Tallahassee Regional Airport
#41
Posted 03 November 2005 - 08:33 PM
#42
Posted 03 November 2005 - 08:39 PM
Quote
It's funny but sad at the same time. I know Houston has this problem......they want all airport traffic using the Hardy Toll Road because I-45 north is just cluttered with billboards and all kind of nasty stuff
The southside area along these roads must certainly be in a CRA........why don't they give grants to these businesses for beautification and facade improvements? COT may not want people to use those routes, but all the taxis I've taken from TLH go up Spring Hill and Lake Bradford! There's not many other ways to get from the airport. I'd like to see some extensive beautification projects done around there. It'll be a big boost for residents as well. Everyone likes living in a clean, well-kept area. It can raise property values
COT should also erect some nice looking "welcome signs"......made of concrete or something that welcomes people to the city, instead of the bland "Tallahassee City Limit" sign.
#43
Posted 03 November 2005 - 08:58 PM
I think one of the strangest things is if I were to take a route from downtown to TLH and I didnt' want my passengers to see that much blight... I'd take Adams to Orange, from Orange turn left onto Lake Bradford (the road where the Reservation is) then right onto Capital Circle is where you'll find the airport. The only probelm with this route are the dern Speed Bumps every 5 inches!!! For the life of me I can't understand why they had to go to such extremes.
You're absolutely right about the property value increase. I looked down some of the roads and the homes are actually quite decent, its the businesses that front the road that make the place look like the slums.
If I drove a Code Enforcement truck I'd be slapping some heavy fines along Springhill Road, Extreme South Monroe (I think its called Woodville HWY) and Blountstown Hwt west of CC.
#44
Posted 04 November 2005 - 03:43 PM
Quote
I'm not sure what he means by this. Is this an admission that we aren't interested in luring a low-cost carrier to our airport, because if this is so we need to quickly find replacement staff. Legacy carriers, such as Delta, Continential, US Airways, American Airlines and others have not been good to our pockets.
Delta lowered its prices and drove AirTran out of town, then raised them back up when AirTran left. Delta dominates the Tallahassee market, AirTran was a close second place when it was here, but it could not compete with Delta's ability to lower their prices below a level that was profitable for them to stay here in Tallahassee.
Despite this fact however, other cities are benifiting from higher increases in passenger traffic than we are because they have low-cost carrier service. I flew AirTran 6 times during their two year stay in Tallahassee and I must say their service, while low-cost, was top notch in terms of comfort, and timeliness.
We shouldn't look down on low cost carriers. Cities like Tallahassee need them.
#45
Posted 04 November 2005 - 11:17 PM
#46
Posted 04 November 2005 - 11:44 PM
This is the type of stuff I'd write the news paper about if it weren't for UrbanPlanet, but I'm very tempted at this point to write someone.
How can he say that Discount Carriers are not critical to the future of the airline industry? What does he mean by legacy carriers are the wave of the future... they're all going bankrupt.
#47
Posted 05 November 2005 - 12:01 AM
#48
Posted 05 November 2005 - 12:08 AM
You know how there are times when government is working on something and just doesn't want to report on their progress. Or times when they've tried to lure a liner, such as AirTran or Southwest and are turned down. This is probably the root of some of these comments. Whatever the case, I'd like a little more communication on this. I think City Talk should do a new segement on the airport just to get us up to speed.
How would you rate John Marks work on the airport in reference to Scott Maddox? Scott brought us AirTran, they left under the watch of Mayor Marks.
#49
Posted 05 November 2005 - 10:46 AM
#50
Posted 05 November 2005 - 11:16 AM
Go Gators, on Nov 5 2005, 11:46 AM, said:
I think you're absolutely right.
What's the meaning behind the statements of the Assistant Director of the Airport. Did anyone else read the article and interpret it a different way?
#51
Posted 06 November 2005 - 11:56 AM
I'd like to see Spirit Airlines come to TLH. They fly to every metro area in Florida except JAX and Pensacola, but those are in driving distance anyway. They're based in South Florida, and it'd be desirable in as far as attracting students, politicians and other people around Florida to TLH. I'm sure they'd be a big hit.
I've never personally flown Spirit, but they don't seem bad at all.
#52
Posted 07 November 2005 - 03:55 PM
Edited by psycuda, 11 November 2005 - 01:24 PM.
#53
Posted 07 November 2005 - 04:00 PM
As much as I love being an island city (isloated) sometimes it can be a thorn.
Could we not offer Southwest the same incentives we offered AirTran to do a little 1-Year trial in our city to see if they'd like to serve us. What would they have to lose?
#54
Posted 08 November 2005 - 01:09 PM
Delta.
As a Platinum member of Delta, I can tell you, they feel it is unfair to subsidize their comp. You can say "who cares" and that is fine, but if Delta leaves Tally....we are screwed.
Bottom line is this. Tally has to focus on getting high paying jobs FIRST. Yes, it is a catch 22...ie you need airlines to attract jobs, etc. But the first win eventually must be better jobs.
Tally has NEVER understood it is about brining in better jobs. It has always been anti business and this situation is just one of the many fruits of that attitude. But t simply doesn't know how to do this unless they get lucky enough to ride the coatails of one of the universities (like the recent get from Canada...that was all about the Mag Lab). The city should of worked hard with FSU....pushed a REAL research park (Innovation Park is a complete bust) with FSU running it....perhaps pushing another one for FAMU right next to FSU's (so they are near each other....but with one DISTINCT boss...ie you can't have two bosses...you get nowhere).
At the end of the day....Tally simply doesn't know how to be a player with high paying jobs....and that creates a airline market that is of no interest to anyone.
#55
Posted 08 November 2005 - 01:16 PM
As far as Delta is concerned, they could leave and I bet AirTran would be knocking down the door to come back to Tallahassee. AirTran citied as a reason for leaving, that the could not compete with Delta' ability to lower cost below theirs and steal customers away. Of course you could argue its all in the name of competition, but what Delta did, in the eyes of many, was dirty. I could see if their prices stayed low, but No, Delta allowed them soar (no pun intended) upon the departure of AirTran... it was dirty and I lost my respect for Delta because of that.
#56
Posted 08 November 2005 - 03:28 PM
TaureanJ, on Nov 8 2005, 03:16 PM, said:
I realize Leon County runs IP and that is why I believe it is a failure. Either you mistyped or I don't understand what you are saying. If FSU had control of IP years ago, it would be a large source (MUCH larger than it is now) of high paying jobs. That would of been a good start for the city.
TaureanJ, on Nov 8 2005, 03:16 PM, said:
No airline will every be knocking down Tally's door begging to come or come back (as stated in your scenerio). That is pure hope as opposed to fact. I never said Delta didn't take advantage ....they did. But that doesn't change that Tally is not a desirable market for anyone...including Delta and subsidizing ANOTHER comp for them could send them packing. Doesn't matter..Tally won't get another in Tally unless high paying jobs come to Tally. Whether you respect Delta or not is COMPLETELY irrelevant...your emotions are thinking for you here (not an insult...I do this all the time). I am simply saying...Tally has ONE OPTION...Delta...period...the end.
#57
Posted 08 November 2005 - 04:23 PM
With regard to the Innovation Park thing, you made it seem as if the park belongs to FSU... but I wasn't sure if that was your intention. I believe I read and interpreted it as "FSU has this park, so FAMU needs one too." Not in those exact words.
Good news is the County has announced it plans some sweeping changes for the park, which includes beefing up the marketing. There should be an article in tomorrow's paper about it.
#58
Posted 10 November 2005 - 11:11 AM
And its nto like we will be getting better air service anytime soon, all companies moniter markets constantly and choose to enter if they find it profitbale..... so another discount airline would have filled the void left by airtran if they thought they would make it already....
#59
Posted 10 November 2005 - 06:35 PM
Edited by csmurphy8885, 10 November 2005 - 06:35 PM.
#60
Posted 10 November 2005 - 08:12 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













