Jump to content


- - - - -

GM Lansing Car Assembly Plant


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
14 replies to this topic

Poll: GM Lansing Car Assembly Plant (14 member(s) have cast votes)

What should replace it?

  1. Owner Occupied Homes (3 votes [21.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

  2. Condominium Development (2 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  3. Office Park (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  4. Theme Park / Go Cart Track (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  5. Neighborhood Similar to East Village (4 votes [28.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

  6. Other (3 votes [21.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 jaredw

jaredw

    Whistle-Stop

  • MemberZ
  • PipPipPip
  • 207 posts

Posted 13 October 2005 - 10:36 AM

What do you think should be built in place of the Lansing Car Assembly plant?

Lansing Car Assembly is split into two sites: A 74-acre parcel of land off Verlinden Avenue and a 188-acre plot off Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.

 

#2 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 13 October 2005 - 01:01 PM

I think both parcels whould be mixed-use.  That is a must, in my book.  But, the scale should be different.

The MLK site is just ripe for potential high-rise/mid-rise residential, with plenty of shopping, perhaps even a small Eastwood-type mall, but much more urban, and PLENTY of entertainment options.  The riverfront should include a promenade.  Since this is right off the high-way, this could in fact be a southern extension of downtown, something I never thought I'd see in my lifetime.

The Verliden site should be on a much smaller scale, and be dedicated to smaller businesses and neighborhood shops, with plent of affordable single-family housing to fit into the current neighborhood.  I also like Virg Bernero's idea of using part of the site for market-rate, but senior-citizens, housing.  But, housing is key.  This area needs to feed the schools in the area, perhaps offsetting the loss the district has seen in students.  Lansing needs to be made attractive to many more families again.

I can't believe how big this is going to be.  I never put much thought into it before, but such large parcels just opening up could mean HUGE things for Lansing's future.  This is bigger than anything that could happen downtown.

BTW, if anyone wants to send the planning department ideas, just write the head of planning, Jim Ruff at jruff@ci.lansing.mi.us

#3 patrickom

patrickom

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 13 October 2005 - 01:22 PM

I agree with your assessment. So I take it from what you've said that you are using "East Village" in the sense of the planned EL development, not the smaller, currently-building Lansing neighborhood?

What might be some similarities or differences between that development area and this one? Thoughts?

#4 jaredw

jaredw

    Whistle-Stop

  • MemberZ
  • PipPipPip
  • 207 posts

Posted 13 October 2005 - 01:38 PM

Yes, that is what I was thinking, because this is right on the river just like the East Lansing East Village developments.

Similar to this:  Posted Image

#5 statedude3

statedude3

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 828 posts

Posted 13 October 2005 - 03:18 PM

View Postjaredw, on Oct 13 2005, 03:38 PM, said:

Yes, that is what I was thinking, because this is right on the river just like the East Lansing East Village developments.

Similar to this:  Posted Image

If an area like this was ever built, I would plant myself in Lansing and never look back.  This is the EXACT sort of opportunity that Lansing needs to bring people back.  I just hope that it does not sit around for months or years waiting for something to happen.  I've seen all too often in Michigan's Big 3 cities plans that work well, but never end up happening because of politics.

#6 davidb

davidb

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 20 October 2005 - 03:26 PM

View Poststatedude3, on Oct 13 2005, 05:18 PM, said:

This is the EXACT sort of opportunity that Lansing needs to bring people back.

I agree.

I would like to see something like West Village in Lansing, but within that entire area.  Make it green and walkable and put in good recreational amentities.  Also, I love the East Village idea of having a dock and more river orientation.  When the Great Lakes are cleaned up, the watersheds will get cleaned up, that is, over time.  When they take out the dam by the Brenke fish ladder, it is believed that alone will oxygenate the water and replace some of the bottomfeeders.

One thing I always like to see is more roof usage.  Why do so few buildings, particularly residential ones, restrict the roof so much?  I have seen some nice ideas such as gardens, bars, screened fences, etc., some in Lansing.

#7 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 20 October 2005 - 09:37 PM

The Brenke Fish Ladder and dam demoltion has been put on hold, and likely won't happen.  They aren't even considering testing rising and lowering water until next year.  I hope they don't tear it down.  It would lower the river through downtown by something like 6' messing up everything already built up to the river.

#8 davidb

davidb

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 21 October 2005 - 12:49 PM

View PostLmichigan, on Oct 20 2005, 11:37 PM, said:

It would lower the river through downtown by something like 6' messing up everything already built up to the river.

Would there be too much erosion? What would be sacrificed?  If it will make the water look healthy and not smell so bad, I am for it.

#9 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 21 October 2005 - 12:58 PM

Do you realize how much is built right on the river?  Imagine the effect on the Riverfront promenade behind the Lansing Center.  Imagine the boat launches at Riverfront and Cherry Hill Park the same.  The river doesn't need to be any smaller, especially through downtown.

Also, I don't know what you mean by the Grand River smells.  If anything smells or is dirty it's the Red Cedar River.  This is far to drastic a change.  Maybe a good compromise would be to somehow lower the the dam just a little bit instead of entirely tearing it down.

#10 davidb

davidb

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 21 October 2005 - 01:15 PM

I run, walk, or bike on the river trail two to three times a week, and I always notice a smell.  My understanding has long been that due to low oxygen levels, select vegetation and wildlife can exist.

The effect to me still seems minimal.  If anything, it allows for expansion on the area behind the Lansing Center, and the boat launches can be replaced.  You are right though, raising and lowering will be the best test.

#11 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 28 October 2005 - 11:32 AM

I'm surprised so many voted for a neighborhood similar to East Village.  IMO, apart from the condos closer to Saginaw Street, the whole layout and design of the neighborhood is very suburban.  I really wouldn't want to see that.  They didn't even follow the street grid of the city making it feel very walled off with one two entrances/exists off of Saginaw.

I hope if a neighborhood is built, it will continue the street grid.  If you want a suburban neighborhood, move to the suburbs, don't try and recreate it in the city.  People move to the city because it offers and alternative to the suburbs, not because it tries to recreate them.

#12 jaredw

jaredw

    Whistle-Stop

  • MemberZ
  • PipPipPip
  • 207 posts

Posted 28 October 2005 - 12:36 PM

I meant the East Village in East Lansing, the one in the pictures, see the posts above.

#13 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 28 October 2005 - 02:49 PM

Oh, that is much more telling.  I still don't think of that area as East Village.  It will always be Cedar Village to me or the East End.

#14 AlaLan

AlaLan

    Crossroads

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 15 December 2005 - 02:04 PM

The only problem with the 'east village' concept is that the CN has both yards and their mainline between the site and the river.  Which really puts a hamper on connecting the development to the river.

And before someone says 'we can just move it...' tell me how your going to pay for building a new class A double line, and where your going to move it to.

Likely the best option is a mixed use development on part and a small buisness/light industrial area next to the Grand River Assembly plant.  

(One problem with most mixed use/mixed income developments is their tendency to ignore how to relate modern industry to their typical mixed of residential and commerical properties.)

#15 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 15 December 2005 - 06:59 PM

You have a point at this particular site, but the whole point of mixed use is to displace and move industry to more appropriate parts of the city in most cases, where most industry has already relocated, anyway.

BTW, I drove by Lansing Assembly tonight over the MLK bridge, and the thing looked down-right spooky.  I've always been so use to seeing it lit, and with all of the lights turned out, it was a ominous gateway into downtown.