IN PROGRESS: Front Street @ Adriaen's Landing
#1141
Posted 02 December 2011 - 01:03 PM
#1142
Posted 04 December 2011 - 10:05 AM
#1143
Posted 16 January 2012 - 05:29 PM
http://www.hartfordb.../news22160.html
#1144
Posted 17 January 2012 - 12:22 PM
#1145
Posted 19 January 2012 - 12:35 PM
http://www.courant.c...,0,790041.story
#1146
Posted 22 February 2012 - 02:45 PM
http://courantblogs....ne-youd-expect/
Edited by Theophrastus Bombastus, 23 February 2012 - 10:26 AM.
#1147
Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:16 PM
#1148
Posted 24 February 2012 - 01:51 PM
for my part, if the recent comments about the residential component are true, This project overall will start to show signs of hopo.
here is the breakdown...
IF they build 115 Apartments on the parking lot between the Hartford Times and The Elks Hall, Front Street would be much more tied-in to the city. The apartments would also add much needed life to this very "pretty" part of the city (the area in front ofg the Elks is my favorite part of the city, it just needs improvements to Travelers Plaza and Wadsworth so they interact with the street)
The apartment building would have 16,000SF of retail. these 16,000SF would surely be likely to attract tenents because of the apartments and (hopefully) theater and music venue.
If the movie theater, infinity Hall, the Apartment building and maybe a couple eateries move into the complex, I see the potential for a decent development at the Hartford times building. Again mixed use with apartments etc... If this were to happen I think it would just be a matter of time before the sliver of land next to the whitehead would be developed, and the striplall would therefore be redeveloped with a higher use.
no guarantees, but if in the end we get 115 apartments Near the Elks, and 100+ more at Hartford times, the overall project would not be an abject failure. especially if the entertainment district were to "stick"
I still hate it though!
#1149
Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:19 AM
#1150
Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:55 AM
I wanted to put this link here too because if we are getting 115 apartments above 16,000SF of retail, it would be pretty simular to the project in the link a 106 unit over 12,000SF
its in Minneapolis, where their apartment boom makes ours look pathetic.
http://m.startribune...d=140248383&c=y
Edited by The Voice of Reason, 25 February 2012 - 10:56 AM.
#1151
Posted 08 May 2012 - 10:51 AM
"EXIT 54 - Adrian's Landing District"
Yo, Adrian!!!!!
#1152
Posted 08 May 2012 - 12:16 PM
I write it wrong all the time, which is sad, but I dont make highway signs. why does this kind of thing always keep happening?
#1153
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:13 PM
http://www.facebook....223766820990888


#1154
Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:19 AM
Eventually Front Street will begin to fill up. It's just a question of time frame. Once again, housing would have made a huge difference. The theaters are a good start. In the original proposal there was a bar/restaurant included with the theaters operated by Spotlight.
Edited by beerbeer, 11 May 2012 - 05:20 AM.
#1155
Posted 12 May 2012 - 10:59 AM
Edited by MichaelQReilly, 12 May 2012 - 11:01 AM.
#1156
Posted 13 May 2012 - 09:31 AM
I have been to WH Center, Manchester, Plainville and New Park Ave in that time. Would much rather head to downtown!
Also, in a report on the old cceda from 2011 there is multiple mentions of phase 2 as residential and retail like Nitkin has said, but the fact that CCEDA was involved and aware makes me think this project is even more likely and maybe further along in planning than I thought
so, we shall see!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














