Columbia Place Mall
#41
Posted 08 December 2005 - 05:22 PM
#42
Posted 08 December 2005 - 10:46 PM
(hehe)
#46
Posted 09 December 2005 - 02:13 AM
waccamatt, on Dec 9 2005, 12:37 AM, said:
I know, I was joking
Temeteron, on Dec 9 2005, 01:40 AM, said:
haha
waccamatt, on Dec 9 2005, 02:14 AM, said:
I think he means no new department stores want to enter the market.
#47
Posted 09 December 2005 - 03:29 AM
#49
Posted 09 December 2005 - 08:01 AM
Just kidding. Unfortunately I think that the dominant chains in the Carolinas- Parisian (which I consider upscale, like Lord & Taylor), Belk, Dillard's, Macy's, JC Penney and Sears- are all we'll have for a while. Saks is in Charleston mainly because of upper-income tourists, and upscale department stores elsewhere- from Bonwit Teller to the Hilton Head Saks- have failed.
#50
Posted 09 December 2005 - 08:03 AM
csedwards72, on Dec 9 2005, 09:01 AM, said:
Just kidding. Unfortunately I think that the dominant chains in the Carolinas- Parisian (which I consider upscale, like Lord & Taylor), Belk, Dillard's, Macy's, JC Penney and Sears- are all we'll have for a while. Saks is in Charleston mainly because of upper-income tourists, and upscale department stores elsewhere- from Bonwit Teller to the Hilton Head Saks- have failed.
Parisian has yet to enter the North Carolina markets though...
#51
Posted 09 December 2005 - 09:16 AM
Edited by Temeteron, 09 December 2005 - 09:23 AM.
#52
Posted 09 December 2005 - 09:29 AM
Temeteron, on Dec 9 2005, 11:16 AM, said:
I always considered Parisian upscale because no junk is sold there. Any Belk's or Dillard's will have plenty of nice things there but will also have some $9.99 track suits. Parisian's high-end things aren't usually any fancier than at a nice Dillard's or Belk's but Parisian just doesn't have the cheap stuff.
That Richland Parisian needs some updating- when I first visited in '95 it was nice, but now it looks kind of ragged. I'm really surprised that the Columbiana one was the one that closed- thought it would have been Richland.
I'm also surprised that Parisian hasn't come to NC yet. Northlake Mall and SouthPark in Charlotte would be perfect for Parisian.
Edited by csedwards72, 09 December 2005 - 09:32 AM.
#53
Posted 09 December 2005 - 11:32 AM
What Columbia probably needs in Columbia Place is a store that caters to the demographic of that area. Something different like Hecht's or a similar dept. store would be a nice anchor for Columbia Place.
It seems that Columbia either doesn't have the demographic or our leaders just do not want upscale stores here.
I would like to see upscale chain stores come to Columbia (and eventually they will), but it wouldn't do me any good because I can't afford, nor am I willing to pay $300 for jeans (at least right now
#54
Posted 09 December 2005 - 11:39 AM
#55
Posted 09 December 2005 - 12:58 PM
#56
Posted 09 December 2005 - 01:04 PM
If you look at Saks Inc.'s annual reports, Parisian is described as a store aimed at upper-middle to upper-income residents of large markets. If Columbia meets that target, it should be able to get more good stores.
#57
Posted 09 December 2005 - 01:22 PM
Bonwitteller closed due to bankruptcy. Their prices were outrageous for our city.
When talking to Columbia Place management, I was told they are courting both Traditional anchors and specialty retailers to fill the JCPenney space. They are not yet sure what they want to put in there and are looking at the outlines of what different tenants could do with the former JC Penney space.
Malls are moving away from the traditional department store format to compete and remain viable against newer Lifestyle Center formats. If you think for a minute that Columbia Place would go under. Let me send you the link to their home office.
www.cblproperties "Take a new look at CBL"
#58
Posted 09 December 2005 - 02:34 PM
Most people want fair prices, and the big boxes are living up to that end of the bargain, but they also want the appaerance of customer service and a modiucum of style, which most big boxes don't offer. People as a whole really like the concept of a department store, but want to pay next to nothing to get it.
The disconnect comes when people vote with their pocketbooks rather than with their senses and the sales at Target et al keep going up, typically at the expense of department stores. It makes it very hard for an investor to put his money into department stores, and those companies try to save what they can by focusing on their most profitable stores.
What that means for midsized markets like Columbia, which has solid cores of loyal customers at stores with relatively low productivity is that they lose their stores with nothing to take their places, which in turn feeds into the big-boxes hands. Poeple will shop and need to shop, and presented with a somewhat viable option, will adjust and keep shopping.
If someone came up with a department store concept that embraced big-box style variety with more style, slightly higher prices and good service and focused on the neglected small to midsized markets in this country, they could make a fortune. Not only that, they'd have their pick of prime locations, because the big guys are throwing them away like old newspaper.
But I digress...
Edited by StevenRocks, 09 December 2005 - 11:23 PM.
#59
Posted 09 December 2005 - 04:27 PM
Edited by Temeteron, 09 December 2005 - 04:28 PM.
#60
Posted 09 December 2005 - 04:58 PM
I completely agree with those of you who have said that department stores are all the same. I see no major difference between them. They all have the same clothiers within generally. I find that Dillards has a better selection of quality ties, shirts, pants and such, but thats about it. I simply don't go to department stores for anything else. I'm a huge fan of Old Navy though. I never saw anything special about the Parisian at Colubiana.
Edited by Spartan, 09 December 2005 - 05:07 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













