I-49 One Step Closer to Being Realized
#21
Posted 18 July 2005 - 02:09 PM
#22
Posted 18 July 2005 - 02:14 PM
#23
Posted 18 July 2005 - 02:23 PM
Mith242, on Jul 18 2005, 03:09 PM, said:
Really? Tennessee has these type of roads all over. West Tennessee for example has US 51 (a lot of which is to become the new I-69), US 412, US 45/US 45E/US45W, TN 22.....which are the ones I can think of off the top of my head. Tennessee is all about some four-lane divided highways. Not to mention its getting pretty hard to find dirt or gravel roads in West Tennessee anymore, which means the counties like to pave alot too.
Edited by Rural King, 18 July 2005 - 02:24 PM.
#24
Posted 18 July 2005 - 02:57 PM
Rural King, on Jul 18 2005, 03:23 PM, said:
#25
Posted 18 July 2005 - 02:58 PM
Rural King, on Jul 18 2005, 02:23 PM, said:
That was my reaction... I'm pretty sure we have them all over Arkansas.....unless I'm totally confused on the topic...which may be the case..
#26
Posted 18 July 2005 - 03:11 PM
johnnydr87, on Jul 18 2005, 03:58 PM, said:
#27
Posted 19 July 2005 - 12:32 AM
sleepy, on Jul 18 2005, 08:11 AM, said:
No need to be miffed, but Mith asked if I-49 would extend to New Orleans, and if US 90 is upgraded to meet the status of an interstate highway, then it will. As you pointed out, it will not be a new route, and would not be the route taken from I-49 out of Arkansas. Coming from Little Rock, the best route is probably to take I-55 South from Jackson, MS.
#28
Posted 19 July 2005 - 01:36 PM
Arkansawyer, on Jul 19 2005, 01:32 AM, said:
#29
Posted 19 July 2005 - 02:26 PM
Mith242, on Jul 18 2005, 02:05 PM, said:
Yeah, I-10's a major interstate--it connects Florida, Texas, and California.
If you're coming from Arkansas down I-49, you still wouldn't go all the way south to Lafayette to get on I-10 if you were going to New Orleans. You'd get off on Hwy 169 at Opelousas which is a four lane expressway all the way to Baton Rouge where it connects to I-10. It would be about 30 or 40 miles nearer.
That southern section of I-49/Hwy 90 is basically to connect Lafayette with New Iberia, Morgan City, and Houma. If you were going from Lafayette to New Orleans you would take I-10.
Edited by sleepy, 19 July 2005 - 02:29 PM.
#30
Posted 19 July 2005 - 03:14 PM
sleepy, on Jul 19 2005, 03:26 PM, said:
If you're coming from Arkansas down I-49, you still wouldn't go all the way south to Lafayette to get on I-10 if you were going to New Orleans. You'd get off on Hwy 169 at Opelousas which is a four lane expressway all the way to Baton Rouge where it connects to I-10. It would be about 30 or 40 miles nearer.
That southern section of I-49/Hwy 90 is basically to connect Lafayette with New Iberia, Morgan City, and Houma. If you were going from Lafayette to New Orleans you would take I-10.
#31
Posted 25 July 2005 - 08:28 PM
I am hoping it would also help to relieve the traffic in Baton Rouge from everyone going to New Orleans and further westward, it would allow people coming west on I-10 to contunue on through Baton Rouge to New Orleans or get onto I-12 and skip N.O., and people coming south on I-49 to continue down through Lafayette and through Houma towards New Orleans instead of going through B.R. Anyone who travels on I-49 or I-10 frequently knows BR rush hour+heavy traffic on I-10 means little or no movement for a long time... so the new area of I-49 would allow for much of the traffic on I-10 from Lafayette to N.O. to clear up.
But....Louisiana doesnt seem to be working on I-49 from Shreveport to Texarkana, I drove up HW 71 recently to visit some family near Texarkana, and nothing is really happening on the LA side. Once you get across the border however, AR is really working on it and the construction came down to Fouke. I cant see Louisiana having I-49 going from New Orleans and just stopping in Shreveport, espesially if it is completed on the AR side..
#32
Posted 26 July 2005 - 04:12 AM
NCB, on Jul 25 2005, 09:28 PM, said:
I am hoping it would also help to relieve the traffic in Baton Rouge from everyone going to New Orleans and further westward, it would allow people coming west on I-10 to contunue on through Baton Rouge to New Orleans or get onto I-12 and skip N.O., and people coming south on I-49 to continue down through Lafayette and through Houma towards New Orleans instead of going through B.R. Anyone who travels on I-49 or I-10 frequently knows BR rush hour+heavy traffic on I-10 means little or no movement for a long time... so the new area of I-49 would allow for much of the traffic on I-10 from Lafayette to N.O. to clear up.
But....Louisiana doesnt seem to be working on I-49 from Shreveport to Texarkana, I drove up HW 71 recently to visit some family near Texarkana, and nothing is really happening on the LA side. Once you get across the border however, AR is really working on it and the construction came down to Fouke. I cant see Louisiana having I-49 going from New Orleans and just stopping in Shreveport, espesially if it is completed on the AR side..
#33
Posted 29 July 2005 - 06:25 PM
Louisiana was just granted $200 million by congress under the highway bill...and the first thing on the list is to complete I-49 from Shreveport to Arkansas..some of the money will also be used for I-49 south(most of the funding for I-49 south is already complete)
So it seems I-49 is one step closer to being complete in Louisiana....finally
#34
Posted 29 July 2005 - 06:54 PM
#35
Posted 30 July 2005 - 09:27 PM
#36
Posted 31 July 2005 - 10:26 AM
Mith242, on Jul 29 2005, 06:54 PM, said:
The I-49 corridor supposedly will replace US 71 which runs all the way to KC already. Only a short portion near the AR border hasn't already been converted to quality 4-lane highway but unlike the construction of 4-lane U.S. Highways running from LR to Pine Bluff (now I-530) and LR to Newport (US 67/167), this road was not made "interstate ready" meaning it has roads cross it without true exits. It's also pretty desolate until you reach KC. I'm not sure that Missouri is too excited about forking up the dough to convert it right after they spent quite a bit to finish out converting it to 4 lanes.
As for Arkansas, it will be very expensive to go through these mountains and really won't connect any important communities other than Ft Smith and allowing Texarkanans to get to Fayetteville for games. The river bridge in Ft Smith alone will cost $100 million. The cost to build the whole section in AR is projected to be $25,000 for every taxpayer in Arkansas. A lot of thought has gone into making this a toll road and it's really not a bad idea if they really end up building it. For a while there was consideration given to making the last piece of loop left around LR (which is fully federally funded) into a toll road to help pay for I-49 but this had central Arkansans up in arms as most of them will never use I-49.
Hey, I live in Dallas and go to Razorback games often so I'm all for it, there are just a ton of obstacles.
#37
Posted 31 July 2005 - 10:58 AM
Aporkalypse, on Jul 31 2005, 11:26 AM, said:
As for Arkansas, it will be very expensive to go through these mountains and really won't connect any important communities other than Ft Smith and allowing Texarkanans to get to Fayetteville for games. The river bridge in Ft Smith alone will cost $100 million. The cost to build the whole section in AR is projected to be $25,000 for every taxpayer in Arkansas. A lot of thought has gone into making this a toll road and it's really not a bad idea if they really end up building it. For a while there was consideration given to making the last piece of loop left around LR (which is fully federally funded) into a toll road to help pay for I-49 but this had central Arkansans up in arms as most of them will never use I-49.
Hey, I live in Dallas and go to Razorback games often so I'm all for it, there are just a ton of obstacles.
#38
Posted 31 July 2005 - 12:53 PM
Mith242, on Jul 31 2005, 10:58 AM, said:
Take a trip up to KC sometime, it's an easy 3 hr drive from NWA and it's great town to visit if you've never been there. It's 4 lane divided for all but the first county north of AR (McDonald Co). The talk is of making all of the stretch from Texarkana to Ft Smith a toll road though counts as you said will be low (which also is an argument not to build it as it is so cost prohibitive). Terrain is rough but not as rough as the Ozarks, I guess, but it has to go much further. Missouri's contribution is only for the Bella Vista part, which I think AR should ante up for and keep from being a toll road. I don't see any of us paying a toll to bypass that short, and very scenic, segment.
#39
Posted 13 April 2006 - 07:33 AM
Toll Road Approved
Edited by vbfl85, 13 April 2006 - 07:38 AM.
#40
Posted 13 April 2006 - 07:45 AM
vbfl85, on Apr 13 2006, 08:33 AM, said:
Toll Road Approved
Thanks for the update vbfl85, I wish they could have gotten this started years ago. At least it seems like it is going to become a reality finally.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













