GM Lansing Car Assembly Plant
#1
Posted 13 October 2005 - 10:36 AM
Lansing Car Assembly is split into two sites: A 74-acre parcel of land off Verlinden Avenue and a 188-acre plot off Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
#2
Posted 13 October 2005 - 01:01 PM
The MLK site is just ripe for potential high-rise/mid-rise residential, with plenty of shopping, perhaps even a small Eastwood-type mall, but much more urban, and PLENTY of entertainment options. The riverfront should include a promenade. Since this is right off the high-way, this could in fact be a southern extension of downtown, something I never thought I'd see in my lifetime.
The Verliden site should be on a much smaller scale, and be dedicated to smaller businesses and neighborhood shops, with plent of affordable single-family housing to fit into the current neighborhood. I also like Virg Bernero's idea of using part of the site for market-rate, but senior-citizens, housing. But, housing is key. This area needs to feed the schools in the area, perhaps offsetting the loss the district has seen in students. Lansing needs to be made attractive to many more families again.
I can't believe how big this is going to be. I never put much thought into it before, but such large parcels just opening up could mean HUGE things for Lansing's future. This is bigger than anything that could happen downtown.
BTW, if anyone wants to send the planning department ideas, just write the head of planning, Jim Ruff at jruff@ci.lansing.mi.us
#3
Posted 13 October 2005 - 01:22 PM
What might be some similarities or differences between that development area and this one? Thoughts?
#4
Posted 13 October 2005 - 01:38 PM
Similar to this:
#5
Posted 13 October 2005 - 03:18 PM
jaredw, on Oct 13 2005, 03:38 PM, said:
Similar to this:

If an area like this was ever built, I would plant myself in Lansing and never look back. This is the EXACT sort of opportunity that Lansing needs to bring people back. I just hope that it does not sit around for months or years waiting for something to happen. I've seen all too often in Michigan's Big 3 cities plans that work well, but never end up happening because of politics.
#6
Posted 20 October 2005 - 03:26 PM
statedude3, on Oct 13 2005, 05:18 PM, said:
I agree.
I would like to see something like West Village in Lansing, but within that entire area. Make it green and walkable and put in good recreational amentities. Also, I love the East Village idea of having a dock and more river orientation. When the Great Lakes are cleaned up, the watersheds will get cleaned up, that is, over time. When they take out the dam by the Brenke fish ladder, it is believed that alone will oxygenate the water and replace some of the bottomfeeders.
One thing I always like to see is more roof usage. Why do so few buildings, particularly residential ones, restrict the roof so much? I have seen some nice ideas such as gardens, bars, screened fences, etc., some in Lansing.
#7
Posted 20 October 2005 - 09:37 PM
#8
Posted 21 October 2005 - 12:49 PM
Lmichigan, on Oct 20 2005, 11:37 PM, said:
Would there be too much erosion? What would be sacrificed? If it will make the water look healthy and not smell so bad, I am for it.
#9
Posted 21 October 2005 - 12:58 PM
Also, I don't know what you mean by the Grand River smells. If anything smells or is dirty it's the Red Cedar River. This is far to drastic a change. Maybe a good compromise would be to somehow lower the the dam just a little bit instead of entirely tearing it down.
#10
Posted 21 October 2005 - 01:15 PM
The effect to me still seems minimal. If anything, it allows for expansion on the area behind the Lansing Center, and the boat launches can be replaced. You are right though, raising and lowering will be the best test.
#11
Posted 28 October 2005 - 11:32 AM
I hope if a neighborhood is built, it will continue the street grid. If you want a suburban neighborhood, move to the suburbs, don't try and recreate it in the city. People move to the city because it offers and alternative to the suburbs, not because it tries to recreate them.
#12
Posted 28 October 2005 - 12:36 PM
#13
Posted 28 October 2005 - 02:49 PM
#14
Posted 15 December 2005 - 02:04 PM
And before someone says 'we can just move it...' tell me how your going to pay for building a new class A double line, and where your going to move it to.
Likely the best option is a mixed use development on part and a small buisness/light industrial area next to the Grand River Assembly plant.
(One problem with most mixed use/mixed income developments is their tendency to ignore how to relate modern industry to their typical mixed of residential and commerical properties.)
#15
Posted 15 December 2005 - 06:59 PM
BTW, I drove by Lansing Assembly tonight over the MLK bridge, and the thing looked down-right spooky. I've always been so use to seeing it lit, and with all of the lights turned out, it was a ominous gateway into downtown.













