Jump to content


- - - - -

Asheville's Newest: The M Grande Resort and Spa


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
21 replies to this topic

#1 archiham04

archiham04

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 307 posts

Posted 27 September 2005 - 09:07 AM

http://www.themgrande.com/

This project will be in Western Buncombe County, just outside the Asheville City Limits.

 

#2 orulz

orulz

    Town

  • Moderators
  • 3,518 posts

Posted 27 September 2005 - 11:39 AM

First reaction: What the...?

For those of you wondering what the name "The M Grande" means, but don't want to click on the link, well... the building looks like a giant distorted "M".

Bold? yes. Strange? Absolutely. I dunno about this. Hopefully this place isn't visible from anywhere else so it won't really matter.

#3 Damien

Damien

    Swoon

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 27 September 2005 - 03:02 PM

I kinda like this. Its very 60's mod meets the future. Although i will say that it definitely wouldnt fit in downtown.

#4 DigitalSky

DigitalSky

    City

  • Members+
  • 6,308 posts

Posted 27 September 2005 - 08:27 PM

it looks kinda like a cruise ship

#5 GSP Tiger

GSP Tiger

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,525 posts

Posted 27 September 2005 - 10:13 PM

It looks sleek and modern.  I hope it does well.

#6 appatone

appatone

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 849 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 12:21 PM

It's interesting but I would hope it doesn't end up like that monstrosity on top of Beech Mountain.

#7 cinco

cinco

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,322 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 01:00 PM

if this is nestled in a valley it will be very cool. if it's on a mountain top...then i would give it th nay-no. it is a fun design, i can't wait to load up the space pod and beam over to the m grande.

#8 cinco

cinco

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,322 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 01:06 PM

^from what i just gathered from the website - it will be located in the french broad valley. also, if you click on gallery then vistas...it alludes that it will be on a mountain face in a valley. nice.

Edited by cinco, 28 September 2005 - 01:07 PM.


#9 archiham04

archiham04

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 307 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 01:22 PM

View Postcinco, on Sep 28 2005, 01:00 PM, said:

if this is nestled in a valley it will be very cool. if it's on a mountain top...then i would give it th nay-no. it is a fun design, i can't wait to load up the space pod and beam over to the m grande.

I don't know a lot of details, but I hear it will be elevated... "on a saddle" is how it was described.  NC ridgetop laws will probably prohibit it from imposing on the ridgeline like the one on Sugar.

By the way, this project is FOR REAL.  The developer has hired a contractor and is negotiating with local design firms.  "...meet George Jetson..." :whistling:

#10 orulz

orulz

    Town

  • Moderators
  • 3,518 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 03:32 PM

To the best of my knowledge, ridgetop laws only apply above 4500 feet. Below that, anything's game.

This is being built by a Myrtle Beach company. According to this article it will be on a mountain. Words cannot describe how out of place this will look on top of a mountain for all to see. Unlike Myrtle Beach, Asheville is not (and never has been) about showy vegas strip-sytle glitz. Asheville is about classiness and nature. Put this resort in a valley or an unobtrusive hillside and I have no problem with it; the design is strange but it is kind of fun. It sort of seems to evoke mountains.

But then, stick it on top of a mountain- and it will ruin the view for miles around, as if to say "Screw you nature, screw you locals, I don't give a crap about you because I'm better than you!" And it looks like that's what is going to happen.

Thank you, Buncombe county, for your refusal to regulate land use!

#11 urbanesq

urbanesq

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 589 posts

Posted 01 October 2005 - 07:48 AM

looks like something out of a 1980's sci-fi film.  Very Buck Rogers.
I'm all for mod, but this looks kinda stupid.  Also looks like the kind of place that will seem outdated and shabby VERY soon.

I can already imagine the editorials in a decade or two calling for the destruction of the eyesore.

#12 DanRNC

DanRNC

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,927 posts

Posted 01 October 2005 - 01:23 PM

Quote

looks like something out of a 1980's sci-fi film. Very Buck Rogers.
I'm all for mod, but this looks kinda stupid. Also looks like the kind of place that will seem outdated and shabby VERY soon.

I can already imagine the editorials in a decade or two calling for the destruction of the eyesore.

I agree totally. It looks completely out of place in that area of the state.

#13 Dukeis#1

Dukeis#1

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 62 posts

Posted 01 October 2005 - 05:22 PM

I kind of like the design of the building.  Just hope it doesn't ruin the moutain setting.

However, I think it would be nice if the people behind this would have came up with a design that fits in a little more.  Echoing the above comments, this seems like something that belongs in some beachside resort town rather than the mountains...


"M" Grande Resort and Spa?  I'm sick of all these new age-ish names! :angry: :D

Edited by Dukeis#1, 01 October 2005 - 05:23 PM.


#14 NCMike1981

NCMike1981

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,045 posts

Posted 01 October 2005 - 10:54 PM

it's so....modern....looks like something that belongs in RTP not on 400 acres in the mountains

#15 Hankster

Hankster

    Town

  • Members+
  • 3,309 posts

Posted 06 October 2005 - 07:51 PM

View PostNCMike1981, on Oct 2 2005, 12:54 AM, said:

it's so....modern....looks like something that belongs in RTP not on 400 acres in the mountains

I like it.  Asheville is so beautiful, and such a neat city that I often wondered when another mega hotel would be built there.  If they do build this thing, I predict that it will be very successful.

#16 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts

Posted 20 October 2005 - 10:49 PM

Watch out Grove Park? I think what makes the Grove Park Inn so successful is that it conforms ot everythign that has been described before: archtecture, nature, etc.

This M Grande thing is quite hideous. The sad thing is that many tourists probably won't care, just so long as its a hotel that they can use.

#17 rooster8

rooster8

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 640 posts

Posted 21 October 2005 - 10:03 AM

That is probably the worst looking design I've ever seen.

#18 Hankster

Hankster

    Town

  • Members+
  • 3,309 posts

Posted 27 October 2005 - 06:38 PM

View Postrooster8, on Oct 21 2005, 12:03 PM, said:

That is probably the worst looking design I've ever seen.

It's the kind of design people will either love or hate.  I think once it's built, it will grow on people and become quite the landmark.

#19 MR-2

MR-2

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 659 posts

Posted 29 October 2005 - 02:24 PM

As long as it isn't visibly detracting from the mountain scenery, I'm fine with it. I quite like the design actually, just not in the context of the mountains.

#20 Dylan

Dylan

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 146 posts

Posted 08 November 2005 - 11:33 AM

It's neat looking for sure. I dont think it will do any damage to the Grove Park's sucess  though. Nothing would replace that classic hotel/resort.