Research Triangle Park (RTP) & the Triangle Biotech Cluster
#281
Posted 06 December 2009 - 09:49 AM
#282
Posted 09 December 2009 - 05:46 AM
http://www.newsobser...ory/232124.html
#283
Posted 29 December 2009 - 04:35 PM
Gard, on 09 December 2009 - 05:46 AM, said:
http://www.newsobser...ory/232124.html
#284
Posted 07 January 2010 - 04:36 AM
http://blogs.newsobs...ing-to-triangle
#285
Posted 13 January 2010 - 10:06 AM
http://www.newsobser...ory/281473.html
Edited by Gard, 13 January 2010 - 10:08 AM.
#286
Posted 10 August 2010 - 07:46 PM
http://blogs.newsobs...w-vaccine-plant
#287
Posted 28 August 2010 - 12:42 PM
http://www.newsobser...rylink=misearch
It's an interesting time for RTP. Nortel (at one time the park's second-largest employer) is nearly out of business, and Sony Ericsson is shutting down here. IBM's headcount in RTP has been flat at best. GSK headcount is trending down, and Cisco hasn't been growing recently either.
Meanwhile, development and annexation have essentially surrounded RTP and prevent the park from expanding its boundaries. A number of office parks with less restrictive covenants have sucked off many of the smaller employers like Lenovo. Although the park's common area at NC 54 near Davis Drive was renovated, it hasn't been successful. Some of the original buildings in RTP, like the Hercules facility, aren't attractive to new companies and lie idle -- or have been razed already, like part of the original EPA complex.
The good news is that the Triangle remains attractive to corporations and RTP enjoys easy access to RDU. Roads into the park are much better than 25 years ago. The park still has a lot of undeveloped land; if the covenants were revised to allow higher density, the park could probably accommodate many times its current headcount. Of course, that would require some type of mass transit into the park.
#288
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:09 PM
ctl, on 28 August 2010 - 12:42 PM, said:
http://www.newsobser...rylink=misearch
It's an interesting time for RTP. Nortel (at one time the park's second-largest employer) is nearly out of business, and Sony Ericsson is shutting down here. IBM's headcount in RTP has been flat at best. GSK headcount is trending down, and Cisco hasn't been growing recently either.
Meanwhile, development and annexation have essentially surrounded RTP and prevent the park from expanding its boundaries. A number of office parks with less restrictive covenants have sucked off many of the smaller employers like Lenovo. Although the park's common area at NC 54 near Davis Drive was renovated, it hasn't been successful. Some of the original buildings in RTP, like the Hercules facility, aren't attractive to new companies and lie idle -- or have been razed already, like part of the original EPA complex.
The good news is that the Triangle remains attractive to corporations and RTP enjoys easy access to RDU. Roads into the park are much better than 25 years ago. The park still has a lot of undeveloped land; if the covenants were revised to allow higher density, the park could probably accommodate many times its current headcount. Of course, that would require some type of mass transit into the park.
I agree. I work in the RTI campus which has just put up two new buildings in as many years, but the rest of the RTP seems to be slowly declining. I'm sure once the economy picks up again this will have a direct impact on the park. I'm glad to see that people are paying attention to the area though and moving towards making it a better place. As for mass transit, I couldn't be more for that. That north raleigh to rtp commute blows.
#289
Posted 31 August 2010 - 07:43 AM
Most of the construction in RTP in the last 15 years has been along or south of Hopson Road. Those areas still look good. A few of the older buildings, like the American Assoc. of Textile Chemists and Colorists at Cornwallis & Davis, have a nice retro appearance. Some of the other buildings, however, like the former TUCC aren't holding up well.
#291
Posted 24 January 2012 - 03:47 PM
As the RTP continues to evolve with its new masterplan, it will be interesting to see what they come up with.
#292
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:28 PM
#293
Posted 25 January 2012 - 08:51 AM
#294
Posted 25 January 2012 - 08:12 PM
One problem faced by RTP going forward is competition from Raleigh (both downtown and the Centennial Campus) and Durham (e.g. American Tobacco complex).
#295
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:47 AM
Edited by DanRNC, 26 January 2012 - 09:51 PM.
#296
Posted 26 January 2012 - 07:07 PM
#297
Posted 18 May 2012 - 06:58 AM
http://www.bizjourna...me-reality.html
#298
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:51 AM
I'd say because there is no Wake Tech campus in that corner, so it is doesn't overlap coverage from their other campuses, so it makes logistical sense.
#299
Posted 19 May 2012 - 10:56 AM
#300
Posted 19 May 2012 - 01:50 PM
It's fine to be a proponent of downtown Raleigh, but the reality is that fewer than half of Wake County residents live in Raleigh -- and that percentage has been dropping consistently for 30 years now.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













