Newport News Development
#481
Posted 24 October 2008 - 08:36 AM
From today's inRich:
http://www.inrich.co...10-24-0118.html
#482
Posted 22 April 2009 - 07:45 PM
New proposed mixed use development for Oyster Point. Same developer as Short Pump in Richmond. Retail, Condos, and Office Space.
T
Quote
"The site is really one of the best sites I've ever been involved in," he said. "It's the transition point between the retail corridor to the office corridor. That's a perfect spot for a mixed-use and lifestyle development."
S.J. Collins, based in Fairburn, Ga., built an 88,000-square-foot shopping center in Short Pump, near Richmond, and is developing a 470,000-square-foot center in Charlottesville. The company was founded in 2007.
Despite the troubled economy, Garrison said he doesn't expect any problems securing financing for the project.
If approved, the Newport News site would also include a 150-room hotel and 50,000 square feet of office space.
Garrison said the development firm is in final lease negotiations with several tenants but would not release the names of the retailers.
"We are always looking for sites for our core retailers," Garrison said. "One of our retailers has been eyeing this market for a number of years."
#483
Posted 03 May 2009 - 02:55 PM
This is over a week old, but an interesting look at the prosperity of Newport News during tough times. It was written by the AP.
Quote
#484
Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:59 PM
Quote
A unanimous City Council vote on Tuesday that rezoned the property paved the way for Jefferson Market Place. The owners of developer Jeff Bland LLC said traffic concerns were addressed by having the parking lot for the apartments accessible only from Boykin Lane.
Don Smith, one of the partners for Jeff Bland, said the revised plan is better for traffic than the original zoning, which would have allowed a massive retailer. The zoning changed from retail to mixed-use.
"If you had stuck a big-box store there, the traffic wouldn't have worked," Smith said.
But Joan Minarik, who lives near the proposed development, said that no matter what, many extra people living there will add to the congestion problems on Jefferson Avenue. "It's a big problem for the whole area," Minarik said.
Good, with more congestion means much more of a case for light rail in newport News
http://www.dailypres...,0,510702.story
#485
Posted 14 April 2010 - 12:58 PM
http://www.dailypres...0,5659286.story
#486
Posted 14 April 2010 - 06:28 PM
calwinston, on 14 April 2010 - 12:58 PM, said:
http://www.dailypres...0,5659286.story
This provides "export" (basic) employment with a high multiplier effect, with a high propensity for a local industry clusters to emerge, thus creating higher economies of agglomeration which create cost savings for the lab (due to backwards & forward linkages) and a higher economic spillover effect for the region. Also these wages pay very high and help reduce the "brain drain" for any local scientists in this field, as well as promote more research related academic ventures among our local institutions of higher education. This also creates wage-competition for related academics who have the good fortune of choosing to either work at the lab or with a nearby university. Lastly ventures like these could possibly be linked with workforce development programs (which have shown to be successful for pharmaceutical-related research industries in Boston). This venture also further diversifies the economic base and gives temporary stimulus to the local contractors, builders and local folks associated with soft-costs.
I only mentioning all of this because we often act like we need all of these activities in our area and maybe are sometimes unaware of their very existence.
#487
Posted 06 July 2010 - 12:39 PM
Quote
"The ramp-up to two-per-year production is a great opportunity for the Virginia Class program and Northrup Grumman," Stewart said. "It will provide more stability in our production schedules, more stability for our vendors and more jobs."
To prepare for the doubling of production, the yard will spend more than $200 million on the construction of a 70,000-square-foot outfitting building, a materials facility and new tools and equipment, Stewart said.
The outfitting building, called the Supplemental Module Outfitting Facility, is expected to open in October 2012. Stewart said it is "an essential component" in meeting cost and schedule goals, as it will allow the yard to increase indoor production capacity and boost efficiency.
#488
Posted 06 July 2010 - 12:44 PM
Quote
#489
Posted 06 July 2010 - 04:10 PM
calwinston, on 06 July 2010 - 12:44 PM, said:
http://www.virginiab...-7-6-10/242414/
I saw this in the newspaper awhile back (a blurb or something, nothing overly specific). The city (as articulated by someone -- I don't recall exactly) is hoping this school will become a catalyst for further development downtown; eventually shops and restaurants will combine with apartments near the school. I don't anticipate downtown Newport News will exactly explode with development... but it can't get much worse, really, so I welcome it. Plus, the influx of all that money into the city's economy can't hurt either.
#490
Posted 08 July 2010 - 03:18 PM
calwinston, on 06 July 2010 - 12:39 PM, said:
http://www.dailypres...,0,813007.story
http://hamptonroads....exico?cid=posld
#491
Posted 21 March 2011 - 10:34 AM
P.S. The government will be spending less!!!
http://hamptonroads....ipyard-projects
http://hamptonroads....orthrop-grumman
#492
Posted 10 July 2011 - 02:45 PM
Here's my favorite (ahem...) quote from this Daily Press article about Jefferson Marketplace, a mixed-use, retail/residential development near the Newport News airport:
Quote
“There’s something to be said for allowing the private sector to work,” Meredith said. “Let them figure out where the supply and demand is at.”
I wrote an extensive criticism of the article -- and of the lack of a comprehensive development plan for the city -- here, but I'll replicate the upshot in a little less-verbose form. This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read from a city planner. Translation: "I'm a visionless city planner, so let the market decide what is built, when, where, and how, since they seem to know better." With all due respect to Ms. Meredith, she needs her head examined and her position with the City of Newport News should be reconsidered.
Implicit in her words, Carol Meredith is arguing that (re)development should be dictated by the market, not the city. Is that not what the last decade of urban development across the US precisely did, with rather disastrous outcomes from Las Vegas to Miami, the valleys of California to Atlanta? Lack of regulation in housing markets and a lack of comprehensive, controlled urban planning proved just as disastrous as the lack of financial market regulation; left to their own devices, private interests have far less interest in the public good than in their own bottom line -- and, frankly, appropriately so. I'm not making a negative value judgment about the perils of private motives but rather making an argument that the role of city planners is to ensure the public good, guiding private development toward that end, rather than allowing private development to run rampant. Private development "run rampant" very succinctly describes the last decade of development for the City of Newport News and I hope they give serious reconsideration to not only Ms. Meredith's position with the city, but the overall (lack of) vision for the future.
Edited by PeninsulaKiddo, 10 July 2011 - 02:58 PM.
#493
Posted 11 July 2011 - 07:11 PM
PeninsulaKiddo, on 10 July 2011 - 02:45 PM, said:
Here's my favorite (ahem...) quote from this Daily Press article about Jefferson Marketplace, a mixed-use, retail/residential development near the Newport News airport:
I wrote an extensive criticism of the article -- and of the lack of a comprehensive development plan for the city -- here, but I'll replicate the upshot in a little less-verbose form. This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read from a city planner. Translation: "I'm a visionless city planner, so let the market decide what is built, when, where, and how, since they seem to know better." With all due respect to Ms. Meredith, she needs her head examined and her position with the City of Newport News should be reconsidered.
Implicit in her words, Carol Meredith is arguing that (re)development should be dictated by the market, not the city. Is that not what the last decade of urban development across the US precisely did, with rather disastrous outcomes from Las Vegas to Miami, the valleys of California to Atlanta? Lack of regulation in housing markets and a lack of comprehensive, controlled urban planning proved just as disastrous as the lack of financial market regulation; left to their own devices, private interests have far less interest in the public good than in their own bottom line -- and, frankly, appropriately so. I'm not making a negative value judgment about the perils of private motives but rather making an argument that the role of city planners is to ensure the public good, guiding private development toward that end, rather than allowing private development to run rampant. Private development "run rampant" very succinctly describes the last decade of development for the City of Newport News and I hope they give serious reconsideration to not only Ms. Meredith's position with the city, but the overall (lack of) vision for the future.
Technically, Ms. Meredith is not a planner, but an employee in the city's [economic] development department. Economic development and planning sometimes work hand-in-hand, but in some cities, they do not. It is not the responsibility of any government entity to keep a struggling business alive. In the specific case of the department of economic development, their job is to attract businesses, jobs, and revenue-generating events to the city and keep jobs or businesses wanting to move. Again, Ms. Meredith is not a planner. She works in economic development, which is a separate department.
#494
Posted 13 July 2011 - 11:18 AM
VBIllini13, on 11 July 2011 - 07:11 PM, said:
The planner-economic development employee distinction is an important one that I failed to make, but I did not make the case that it is the city's responsibility to keep struggling businesses alive; rather, I do believe it is the city's responsibility to pursue development that is responsible rather than errant, that follows a comprehensive vision rather than allows developers to run amok. I would also still argue that her words counter her job description as a city development employee; if her job is to attract businesses, jobs, and revenue-generating events to the city, I fail to see how signing off on every proposed project in the city (irrespective of location or quality, which has been a mainstay of Newport News development) achieves that. Even though that responsibility is not hers -- she's probably an administrator, not a major driving force behind the city department's long-term work, though she may coordinate with city officials who do sign off on projects -- she still implicitly defended that lack of long-term design and planning vision that has been the hallmark of the city's development patterns. Moving businesses from strip mall to strip mall does not really count as attracting businesses. Also, if Ms. Meredith doesn't view her job as even remotely overlapping with urban planning, she should not have made the commentary she made that alludes to issues of comprehensive city planning (or the lack thereof; RE: discussion of vacancies along other Jefferson strip malls -- she made the discussion about the city government picking "winners and losers," which I do not believe reflects reality or the point of the reporter's question, which had more to do with how Jefferson Marketplace fit into the broader retail market of the city, an increasingly vacant market that is begging for redevelopment rather than new development on untouched land -- and I don't think that is the same as "picking" winners and losers, but rather setting realistic bounds for the pattern of growth which, given negligible population growth over the last decade in the city, should be a major consideration for the city. The city simply doesn't have to approve projects that don't coincide with a long-term plans for the city, whatever vision that might be that they haven't filled us in on.). I came down rather harshly on Ms. Meredith, personally, which reflects an unfair assessment of her role in the city, but also a growing cumulative frustration with the wasted potential of the city of Newport News.
Edited by PeninsulaKiddo, 13 July 2011 - 11:24 AM.
#495
Posted 13 July 2011 - 01:28 PM
#496
Posted 24 July 2011 - 08:23 PM
Toby Keith is supposed to be opening a restaurant in the Newport News City Center area. Sounds like there are talks of another movie/bowl/restaurant place.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













