Jump to content


- - - - -

I-540 Exit Delays in Northwest Arkansas


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
30 replies to this topic

#1 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 29 July 2005 - 03:42 PM

Parsons Transportation Group recently released the results of a study done on 19 exits on I-540 in northwest Arkansas.  Here are the top six exits with delays.

Exit 86, Arkansas 102/Hwy 62, Bentonville
Exit 62, Hwy 62, Fayetteville
Exit 72, Hwy 412, Springdale
Exit 64, Hwy 16, Fayetteville
Exit 85, Hwy 71 Business, Rogers
Exit 88, Hwy 72, Bentonville

Unfortunately I couldn't find any numbers with each exit, but they are ranked with the top having the most delays.  

If anyone has noticed, instead of lumping everything under the Fayetteville topic I've decided to break these into seperate topics to make it easier to see and find.

Edited by Mith242, 29 July 2005 - 03:45 PM.


 

#2 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:19 PM

View PostMith242, on Jul 29 2005, 04:42 PM, said:

Parsons Transportation Group recently released the results of a study done on 19 exits on I-540 in northwest Arkansas.  Here are the top six exits with delays.

Exit 86, Arkansas 102/Hwy 62, Bentonville
Exit 62, Hwy 62, Fayetteville
Exit 72, Hwy 412, Springdale
Exit 64, Hwy 16, Fayetteville
Exit 85, Hwy 71 Business, Rogers
Exit 88, Hwy 72, Bentonville

Unfortunately I couldn't find any numbers with each exit, but they are ranked with the top having the most delays.  

If anyone has noticed, instead of lumping everything under the Fayetteville topic I've decided to break these into seperate topics to make it easier to see and find.
Yeah, 102 is bad, especially around rush-hours.

#3 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:22 PM

I wonder if those places will change once the new Perry Road Interchange is completed.

Part of Perry Road leading off the new interchange is supposed to have 9 lanes !!!! [b] They said that the intersection with the 9-lane Perry Road, and Future Hospital Boulevard aorund (5 or 6 lanes) is supposed to be the largest intersection in the State of Arkansas!!!

What's the biggest road in Little Rock in terms of lanes, because I don't think I have ever even heard of a road in Arkansas having 7 lanes.

Edited by mcheiss, 30 September 2005 - 12:23 PM.


#4 Aporkalypse

Aporkalypse

    City

  • Members+
  • 5,288 posts

Posted 06 October 2005 - 10:50 PM

View Postmcheiss, on Sep 30 2005, 01:22 PM, said:

I wonder if those places will change once the new Perry Road Interchange is completed.

Part of Perry Road leading off the new interchange is supposed to have 9 lanes !!!! [b] They said that the intersection with the 9-lane Perry Road, and Future Hospital Boulevard aorund (5 or 6 lanes) is supposed to be the largest intersection in the State of Arkansas!!!

What's the biggest road in Little Rock in terms of lanes, because I don't think I have ever even heard of a road in Arkansas having 7 lanes.

None do, University is supposed to be widened to this.  Poor city planning led to roads too narrow to widen to 6 or more lanes in LR.

#5 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 07 October 2005 - 12:41 PM

The city of Rogers, just expressed interest in wanting to widen the Pleasant Grove overpass to up to 8 Lanes!!! Want, no, more like needs. The city says that this next to the Perry Road Interchange is the most important road project in the city.

With the Wal-Mart Supercenter up an running along the street, and Arvest Bank, other projects expected to be put along the road in the next 2 or so years are

1) A 1.2 million square foot mall with power center and lifestyle center called Pleasant Crossing.
2) 130 acre mixed used development called the Grove including retail, condos, restaurant space, planned units
3) Tuscany Square development including a Sports Clips and Starbucks
4) Center Pointe mixed used development with Walgreens, condos, retail, restaurant around 50 or so acres
5) 150 acre sister project to Pleasant Crossing

I can't even imagine what Pleasant Grove Road is going to look like in 5 or so years. Right now, it's nothing but grass and farmland, but it will soon be an office, retail, and restaurant mecca. Also, all of these developers are working together by making a lot of the buildings brownish and white.

It's a great day to live in Northwest Arkansas!!!

#6 Aporkalypse

Aporkalypse

    City

  • Members+
  • 5,288 posts

Posted 07 October 2005 - 03:22 PM

8-9 lanes don't work well, too many cars get trapped and can't get over to turn left or right.  Even in Dallas you don't see arterials build larger than 7 lanes because of this.  I live near a large arterial, Northwest Highway, which probably carries as much traffic as I-540 does through NWA and it is only 6 lanes.

#7 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 07 October 2005 - 09:30 PM

But it's not only being used as a road for development. It also is serving as a connector road between I-540 and US-71B. With completion, double and triple turn lanes will be put in place around intersections on Pleasant Grove Road. I do agree that 8 lanes is a little large and is somewhat intemidating. But if double and triple turn lanes are in place, i do believe that it will be functional.

#8 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 10 October 2005 - 01:45 PM

It will be interesting to see.  I don't believe there is anything else that big in Arkansas.  Although I do wonder if Aporkalypse is right and that making it that big will cause problems with people trying to quickly get over into other lanes.  Hopefully they'll try to plan it out better than what it sounds like it might be.  But yes it is very odd to hear about the developments and they are still just fields now.  Northwest Arkansas and Rogers in particular will look very different 10 years from now.

#9 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 11 October 2005 - 12:49 PM

View PostMith242, on Oct 10 2005, 02:45 PM, said:

It will be interesting to see.  I don't believe there is anything else that big in Arkansas.  Although I do wonder if Aporkalypse is right and that making it that big will cause problems with people trying to quickly get over into other lanes.  Hopefully they'll try to plan it out better than what it sounds like it might be.  But yes it is very odd to hear about the developments and they are still just fields now.  Northwest Arkansas and Rogers in particular will look very different 10 years from now.
What do you see being the dominant factor in each city in Northwest Arkansas in the Future?

In terms of:
retail, restaurants, malls
"Downtown Urban feel"
Housing and Population numbers
Infastructure
Tourism
Manufacturing Blue Collar Crowd

#10 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 11 October 2005 - 03:28 PM

View Postmcheiss, on Oct 11 2005, 01:49 PM, said:

What do you see being the dominant factor in each city in Northwest Arkansas in the Future?

In terms of:
retail, restaurants, malls
"Downtown Urban feel"
Housing and Population numbers
Infastructure
Tourism
Manufacturing Blue Collar Crowd
Hmmm...interesting question.  I can see Fayetteville going more to tourism.  I'm surprised that northwest Arkansas hasn't gone after tourism a little more than they have.  It's a nice area of the state and we're also next door to many of the nicer areas of the Ozarks.  Springdale obviously has the blue collar crowd down.  But I think Springdale needs to try to be more than just this.  Or people will simply just think of it as a bedroom community and such.  I know some people have tried revamping their downtown area and nothing seems to have worked so far.  I think they will need to further improve their image and control their growth and development better than what they have done.  I think Rogers will have the best chance at trying for a urban feel.  Fayetteville may be bigger but I'm not sure if many people in Fayetteville want the city to go in that direction.  Obviously most of the growth is now taking place in Benton County and it has passed up Washington County in population not too long ago.  Although Fayetteville and Springdale still remain the two largest cities.  But Benton County has better land for development.  Infrastructure I think will continue to cause problems for all of northwest Arkansas for years to come.

#11 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 11 October 2005 - 08:43 PM

View PostMith242, on Oct 11 2005, 04:28 PM, said:

Hmmm...interesting question.  I can see Fayetteville going more to tourism.  I'm surprised that northwest Arkansas hasn't gone after tourism a little more than they have.  It's a nice area of the state and we're also next door to many of the nicer areas of the Ozarks.  Springdale obviously has the blue collar crowd down.  But I think Springdale needs to try to be more than just this.  Or people will simply just think of it as a bedroom community and such.  I know some people have tried revamping their downtown area and nothing seems to have worked so far.  I think they will need to further improve their image and control their growth and development better than what they have done.  I think Rogers will have the best chance at trying for a urban feel.  Fayetteville may be bigger but I'm not sure if many people in Fayetteville want the city to go in that direction.  Obviously most of the growth is now taking place in Benton County and it has passed up Washington County in population not too long ago.  Although Fayetteville and Springdale still remain the two largest cities.  But Benton County has better land for development.  Infrastructure I think will continue to cause problems for all of northwest Arkansas for years to come.
Interesting.

I do agree with you on your comments about Fayetteville going more Tourism. Lovely and beautiful city, I thik that Fayetteville could go for a more urban feel. The Mountain Inn Projects, and all of those nice condo projects in your city could start a revelation.

Benton County does have good land for development. The problem is coordination between developers. As I have stated, some of these developers don't care about the future urban feel of Northwest Arkansas. They want their project to stand out and look better than all the other ones. I'm hoping more progress is takin in zoning problems.

I really have started to see a very small urban core begin to form in Rogers just off exit 85 (A.K.A. Pinnacle Hills). There's quite a few large buildings going up right now. Since I last drove by there, two 3-story buildings have began construction with steel work going on. Pinnacle has stated that this area is going to be the premier address for Northwest Arkansas. I hope they go with that attitude. Around that area I have seen land, especially around the future 9-story Mercy Health Hospital along Hospital Boulevard that would go perfect for Highway Commercial Zoning and Higher.

As with Springdale, they are growing at an alarming rate, yet all they have is chicken plants and residential office. In my opinion, residential office will be the death of Tall skyscrappers in the area. They seem to flood the area in each city. I can see Springdale continuing wiht large population growth, and hopefully the proposed minor league baseball stadium can get going with the arena, which will boost tourism and retail figures there. If that is built, I can see Springdale gaining more retail projects, yet still laging behind Rogers and Fayetteville.

#12 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 04:46 AM

View Postmcheiss, on Oct 11 2005, 09:43 PM, said:

Interesting.

I do agree with you on your comments about Fayetteville going more Tourism. Lovely and beautiful city, I thik that Fayetteville could go for a more urban feel. The Mountain Inn Projects, and all of those nice condo projects in your city could start a revelation.

Benton County does have good land for development. The problem is coordination between developers. As I have stated, some of these developers don't care about the future urban feel of Northwest Arkansas. They want their project to stand out and look better than all the other ones. I'm hoping more progress is takin in zoning problems.

I really have started to see a very small urban core begin to form in Rogers just off exit 85 (A.K.A. Pinnacle Hills). There's quite a few large buildings going up right now. Since I last drove by there, two 3-story buildings have began construction with steel work going on. Pinnacle has stated that this area is going to be the premier address for Northwest Arkansas. I hope they go with that attitude. Around that area I have seen land, especially around the future 9-story Mercy Health Hospital along Hospital Boulevard that would go perfect for Highway Commercial Zoning and Higher.

As with Springdale, they are growing at an alarming rate, yet all they have is chicken plants and residential office. In my opinion, residential office will be the death of Tall skyscrappers in the area. They seem to flood the area in each city. I can see Springdale continuing wiht large population growth, and hopefully the proposed minor league baseball stadium can get going with the arena, which will boost tourism and retail figures there. If that is built, I can see Springdale gaining more retail projects, yet still laging behind Rogers and Fayetteville.
I also agree.  I do hope the sports complex in Springdale goes forward.  We already have the Razorbacks here in Fayetteville and Springdale could use something to help give the city some identity.  Aporkalypse has pointed out Springdale's problem with zoning before.  I do believe this has hurt Springdale quite a bit.  I do think some denser more urban areas will occur but I don't necessarily think it will happen overnight.  I guess it's more of a question of when it will happen.  I also imagine not having one single urban core will also slow the process down.  Northwest Arkansas is and will be a great place, but it's just not going to have a skyline like Little Rock.  Except for in a distant future perhaps.

#13 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 06:21 AM

View PostMith242, on Oct 12 2005, 05:46 AM, said:

I also agree.  I do hope the sports complex in Springdale goes forward.  We already have the Razorbacks here in Fayetteville and Springdale could use something to help give the city some identity.  Aporkalypse has pointed out Springdale's problem with zoning before.  I do believe this has hurt Springdale quite a bit.  I do think some denser more urban areas will occur but I don't necessarily think it will happen overnight.  I guess it's more of a question of when it will happen.  I also imagine not having one single urban core will also slow the process down.  Northwest Arkansas is and will be a great place, but it's just not going to have a skyline like Little Rock.  Except for in a distant future perhaps.
We all probably won't have a single urban core,but that doesn't mean that 2 urban cores (smaller) are bad. If populations continue to grow, who knows that one of those urban cores in the area will pass up Little Rock. I think that if the land is available, developers will work more together in the future and metro's will begin to form.

#14 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 01:51 PM

View Postmcheiss, on Oct 12 2005, 07:21 AM, said:

We all probably won't have a single urban core,but that doesn't mean that 2 urban cores (smaller) are bad. If populations continue to grow, who knows that one of those urban cores in the area will pass up Little Rock. I think that if the land is available, developers will work more together in the future and metro's will begin to form.
Maybe it's a possibility far down the road.  But I don't see an urban core developing up here that could challenge Little Rock for a long time.  Who knows you could even end up with the possibility of a merger between Little Rock and North Little Rock.  Which could even help focus more attention on their urban core.

#15 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 01:54 PM

View PostMith242, on Oct 12 2005, 02:51 PM, said:

Maybe it's a possibility far down the road.  But I don't see an urban core developing up here that could challenge Little Rock for a long time.  Who knows you could even end up with the possibility of a merger between Little Rock and North Little Rock.  Which could even help focus more attention on their urban core.
I think Little Rock and North Little Rock are focusing more on their urban core as a whole. Look at all the condo projects in the Little Rock forum and you'll see all of these projects going along the Arkansas River in both Little Rock and North Little Rock.

#16 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 02:11 PM

View Postmcheiss, on Oct 12 2005, 02:54 PM, said:

I think Little Rock and North Little Rock are focusing more on their urban core as a whole. Look at all the condo projects in the Little Rock forum and you'll see all of these projects going along the Arkansas River in both Little Rock and North Little Rock.
Yes they do seem to be doing a good job working together in some aspects even though there isn't much talk of merging the two cities.  I think northwest Arkansas could learn a lesson from them.  But I guess it is more complicated up here.  You have four cities instead of just two and you also have two counties involved and not just one.

#17 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 02:14 PM

View PostMith242, on Oct 12 2005, 03:11 PM, said:

Yes they do seem to be doing a good job working together in some aspects even though there isn't much talk of merging the two cities.  I think northwest Arkansas could learn a lesson from them.  But I guess it is more complicated up here.  You have four cities instead of just two and you also have two counties involved and not just one.
And you also have cities like Cave Springs, Elm Springs, Farmington, Elkins, Centerton, Springtown, Bethel Heights, Johnson, Little Flock, Lowell, and Centerton.

#18 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 02:28 PM

View Postmcheiss, on Oct 12 2005, 03:14 PM, said:

And you also have cities like Cave Springs, Elm Springs, Farmington, Elkins, Centerton, Springtown, Bethel Heights, Johnson, Little Flock, Lowell, and Centerton.
Perhaps that's another possibility.  Having smaller towns merge with some of the main cities up here.  Not that it would have as big of an impact as merging two of the main cities up here.  But could help centralize things up here in the future.

Edited by Mith242, 12 October 2005 - 02:28 PM.


#19 mcheiss

mcheiss

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,595 posts

Posted 13 October 2005 - 12:32 PM

View PostMith242, on Oct 12 2005, 03:28 PM, said:

Perhaps that's another possibility.  Having smaller towns merge with some of the main cities up here.  Not that it would have as big of an impact as merging two of the main cities up here.  But could help centralize things up here in the future.
That's true, because a lot of these smaller cities can't afford to pay for infastructure and projects. If they did merge with larger cities, than that land could become developed and more centralized.

Some small cities will take almost anything that comes to them (retail, restaurants, etc), so if they merge with a larger city, than zoning issues could be solved.

#20 Mith242

Mith242

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 18,473 posts

Posted 13 October 2005 - 02:35 PM

View Postmcheiss, on Oct 13 2005, 01:32 PM, said:

That's true, because a lot of these smaller cities can't afford to pay for infastructure and projects. If they did merge with larger cities, than that land could become developed and more centralized.

Some small cities will take almost anything that comes to them (retail, restaurants, etc), so if they merge with a larger city, than zoning issues could be solved.
It would certainly help, but I'm not sure how big of an effect it would have on the whole region.  Obviously having a bigger merger with say two of the main cities would have a bigger effect and would help unify the area.