Greenville Drive Baseball
#1
Posted 27 October 2005 - 09:43 AM
I personally am not a a big fan of this name and I did not care for the new logo either. It is kind of bland.
#2
Posted 27 October 2005 - 09:56 AM
#3
Posted 27 October 2005 - 10:32 AM
gsupstate, on Oct 27 2005, 11:56 AM, said:
The G-Drive, I kinda like the sound of that!
#4
Posted 27 October 2005 - 04:52 PM
On a positive note, it is still not as stupid as Grrrowl.
#5
Posted 27 October 2005 - 08:07 PM
Greenville, on Oct 27 2005, 06:52 PM, said:
Well, if you change your mind and make it back up to Greenville from Charleston, there's going to be a temporary fan shop set up in the West End beginning this weekend and a permanent shop will be set up soon and then relocate to the ballpark once it opens in April.
According to the Greenville Journal, the team had picked the "Greenville Joes" and had spent considerable time and effort into designing a logo and marketing before Major League Baseball said, "no," due to Shoeless Joe Jackson's still being banned due to his alleged role in the 1919 Black Sox scandal.
Other names that were in the running until the very end were "Greenville Grits" and "Greenville Fireflies" from what's printed in the Journal, too.
#6
Posted 27 October 2005 - 10:17 PM
I like the idea of a permanent team shop being set up. That sounds like a cool idea.
"Joes" would have been interesting, no doubt. I wonder if fans would've been able to buy a "hot cup of joe" at the concession? Ha ha.
"Drive" is MUCH better than "Grits!" "Fireflies" would've been okay I guess. So now every time I think about how bland a name like "Drive" is, I will remind myself that it could be worse ("Grits").
#7
Posted 28 October 2005 - 12:45 AM
#8
Posted 28 October 2005 - 03:45 AM
Skyliner, on Oct 28 2005, 02:45 AM, said:
Great idea Skyliner, get people into town a few hours before the game, or stay overnight.
#9
Posted 28 October 2005 - 07:13 AM
#10
Posted 28 October 2005 - 11:06 AM
The "Joes" is equally bad. A Shoeless Joe tie-in is okay, but not as the mascot name. Fireflies is uninspired, but at least I can picture a decent logo/mascot.
I would have expected the Drive logo to have wheels or indication of forward motion.
Obviously these folks didn't make their money in Marketing. Nevertheless, it will be an awesome stadium in an awesome location and I wish them much success.
#11
Posted 28 October 2005 - 11:09 AM
vicupstate, on Oct 28 2005, 01:06 PM, said:
It's funny you say that ... according to what I've read, Erwin Penland is the one that helped come up with the new team name and they also designed the logo.
#12
Posted 28 October 2005 - 11:58 AM
#13
Posted 02 November 2005 - 10:22 PM
Skyliner, on Oct 28 2005, 12:58 PM, said:
But I'll still support them.
#14
Posted 03 November 2005 - 10:03 AM
Greenville, on Oct 27 2005, 05:52 PM, said:
On a positive note, it is still not as stupid as Grrrowl.
But on a more positive note, it is much better than the Grits and definatley the Fireflies (where did that come from?)!
#15
Posted 08 November 2005 - 01:09 PM
#16
Posted 08 November 2005 - 01:45 PM
Edited by Ness, 13 November 2005 - 12:09 AM.
#17
Posted 08 November 2005 - 03:01 PM
#18
Posted 08 November 2005 - 10:26 PM
wellington, on Nov 8 2005, 05:01 PM, said:
#19
Posted 09 November 2005 - 04:43 AM
#20
Posted 09 November 2005 - 06:07 AM
NYTransplant, on Nov 9 2005, 04:43 AM, said:
People who dislike the name are propbubly more apt to write in about it. Im sure at some point after enough negatives have been written that a few supporters of the name will start writing in to defend it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













