutry. I know a disaster when I see one. Another big problem with the interstate here, is the fact that I-440 is too close to the downtown area and 840 is too far out.

[sleepy]

tournashville, on Jun 30 2005, 02:19 PM, said:

the quotes from above just answer this discussion in whole. "memhphis is not as confusing", this is a quote from people who dont like to drive and who do not have a vast knowledge of what an interstate system is suppost to be and how it is suppost to work. go to any major city(except memhis) and you will find a vast interconnecting interstate system that connects you to all major and most minor parts of the city to get people to and from where they need to go. memphis lacks heavily in this area because they "had" a large scale prject that would create a large interstate system to connect the different parts of the city to eachother, but was in turn, never built, and that is very evident when your driving in town, and all of the sudden, the highway turns into a secondary almost immediatly.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Outside Memphis' loop the suburban areas are well connected with freeways.

In the early 70's (the re-routing of I-40) it was decided that the use of a freeway to "connect you to all major and most minor parts of the city to get people to and from where they need to go" was an inappropriate use of transportation resources for the innercity (within the loop).  In other words, the decision was that freeways aren't needed to take a 5 mile trip within a central city.

I think that decision was farsighted and to Memphis' credit.  Plowing I-40 through Overton Park and Midtown would have destroyed at least 2 historic districts and blighted the area.

Additionally, within the loop, Memphis has excellent arterial roads for making those 5 mile trips.

smeagolsfree, on Jun 30 2005, 06:16 PM, said:

TO: TourNashville
I am trying to look at this from an objective standpoint. The Nashville interstate system was designed in the 50's. It is not very well planned at all. If you would take a look at the plan of Nashville, you would see they want to dig the 3 interstates up that run into  downtown Nashville and turn them into a tree lined blvd.. As for as not liking to drive, well I have driven well over a million miles and in most every large city in the coutry. I know a disaster when I see one. Another big problem with the interstate here, is the fact that I-440 is too close to the downtown area and 840 is too far out.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I agree.  Nashville needed an inner loop extending about 6-7 miles from downtown, with an outer loop closer in than 840.

[rocket9561]

I agree.  Nashville needed an inner loop extending about 6-7 miles from downtown, with an outer loop closer in than 840.
[right]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/right]
[/quote]


What about Briley Pkwy?

[Fellowmann20]

smeagolsfree, on Jun 30 2005, 07:16 PM, said:

TO: TourNashville
I am trying to look at this from an objective standpoint. The Nashville interstate system was designed in the 50's. It is not very well planned at all. If you would take a look at the plan of Nashville, you would see they want to dig the 3 interstates up that run into  downtown Nashville and turn them into a tree lined blvd.. As for as not liking to drive, well I have driven well over a million miles and in most every large city in the coutry. I know a disaster when I see one. Another big problem with the interstate here, is the fact that I-440 is too close to the downtown area and 840 is too far out.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

We agree with you smeagolsfree I-440 is too close to downtown Nashville and I-840 is too far out.  

[satalac]

Memphis Twins, on Jun 30 2005, 09:07 PM, said:

We agree with you smeagolsfree I-440 is too close to downtown Nashville and I-840 is too far out. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

i'd give 840 about 10 years, then see what happens. that area is exploding right now. it's also much faster from murfreesboro to franklin than taking 96. and now those in murfreesboro don't have to drive northwest to nashville so they can drive east to knoxville.

[sleepy]

Deleted

Edited by sleepy, 30 June 2005 - 10:15 PM.

[sleepy]

Doesn't Briley Parkway just loop around the northern half of town?

[tournashville]

smeagolsfree : the plan of nashville is not a go project, and most likely wont be. it is only as it says "a plan" one of the many propsed, this would deter traffic onto avenues and further complicate things. the only reason people think nashville's interestate systems are messed up is mainly because traffic. yes, this is a problem, and that is why we are fixing it by widening highways and adding more secondaries. this will take care of what people lightly see when they just pass through nash and think they have it all figured out.

Memphis Twins: who is we?

satalac : your right, this area is booming heavily right now, this is why we put 840 "so far out" **rolls eyes, lol, the projected growth in nashville is taking place here, this is to support the traffic in the area that is up and coming.

sleepy : briley loops around north and east of downtowm, 440 takes care of the souther part of town.

[sleepy]

tournashville, on Jun 30 2005, 10:22 PM, said:

sleepy : briley loops around north and east of downtowm, 440 takes care of the souther part of town.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yes, I know where 440 is--not far enough out to be part of what I considered to be a 6-7 mile inner loop.  And to get on 440 from Briley, at least on the west side, requires you to get on I-40 and head east towards downtown which sorta defeats the purpose of a loop.

[sleepy]

Lol.  

Just now got around to reading the poll language:

"Which city(Memphis or Nashville) has better commute times and less traffic jams on their interstate"

Most likely Memphis since it's not as spread out and has a more utilized public transportation system.

[tournashville]

looks like nashville is in the lead with 11 to 8, it seems others agree with me and agree that nashville takes care of transportation a lot better than memphis.  

Edited by tournashville, 01 July 2005 - 02:00 AM.

[GaTechGuy]

Over all I'd say both cities aren't too bad with travel times. Of course I live in Atlanta now so it doesn't take much to beat Atlanta in that race.