Easley-Powdersville Developments
#41
Posted 23 May 2006 - 07:17 AM
The Greenville News (SC)
2006/5/22
Construction on Powdersville's new library will begin approximately within a week. The building, which will also include some county offices, will be built along SC-81 adjacent to the Powdersville Water System office.
#42
Posted 30 May 2006 - 12:59 PM
More info: http://greenvilleonl...INESS/605300344
Edited by g-man430, 30 May 2006 - 01:00 PM.
#43
Posted 30 May 2006 - 06:16 PM
Locating at the fomer Saco Lowell site in a concern with the railroad beside US-123 and the haphazard crossing and Prince Perry overpass. If it goes up across the street, it would be an ideal site. Perhaps Rock Springs Road can be rerouted around the church property so it would not interfere with church traffic.
what would become of the current Wal-mart on South Pendleton Street if it does relocate? Something like Kohl's or Target will have no trouble going in.
#44
Posted 16 June 2006 - 09:55 PM
The Greenville News (SC)
2006-6-16
Instead of placing time limits on parking spaces, why not invest money into a parking deck to serve the downtown area?
#45
Posted 17 June 2006 - 04:58 PM
#46
Posted 23 June 2006 - 07:19 AM
The Greenville News (SC)
2006-6-23
With the parking ordinance now in effect, it will be interesting to see what becomes of Easley High School's parking situation. Being a hugely populated school and more students parking, parking spaces become limited. Instead of paying a fee and driving around the lot looking for a space, the student body parks two blocks away at Olde Market Square taking up spaces for local shops. The solution may be limiting parking to the high school and selling permits on a first come, first serve basis.
Mroe streetside parking would be useful. If eastbound SC-93 traffic can be diverted onto First Avenue, some diagonal parking would do well along a westbound traffic Main Street.
#47
Posted 07 July 2006 - 07:56 PM
#48
Posted 07 July 2006 - 08:36 PM
#49
Posted 07 July 2006 - 10:07 PM
BoDragon, on Jul 7 2006, 10:36 PM, said:
Don't forget that there is a fairly new Publix in Easley (built within the last couple of years), just a few miles down US 123. There is also a Home Depot there. I doubt Publix would put a second location at this new retail development, but maybe they feel that the two stores would draw from different areas of town.
I also recall that Easley currently has a Wal-Mart 4-5 miles down the road just off of US 123. If they build a SuperCenter closer to this new development, will the current location close? Has anyone heard anything about this?
Edited by Greenville, 07 July 2006 - 10:09 PM.
#50
Posted 08 July 2006 - 09:02 PM
It is usually typical for Walmart to close existing stores when they are replaced by a supercenter. When Walmart opens its Easley supercenter, the South Pendleton Street location will likely close.
#51
Posted 09 July 2006 - 11:04 AM
Also, I thought that the intersection required to access Saco Lowell Rd (Prince Perry Rd)required raising 123 up so that the bridge won't have to have that arch in it? Or does he mean a new bridge altogether?
#52
Posted 09 July 2006 - 03:44 PM
Spartan, on Jul 9 2006, 01:04 PM, said:
Also, I thought that the intersection required to access Saco Lowell Rd (Prince Perry Rd)required raising 123 up so that the bridge won't have to have that arch in it? Or does he mean a new bridge altogether?
#53
Posted 09 July 2006 - 09:04 PM
Spartan, on Jul 9 2006, 01:04 PM, said:
Easley is large enough to support 3 Bi-Los and 2 Ingle's.
Spartan, on Jul 9 2006, 01:04 PM, said:
It will be a new bridge altogether. The arch bridge is not a good place to be when you're in a line of traffic waiting for the signal to turn green. Raising US-123 would be extensive, but lowering the Norfolk Southern line a couple feet can be easily done.
#54
Posted 09 July 2006 - 09:11 PM
I think that lowering a railroad line would be just as difficult as raising the road.
#55
Posted 09 July 2006 - 09:14 PM
Spartan, on Jul 9 2006, 11:11 PM, said:
I think that lowering a railroad line would be just as difficult as raising the road.
#56
Posted 09 July 2006 - 09:26 PM
#57
Posted 09 July 2006 - 09:51 PM
Edited by BoDragon, 09 July 2006 - 09:51 PM.
#58
Posted 10 July 2006 - 10:06 AM
Edited by scman473, 10 July 2006 - 10:09 AM.
#59
Posted 10 July 2006 - 11:24 AM
scman473, on Jul 10 2006, 12:06 PM, said:
yes u r correct about the location of the church and the plant is just a stones thrown down and across hwy 123.
#60
Posted 10 July 2006 - 05:45 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













