Dallas vs Houston
#1
Posted 17 July 2005 - 05:29 AM
#2
Posted 26 August 2005 - 05:22 PM
#3
Posted 02 September 2005 - 07:58 AM
M. Brown, on Aug 26 2005, 05:22 PM, said:
Dallas cuz it's not closer to the ocean
#4
Posted 15 September 2005 - 09:39 PM
#5
Posted 16 September 2005 - 11:20 AM
#6
Posted 08 October 2005 - 12:52 PM
IMO, its just a great city in many many ways.
I really like Dallas and Austin as well, they are both very nice cities.
Edited by NCB, 08 October 2005 - 12:53 PM.
#7
Posted 08 October 2005 - 03:17 PM
But I didn't realize how little activity this thread has had - good job Texans for keeping such a potentially vicious arguement from not developing.
#8
Posted 20 November 2005 - 04:34 AM
RANKS:
4th HOUSTON
8th SAN ANTONIO
9th DALLAS
I think its only fair to include SAN ANTONIO in the POLL.
I VOTE SAN ANTONIO~~Thanks!
#9
Posted 21 November 2005 - 11:02 AM
txstate25, on Nov 20 2005, 05:34 AM, said:
RANKS:
4th HOUSTON
8th SAN ANTONIO
9th DALLAS
I think its only fair to include SAN ANTONIO in the POLL.
I VOTE SAN ANTONIO~~Thanks!
Nothing against San Antonio... It is a great place and no doubt great things are happening there.
However, it has always been Dallas vs. Houston and it will always be
San Antonio although may have more people now than Dallas, can't compete with what either city has to offer
Edited by Yuppie, 21 November 2005 - 11:03 AM.
#10
Posted 21 November 2005 - 12:25 PM
#11
Posted 27 November 2005 - 11:52 PM
txstate25, on Nov 20 2005, 04:34 AM, said:
RANKS:
4th HOUSTON
8th SAN ANTONIO
9th DALLAS
I think its only fair to include SAN ANTONIO in the POLL.
I VOTE SAN ANTONIO~~Thanks!
Well...
The DFW metroplex has 5.55 million people, Houston has 5.2 million, and SA has 1.85 million.
It's much easier to compare Dallas and Houston than SA to either. The size of the city isn't that important, remember Atlanta and Miami are smaller than El Paso. It's all about how the cities annex early on and how suburban growth develops.
#12
Posted 08 December 2005 - 12:15 PM
monsoon, on Jul 17 2005, 06:29 AM, said:
dallas, by far. but i could be a little biased, i was born and raised in dallas!
#13
Posted 20 December 2005 - 03:16 PM
Quote
That's misleading because the size of SA's city limits is HUGE in comparison to Dallas and Houston where their city limits are smaller because of the annexes.
#14
Posted 20 December 2005 - 08:54 PM
#15
Posted 21 December 2005 - 01:14 AM
(Less humid and hurricane proof.)
#16
Posted 21 December 2005 - 01:33 AM
TexasStar, on Dec 21 2005, 01:14 AM, said:
(Less humid and hurricane proof.)
Dallas hurricane proof? Not so fast!
If a tropical system hits the area just right, it can still cause a significant amount of flooding and damage. We're only about 250 miles or so from the coast--a major hurricane can still wreak havoc that far inland...though I'll give you that it won't cause nearly the havoc it could cause in Houston or other areas on the coast!
#17
Posted 24 December 2005 - 06:00 PM
#18
Posted 18 January 2006 - 04:12 PM
#19
Posted 06 March 2006 - 11:49 PM
ZachariahDaMan, on Jan 18 2006, 05:12 PM, said:
#20
Posted 28 March 2006 - 04:26 PM
TexasStar, on Dec 21 2005, 02:14 AM, said:
(Less humid and hurricane proof.)
for comfort. The only grace was a nice breeze blowing most of the time.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













