Jacksonville Transit
#201
Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:05 PM
Is time right for regional transportation authority?
http://www.jaxdailyr...?Story_id=44451
#202
Posted 30 January 2006 - 03:52 PM
#203
Posted 28 July 2006 - 02:06 PM
Steve
#204
Posted 24 August 2006 - 05:45 PM
Aliza
Edited by jacksonviller, 25 August 2006 - 12:30 AM.
#205
Posted 26 August 2006 - 06:51 AM
Steve
#206
Posted 26 August 2006 - 09:54 AM
http://www.jtaonthemove.com/services/
#207
Posted 28 August 2006 - 01:01 PM
#208
Posted 08 January 2007 - 04:17 PM
#209
Posted 10 January 2007 - 05:13 PM
#210
Posted 11 January 2007 - 10:07 AM
#211
Posted 16 June 2007 - 07:55 PM

Does JTA think we can duplicate the success of BRT in Curitiba? Why are they quoting ridership from a City of 5 million, with a 50% poverty rate? Is this what they really want in Jacksonville?

Light Rail just COSTS TOO MUCH or so JTA would have you think. The boys at the TU didn't investigate those claims, just repeated them. Why? Because THIS is what they are quoting, LRT in a SUBWAY! No wonder it cost's so much! Will they put their numbers side by side with the Pittsburgh, Busway through the old Wabash Railroad tunnel? Of course not, THAT would be too honest, laying apples and apples next to each other isn't their style. This scene of St. Louis, Missouri, LRT.
Jacksonville needs a mix. BRT has worked in Sprawling Los Angeles, because it is an EXTENSION of the Metro-Rail system. Without Metro-Rail, it's ridership would be about the same as the regular buses. Imagine, a regular bus route. and these dopes at JTA are going to pay 55 million a mile for it? How Stupid. The Times-Union, commented in 2004 that they "studied" LRT but it was just too costly. This proves two things.
JTA is dumb as rock
and
The Times-Union is a trained parrot for Jacksonville's misleaders

Memphis pulled this off for how much? JTA wouldn't say because the truth would indeed set you free! Is ANYBODY at the TU willing to check on what I am saying? WRITE TO ME GUYS... I'll get them the numbers!
The new Streetcar line in Memphis has cost a whopping 3 million dollars a mile! The new buses in Eugene, Oregon's BRT system are costing them 950,000 per vehicle. For only 1.2 million per vehicle they could have had Modern Streetcars. Let's see now, the streetcars are bigger, they are faster, they don't pollute, they are MUCH more quiet, and they last about 20-30 years to 10 for the dumb bus. Oh, let's not forget that the road the BRT runs on will have to be resurfaced every 5 to 8 years. THAT ought to make them WAY cheaper then rail. NOT! JTA is telling lies and the public buys it hook line and sinker because they have never experienced REAL Transit. Shame on the City, JTA and the TU for not being "The Bold New City of the South." Sad...[/b]

I want to know why Albuquerque, Austin, and Portland were able to do THIS, for less then the Billion dollars we are going to pay for another bus line? Could it be because they have more sense in 10 minutes, then JTA displays in a whole year?
[b]traintrain
Edited by traintrain, 17 June 2007 - 01:48 PM.
#212
Posted 17 June 2007 - 04:27 PM

JTA imagines this in downtown Jacksonville? When one holds their feet to this fire they quickly back-peddle to say the downtown transit mall will be more like surface streets. Sorry JTA, but if THAT is true then all of the "speed" benefits of BRT just flew out the window. Spell this delima as traffic, congestion and even less available parking.
So JTA says they HAD to abandon Light Rail because it was far too expensive. They have convinced City Hall, Tallahassee, Washington and perhaps the Times-Union that BRT or "Bus Rapid Transit" is going t be the salvation of transportation in Jacksonville. No one in the media has called their hand on this, because no one still living in Jacksonville, has a clue what rail transit is all about.
One has to wonder about loyalty's and preferences of a "Transportation Authority" that is also the local highway builder. This is rare indeed, so rare that Jacksonville is one of only TWO City's in the USA to have an agency with such conflicting purposes. Frankly, splitting up JTA into two separate agency's would be a real smart move. With highway trust fund, and Big Oil money, still rattling around in their pockets, they keep coming out with fuzzy math, right out of the highway lobby hand book.
JTA, will parrot the numbers from the successful BRT system in Curitiba, Brazil and Bogota, Colombia, as examples of how attractive "quality bus" on it's own highway can be. They will quote ridership figures from the Los Angeles, Metro-Rapid bus system, to prove this concept will work in Jacksonville. Cheaper, and "just like rail" is their battle cry. Let's look at these claims under the crystal ball of a Transportation Consultant. JTA says BRT will cost us up to a billion dollars and 20 years. Is this cheap? For all of their plans they want to build a bus highway right alongside our railroads? How hard is this to figure out?
Curitiba and Bogota, both have populations of about 5 million persons. Both cities are highly dense. Both cities have a poverty rate of about 50%. So I ask, is it any wonder that their transit ridership has soared with dedicated bus service? Not only did Bogota build bus freeways all over the mesa, they also moved the poor out of town and into miles and miles of new "social housing". All of this new housing is connected to the city center via the new BRT lines. It works! it works! Well duh? But pray tell Jacksonville, just what part of our city looks like Curitiba or Bogota?
What about Los Angeles? Well a trip into the transit web sites for Metro-Rapid show very little gain in ridership except for stations shared with Metro-Rail. In other words Metro-Rapid is an extension of Metro-Rail, Light Rail, commuter rail and subway lines. Someone at JTA please explain where our own Light Rail, commuter rail and subway are? We don't have it!
They are not even planning to tie the BRT into the Skyway, effectively neutering the Skyway as a critical transit link. You will remember, these are the same people that sold us the skyway as "cheaper and better then Light Rail" back in the 1980's. The whole system was designed around express bus service that would feed passengers into the system at end-point transfer stations. Now, hundreds of millions of dollars later, they have another idea?
Someone please ask them to explain why New Jersey Transit, Pittsburgh and the Twin Cities dumped BRT?
Why did Pittsburgh experience a crash in ridership in it's brand new Southside Busway, while experiencing a surge of riders in it's LRT system? When JTA tells you it's because a bridge was closed and it shut down the busway... well guess what Sherlock, it shut down the LRT line too!
So what about Dallas and Phoenix? Read on Jacksonville:
Quote
Plano, Texas, was progressive with its light-rail leg.
It had a mixed-use condo project up and running before the line opened. That project spurred other investments in the city's ailing downtown, and it wasn't long before folks started traveling the rail to eat or shop in a vibrant, pedestrian-friendly gathering spot.
On the other hand, Garland, Texas, hemmed and hawed about light rail.
It built an adjacent arts center facing away from the light-rail stop and didn't get any mixed-use projects under way before rail opened, so there are no new residents and nothing to woo customers a few blocks to the town square. Not surprisingly, the place still looks like a ghost town.
If history repeats itself, and you know it often does, Tempe is on track to be Plano, revitalizing Apache Boulevard as Plano revitalized its downtown.
And Mesa will end up like Garland, dooming itself to an endless game of catch-up.
From the Arizona Republic Newspaper as located by The Arizona Association of Railroad Passengers
Finally there is the question of costs. A Billion Dollars and 20 years, for another road, and a hand full of new buses? I could name Modern Streetcar systems all over the globe that have come in faster and cheaper then that. Take a look at Albuquerque and Portland for information on what they did. Both are experiencing huge TOD developments too. Explain who would spend millions of dollars for a TOD on a bus route when tomorrow JTA might decide to move the route over a few blocks? But what about those expensive new busways, aren't they permanent? Sorry JTA but you and I both know a busway is just another word for a highway with buses on it. There is nothing that says automobiles can't move right in when you start spending our money on your next nightmare.
Memphis, Dallas, Kenosha and other cities have built Heritage Trolleys (real historic Streetcars, under wire and on train tracks)for as little as 3 million dollars a mile. Those same tracks and wires could be used for Modern Streetcars. So it is possible to do this, get the system up and running for less. Why is JTA claiming the High Road and cheap route when their project will cost 16 TIMES the amount of Heritage Trolleys?

Look at these two photos, did you know this modern streetcar or the historic trolley can operate on the same system? True

So costs off the shelf?
Heritage Trolley Car @500,000 dollars (60+ year life)
Modern Streetcar @1.2 million dollars (est. 30 year life)
BRT hybrid bus @950,000 dollars (10 year life)
Heritage Trolley Track and Wire @3-5 dollars million per mile (permanent)
New BRT busway @25-55 million dollars per mile (5-10 year life before resurfacing)
TOD'S:
Light Rail/Trolley: solid track record of TOD
BRT: no evidence of BRT motivated TOD
So Jacksonville, what do we do with these fools? Are we going to allow ourselves to be talked into a new Garland or Mesa? I think it is time to rally the citizens and raise some very vocal protests. Get the Times-Union to do it's homework and send out the attack dogs. This is a dirty, stinking, beefy and bloody story just waiting to be told. Contact me if you wish, I love a good debate. The trouble with debating JTA is, rather like fighting an unarmed opponent. Put another way, Jacksonville, this is so easy a Caveman COULD DO IT, but maybe that is the reason why we can't?
traintrain
Edited by traintrain, 17 June 2007 - 04:45 PM.
#213
Posted 22 June 2007 - 02:13 PM
#214
Posted 06 June 2008 - 11:52 AM
#215
Posted 15 June 2008 - 08:15 PM
Also, buses are required to support a good fixed route transit service, be it BRT or LRT.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













