3 replies to this topic

[jlblaes]

Annual Estimates of the Population - Ranked by July 1, 2004 Population
Raleigh Ranked 55
Annual Estimates of the Population for Incorporated Places over 100,000, Ranked by July 1, 2004 Population: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004


Percent Change Population April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004 - Ranked by Percent Change
Raleigh Ranked 22
Cumulative Estimates of Population Change for Incorporated Places over 100,000, Ranked by Percent Change: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004


Percent Change Population July 1, 2003 to July 1, 2004 - Ranked by Percent Change
Raleigh Ranked 24
Annual Estimates of Population Change for Incorporated Places over 100,000, Ranked by Percent Change: July 1, 2003 to July 1, 2004

[triguyrdu]

I didn't realize Miami city and Raleigh were practically the same for population.  cool!

[orulz]

That has less to do with the actual population of the city and more to do with North Carolina's liberal annexation laws.

[IBruton]

In the percent of change, notice that Raleigh is the first "major" city in the list.  Meaning that the other cities do not have the national status that Raleigh holds and that the others are smaller parts of a larger metro.  Whereas, Raleigh is the central/largest city in its metro area.