Columbia Economic Notes
#81
Posted 06 November 2010 - 10:50 PM
#82
Posted 20 November 2010 - 02:06 PM
Although I know it's beyond his sphere of influence, I don't think one can talk about high(er) taxes in the city of Columbia in particular without taking into account how the state's restrictive annexation laws hamstring the city. Columbia may have a population of ~125K, but it has a tax base about the size of Rock Hill's, which is half its size. That's what having tons of tax-exempt properties (state offices, USC, Ft. Jackson, hospitals, etc.) within a city that can't reasonably expand its borders will do.
#83
Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:54 AM
http://www.usatoday....h-graphic_N.htm
#84
Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:51 AM
#85
Posted 10 January 2011 - 05:33 AM
#86
Posted 10 January 2011 - 08:54 AM
#87
Posted 10 January 2011 - 09:00 AM
#88
Posted 10 January 2011 - 09:42 AM
#89
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:05 AM
#90
Posted 22 February 2011 - 07:28 AM
krazeeboi, on 20 November 2010 - 02:06 PM, said:
Although I know it's beyond his sphere of influence, I don't think one can talk about high(er) taxes in the city of Columbia in particular without taking into account how the state's restrictive annexation laws hamstring the city. Columbia may have a population of ~125K, but it has a tax base about the size of Rock Hill's, which is half its size. That's what having tons of tax-exempt properties (state offices, USC, Ft. Jackson, hospitals, etc.) within a city that can't reasonably expand its borders will do.
Quote
It’s why big job announcements, like Boeing and Amazon.com, have not come their way.
Instead, they go to Charleston or Greenville, which have slightly lower taxes and fees and still offer the amenities of a city. Or they go to Lexington County, where taxes and fees are a lot lower. Since 2009, four major companies have invested nearly $80 million in Lexington County, just across the Congaree River from Columbia’s amenities, with promises of 1,600 new jobs.
#91
Posted 22 February 2011 - 09:07 PM
#92
Posted 23 February 2011 - 01:31 PM
#93
Posted 25 February 2011 - 10:31 AM
Quote
As an alternative, they are developing a long-term strategy to encourage more small businesses and attract corporate offices for larger companies, such as insurance giant Aflac, which last week announced plans to hire 100 more people at its Columbia offices...
Benjamin knows landing “an elephant,” or a large industrial employer, is unlikely for the city because the taxes are too high and the city can’t provide a big enough building.
Instead, Benjamin prefers to focus on the city’s “sweet spot.”
“Office developments, regional headquarters, national headquarters — and make sure we have good A and B office space to accommodate them,” he said.
These are the types of developments--more white-collar and knowledge-based--that tend to propel a city into the next tier and generate wealth (e.g., Raleigh, Austin). Columbia would definitely do well to go this route instead and harness the power of its educational institutions to do so.
#94
Posted 20 April 2011 - 02:21 PM
The Obama administration is proposing a demonstration project funded with $450 million that would be divided between two reactors, with matching funds from private investors. That would put the minimum investment for an operational demonstration project at $450 million.
S.C. Electric and Gas Co., the Savannah River National Laboratory near Aiken and several small modular reactor designers are interested in bringing one of the demonstration projects to the region. Potential sites for such a project include the Savannah River Site, the Parr site owned by SCE&G at Jenkinsville, or a major military base in the region, such as Fort Jackson.
#95
Posted 27 April 2011 - 05:56 PM
The World Congress on Ultrasound in Medical Education has attracted registrations from more than 20 countries and holds the prospect of making Columbia and the University of South Carolina’s School of Medicine a world center for ultrasound education, research and development, said Dr. Richard Hoppmann, dean of the USC School of Medicine and one of the hosts of the conference. Hoppmann also said that the USC School of Medicine is fast becoming a center of ultrasound excellence.
Hoppmann hopes that having top executives of major medical equipment manufacturers such as GE and Siemens in attendance could lead to economic development opportunities for South Carolina. “This is why it is so important to have a first-class world conference here,” he said. “I think the time is right. The handheld devices alone are projected to become a $1 billion-per-year business in just a few years.”
#96
Posted 06 March 2012 - 11:36 AM
Regional employment in the industry is approximately 15,000, at an average salary of $62,000, according to the report.
iTsSC is currently working to promote Columbia's leadership in the industry at a national level. The group will recruit new talent to the area and address the short-term shortage of IT workers in the region, the organization said in announcing the impact study.
The report can be accessed here.
#97
Posted 06 March 2012 - 01:27 PM
#98
Posted 07 March 2012 - 11:43 PM
#99
Posted 09 March 2012 - 12:57 PM
krazeeboi, on 07 March 2012 - 11:43 PM, said:
This sounds good on paper, but Aflac is still controlled by the founding Amos family, and so I would assume as good corporate citizens they will keep the HQ in Columbus, GA. Also keep in mind that Columbus is as close to Atlanta as Columbia is to Charlotte, so the issue of getting to a large hub airport is a wash at best. Of course, that doesn't mean they won't expand operations here in the Midlands, it's just that I think it may be a bit unrealistic to think Aflac may move here.
If we're going to land another big insurance HQ, I say we go for the moon and go after a global player. One that comes to mind is Allianz from Germany. Their current Life Insurance North American HQ is in Minneapolis, and has other operations in bigger global cities like Chicago, Dallas, LA, & New York, but if we could market Columbia as a deep insurance talent base that has lower costs and is close to Charlotte and it's already established flights to Munich (which already serves as an unofficial "BMW Shuttle" from the Upstate), it may be worth a shot.
The problem with global insurance/risk management is that it is more intimately connected with global finance, and as such may see more value in locating its higher-value operations in large, established global cities like NY, London, LA, etc. This is different from manufacturing where a smaller and/or less developed but otherwise economically ambitious region can punch above their weight (as the Upstate has done very well over the last 20 years; Nashville also got Nissan to relocate its NA HQ from California) because manufacturing can find value in more greenfield locations. What that means is that if we can't get a big global player to land their North American HQ here, then at least we should try to get a large regional operation. Something like how Chase has big operation in Columbus, Ohio (a city I think we should try to emulate more). Another European insurance firm I can think of is Zurich.
#100
Posted 10 March 2012 - 03:02 PM
I also think that Columbia should take some plays out of Columbus, OH's playbook, as that city is like a larger Midwestern counterpart of Columbia, both being centrally located state capitals home to huge universities, located along a river, having large insurance clusters, and even being named after the same person.
Good points overall.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













