Jump to content


- - - - -

Worcester City Square


  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

#81 jeepcj85

jeepcj85

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 01 April 2009 - 12:51 PM

The lease ended up at 195000. From what I read, the deal is for building H, which is on the corner of Mercantile(new street) and Foster, approximately where the old Bijou Cinema and Applebees now stands.

 

#82 Lowerdeck

Lowerdeck

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts
  • Location:The Quiet Corner CT

Posted 01 April 2009 - 11:25 PM

At least soon there will finally be progress.  Something there has been long overdue.

#83 The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,965 posts
  • Location:Wethersfield, Hartford

Posted 02 April 2009 - 09:14 AM

So does this mean the whole project will get done or are they going to build just one building?

As a total project I think it will be a great success, but I worry about individual pieces not having the same effect.

Its a shame Hannover can not just move downtown and take up all the opffice space.

Edited by The Voice of Reason, 02 April 2009 - 09:24 AM.


#84 Lowerdeck

Lowerdeck

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts
  • Location:The Quiet Corner CT

Posted 02 April 2009 - 09:37 PM

I'm guessing since there's a major tenant in one of the buildings, part/all of the old Common Outlets mall will be torn down.

I'm hoping with the project getting under way and the economy improving, once they get the ball rolling more will come and follow.

#85 jeepcj85

jeepcj85

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 03 April 2009 - 01:50 AM

Its enough square footage to release public money for demolition and infrastructure, such as ne roads and utilities.

#86 Lowerdeck

Lowerdeck

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts
  • Location:The Quiet Corner CT

Posted 30 April 2009 - 11:01 PM

According to the T&G today (4-30), Front St.'s extension will be delayed three years as it's been pushed to part two of the project.

Meanwhile public money to demolish the mall won't happen until June, when the lease with Unum is officially signed.

Source: http://www.telegram..../NEWS/904300634

Slow and steady progress, better than nothing.

#87 The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,965 posts
  • Location:Wethersfield, Hartford

Posted 01 May 2009 - 09:18 AM

Be patient.  it is only a matter of time before some form of High speed rail is built as per Obamas plan.  As of now it would go through Worcester to Springfield.  This will certainly help springfield as one of the hubs, but the fact that it will connect Worcester and Boston means the commute between the two citys will make Worcester easier to get to from Boston than Framingham.  I think not only will the Worcester airport grow, but the office and housing markets will take off.

#88 Lowerdeck

Lowerdeck

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts
  • Location:The Quiet Corner CT

Posted 02 May 2009 - 10:12 AM

View PostThe Voice of Reason, on May 1 2009, 11:18 AM, said:

Be patient.  it is only a matter of time before some form of High speed rail is built as per Obamas plan.  As of now it would go through Worcester to Springfield.  This will certainly help springfield as one of the hubs, but the fact that it will connect Worcester and Boston means the commute between the two citys will make Worcester easier to get to from Boston than Framingham.  I think not only will the Worcester airport grow, but the office and housing markets will take off.

Yes, that'll be another great huge boost.

Looks like 10 years from now, Worcester's got great potential to retake the #2 city in New England spot.  Between a potential high speed connect to Boston (I can see it likely non-stop or one stop too) and downtown redevelopment with CitySquare and whatever else might pop up once the economy rolls again - really exciting times.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users