John Marshall Hotel
#21
Posted 31 January 2006 - 11:52 AM
#22
Posted 31 January 2006 - 11:58 AM
wrldcoupe4, on Jan 31 2006, 12:52 PM, said:
Hmmmm. Well, if he could afford to buy the building, he can't be totally worthless. Let's keep our extremities crossed.
#23
Posted 01 February 2006 - 11:55 PM
#24
Posted 02 February 2006 - 12:39 AM
#25
Posted 02 February 2006 - 09:11 AM
#26
Posted 02 March 2006 - 06:37 PM
Downtowner, on Feb 2 2006, 10:11 AM, said:
Hey all I'm new here. Who is jemel you guys are talking of ?
I am a banquet operator here in the city, and fawning over the thought of their Ballrooms being in use again
First, welcome to the forum. Personal website was deleted per forum rules. Please see rules for more info.
Also can I het the forums to start at the last entry and go back ????
Thanks all Rock on Richmond !!
You can go to the first and last entry very easily. On the left hand side of every thread you will see a box and there you can jump to the first or last page and every page inbetween.
Umm sorry if I offended someone. I saw that our Venue had been listed in the forums and was simply showing the website and mail address for our building in Richmond. I didn't post it for profit or personal gain other than I am a very proud Richmonder who is like most a working hard to make Richmond better. I only did it cause I was sure that I had seen some other posts that had thier sites or at least references to sites in the Richmond area
Our Building has been in Richmond since 1894 and surely was a valuable asset to the city, my references to ours versus the John Marshall was sinply due to the Styles of the Ballrooms being in the same genre
Sorry again
Edited by jonbeattie, 03 March 2006 - 08:55 PM.
#27
Posted 02 March 2006 - 10:35 PM
Jamal was part of a conglomerate that recently purchased James Center and he has other properties scattered around downtown.
Edited by burt, 03 March 2006 - 09:38 AM.
#28
Posted 03 March 2006 - 02:13 PM
The developer of the John Marshall "couldn't make it" to the meeting. However, he did say to tell the audience that plans are still moving forward, just slower than he expected. He said work should/will begin in 2006.
#29
Posted 03 March 2006 - 02:25 PM
Hopefully it will get actually get going if the developer was leaving statements for the crowd yesterday.
#30
Posted 24 April 2006 - 01:08 PM
#31
Posted 24 April 2006 - 03:09 PM
#32
Posted 26 April 2006 - 08:51 AM
#34
Posted 26 April 2006 - 05:47 PM
Imagine its sign lit behind the Berry Burk sign.
#35
Posted 26 April 2006 - 08:13 PM
#36
Posted 26 April 2006 - 08:16 PM
#38
Posted 26 April 2006 - 08:20 PM
#39
Posted 01 May 2006 - 08:29 PM
wrldcoupe4, on Apr 26 2006, 10:20 PM, said:
I went by there to see what was happening after work Sunday Early am. There were 2 large semi traliers with what looked like massive hoses on the them aand waht looked like an air handler, just very large. As old as it is I would supose asbestos is in there and perhaps the slow down but just guessing. Anyhoo I'm glad to see them working on the old girl......
OHHHHH and wow the Berry Burk sign is so great to see again, I can't wait to see the Marshal sign !!!!!
#40
Posted 02 May 2006 - 10:16 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













