Jump to content


- - - - -

Bradley International Airport


  • Please log in to reply
633 replies to this topic

#581 Theophrastus Bombastus

Theophrastus Bombastus

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 598 posts

Posted 19 February 2009 - 08:16 AM

I support the private sector as a rule, but I'm not sure about the timing... it seems like all the $$$$$$ is going to be with the 'gubmint' for a while.  There's a poll on the website.  I didn't know that BDL was self-supporting.....

http://www.courant.c...0,3030817.story

GOP Legislators Suggest Selling Bradley Airport
By ERIC GERSHON | The Hartford Courant
February 19, 2009
The Brooklyn Bridge isn't for sale — but Connecticut's biggest airport might be.  Republican leaders in the state legislature have suggested selling Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks to a private owner to raise money for the state treasury, an idea they acknowledge as unusual but say is worth exploring given massive projected state budget deficits.  "It's an idea that merits consideration," said state Rep. William Hamzy, R- Bristol, the deputy Republican leader, who introduced a bill that would "allow the state to privatize Connecticut's airports."  A separate bill submitted by Senate Minority Leader John McKinney, R- Fairfield, specifically calls for studying the sale of Bradley, Connecticut's largest airport.  Airport officials on Wednesday gave an off-the-cuff market value for Bradley of less than $1 billion and said even that figure might be optimistic.  Financially strapped state and city governments occasionally consider selling or leasing public infrastructure, including bridges, highways, garages and airports. Last year, Chicago agreed to a 99-year lease of Midway Airport to a private owner for $2.5 billion, the first privatization of a large U.S. airport.  In the late 1990s, the Federal Aviation Administration began a pilot program to privatize U.S. airports as a way of raising money for airport improvements, but it found little interest.  Airports Council International, which represents airports, does not have a position on airport privatization, which has been hindered by opposition from airlines.  The bills concerning Bradley and Connecticut's five other state-owned airports — mostly small ones with no scheduled commercial passenger service — received their first public hearing Wednesday before a joint session of the transportation and commerce committees.  Transportation Commissioner Joseph F. Marie told legislators that his department, which owns and operates Connecticut's airports, opposes selling Bradley or privatizing it, saying that attempts elsewhere been unsuccessful.  Bradley supports itself through user fees and gets no funding from the state.  Legislators at the hearing generally said they were wary of selling the airport. Some noted that there are options other than the status quo and total privatization. A new public-private agency with greater autonomy from the state bureaucracy, for example, might not raise additional money for the state but might make Bradley more efficient.  Several committee members who expressed reservations about a sale said, nonetheless, that they want Bradley and the transportation department to be more involved in economic development projects outside the airport.  "DOT does a great job running roads," said Sen. Gary LeBeau, D- East Hartford. "But I'm not sure they're great at economic development."  The committee took no action on the bills.  L. Scott Frantz, a new senator from Greenwich and former chairman of Bradley's board of directors, said that he opposed selling the airport, especially in a recession, when getting top dollar is unlikely.  "I don't think we should even be looking for a buyer," he said.

 

#582 The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,965 posts
  • Location:Wethersfield, Hartford

Posted 19 February 2009 - 10:36 AM

BAD BAD BAD idea right now.

First off the state pays nothing to run the airport because its self supporting, so its not like its a drain on the state.  
I do not know why we would selling the states best performing asset at a time when no one has the money or bonding capability to buy it.

maybe if we were riding the bubble still and the state could get a sweet chunk of change.


Now should the state lease out the operations to a private party?  maybe.


I think that the state need to "suffer" through its past errors right now and fix the pension system and learn some fiscal responsibility.  once that is done I wouldnt mind the selling of the airport.  Think about it, if you hand a billion to the state it will just be used to cover past mistakes as a bandaid.  lets fix things, and then if we had a plan to spend the money in a way that created economic growth I might be inclined to support the idea.

How about this... sell the airport once the commuter rail is completely planned and approved.  Use 30% of the sale price to do the maximum build out on the system wich includes the Bradley connector.  Use another 10% of the sale price to build the waterbury Hartford line(projected cost is $60M for a bare bones version).  And use another 10% as an operational budget reserve for the rail network.  This would leave 1/2 of the sale price to use on other projects.  Also by building this extensive rail network and connecting it to the airport, the state would be able to get a better price.

Mind you I would like to see that other 50% spent on transportation or economic development.  I also think it should mostly be spent around the Hartford region since the asset being sold was developed with hartford transportation monies.  just like I would like to any proceeds from the Norwich hospital site go to Norwich area.

#583 beerbeer

beerbeer

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,453 posts
  • Location:Washington, DC

Posted 19 February 2009 - 11:19 AM

Companies sell off non-producing assets not money makers.  This sounds lie a bad idea.

I would love to see Bradley taken away for the DOT and run by a board of directors, but I don't think selling the airport would improve it in any way.

#584 drc72

drc72

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,868 posts
  • Location:Greater Hartford, CT USA

Posted 19 February 2009 - 03:20 PM

I'm all for privatization, but in all honesty I think the State shouldn't sell it.

#585 Theophrastus Bombastus

Theophrastus Bombastus

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 598 posts

Posted 27 March 2009 - 10:32 AM

EZ come, EZ go...

Northwest Suspends Bradley's Amsterdam Flight
By ERIC GERSHON | The Hartford Courant
12:23 PM EDT, March 27, 2009
For Northwest Airlines, it's on again, off again with Bradley International Airport.  Bradley officials said today that the airline, now part of Delta, has "suspended" the flight to Amsterdam that was scheduled to resume on June 3, citing "the challenging economic climate and poor advance reservations."  It was just last December that the airline announced it would take a second shot at making money on the Hartford-Amsterdam route that it flew from July 2007 through early October 2008. The airline blamed record-high fuel prices as the reason for ending the flight the first time.  In December, Northwest said its merger with Delta, which created the world's biggest airline, would generate enough passenger volume to support the flight. Fuel prices had also fallen precipitously. And Bradley had promised to chip in $500,000 to help advertise the return of the Amsterdam flight and offset fees it charges the airline.  "Given the challenging economic climate and poor advance reservations, airline officials from Delta Air Lines decided that the flight is not financially viable at this time, but will be reconsidered as economic conditions improve," Bradley said in a statement. "A reduction in the flight schedule from daily to four times a week, and lower fuel costs, still couldn't offset a drop in demand, which has affected the entire industry."

#586 beash19

beash19

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 85 posts
  • Location:Farmington

Posted 09 April 2009 - 09:51 PM

View Postbeerbeer, on Feb 19 2009, 01:19 PM, said:

Companies sell off non-producing assets not money makers. This sounds lie a bad idea.

I would love to see Bradley taken away for the DOT and run by a board of directors, but I don't think selling the airport would improve it in any way.


I assume you mean that Bradley should be taken away FROM the DOT and I agree.  The best thing that could happen to the airport would be for the DOT to no longer be in control.  Government proves one thing, time and time again...they are worthless.  Read below...CT is no different than Hawaii's gov.

http://www.cnn.com/2...pair/index.html

We could use people like this in New Britain.  Even after the millions spent on "repairing" roads and sidewalks last year, this city's roads are in shambles.  I drove through the 2nd coming of the Grand Canyon on my way home from work today.

#587 Theophrastus Bombastus

Theophrastus Bombastus

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 598 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 10:54 AM

I vote for HartfordTycoon.... seriously, let's get two full-scale modern terminals in place, high speed rail from Htfd/Spfld/NH, international flights, decent retail, etc.

Bradley Adminstrator Resigns
The Hartford Courant
12:45 PM EDT, April 17, 2009
Bradley Airport Adminstrator Jeff Schultes has resigned after less than a year on the job, the state Department of Transportation announced Friday.
The resignation takes effect May 1. A DOT spokesman said Schultes was leaving for " personal reasons," but would not elaborate.
"Both the governor and the Connecticut DOT...are intent on bringing in top quality leadership in the near future," DOT spokesman Kevin Nursick said. "That ball is rolling."

Edited by Theophrastus Bombastus, 17 April 2009 - 10:55 AM.


#588 HartfordTycoon

HartfordTycoon

    Town

  • Moderators
  • 3,171 posts
  • Location:North Hartford - Blue Hills/ Downtown Hartford

Posted 20 July 2009 - 01:49 PM

Bradley finally has a real sit down restaurant in the new terminal. This has been a really long time coming and I think its great that we finally have one. It's another step towards positioning Bradley to at least be on par with other U.S. Airports.


Hartford Courant

The sit-down restaurant is the first of its kind at Bradley. Representatives from the chain in the spring made a presentation to Bradley's board of directors, and said it would have places for travelers to plug in computers and cell phones and areas to store luggage.


#589 The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,965 posts
  • Location:Wethersfield, Hartford

Posted 20 July 2009 - 02:37 PM

View PostHartfordTycoon, on Jul 20 2009, 01:49 PM, said:

Bradley finally has a real sit down restaurant in the new terminal. This has been a really long time coming and I think its great that we finally have one. It's another step towards positioning Bradley to at least be on par with other U.S. Airports.


Hartford Courant

The sit-down restaurant is the first of its kind at Bradley. Representatives from the chain in the spring made a presentation to Bradley's board of directors, and said it would have places for travelers to plug in computers and cell phones and areas to store luggage.

Very nice.

Black bear is expanding big time I guess.

I will have to remember that there is a proper place to eat next time I have a few minutes at the airport.

I really think the perception of Bradley is starting to slowly change.  with the repairs now complete on that runway, and black bear in the new terminal, we just need the market to recover so traffic picks up again and we might get back to Europe.

If the commuter rail runs a spur there I think the growth at Bradley will be staggering.

#590 HartfordTycoon

HartfordTycoon

    Town

  • Moderators
  • 3,171 posts
  • Location:North Hartford - Blue Hills/ Downtown Hartford

Posted 21 July 2009 - 12:04 PM

Article detailing the business deal behind bringing Black Bear to Bradley.

Connecticut Post

Air travelers have never relished long layovers or delayed flights at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks, but because of the arrival of a Black Bear Saloon, part of Stamford-based Post Road Entertainment, there's a new place to go in addition to reading books or playing with Blackberrys.

Management of Post Road Entertainment joined with representatives of food concessionaire Michell Bradley Group and airport officials last week to celebrate the opening of the restaurant and the continuation of a plan to make New England's second-busiest airport more inviting.

In the newer Terminal A, the Black Bear is the first sit-down, full-serve restaurant at the airport, said Kiran Jain, director of marketing and development for Bradley, which is operated by the state Department of Transportation.

"Our intent has been to have a restaurant of this caliber. It's part of our master food concessionaire plan," she said, adding that a survey of airport patrons revealed a desire for a sit-down restaurant. "I think it's going to be extraordinarily inviting."

The airport is an ideal location for the newest Black Bear, said Nicole Steeger, director of operations at Post Road Entertainment, which also operates the Hula Hank's, Thirsty Turtle, Kelly's Pub and 84 Park restaurants in metropolitan New York and Connecticut.



#591 beerbeer

beerbeer

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,453 posts
  • Location:Washington, DC

Posted 21 July 2009 - 12:39 PM

For many years the hotel has had a sit down restaurant accessible from the terminals., these people have a memory of a nano-second.

#592 HartfordTycoon

HartfordTycoon

    Town

  • Moderators
  • 3,171 posts
  • Location:North Hartford - Blue Hills/ Downtown Hartford

Posted 21 July 2009 - 01:17 PM

View Postbeerbeer, on Jul 21 2009, 02:39 PM, said:

For many years the hotel has had a sit down restaurant accessible from the terminals., these people have a memory of a nano-second.

I think they meant a restaurant in the terminal beyond the security checkpoint the way other U.S. Airports do. So that you don't have to worry about going through the line again and missing your flight after a meal. Not that Bradley's security line takes all that long but it is a lot more convenient.

#593 Theophrastus Bombastus

Theophrastus Bombastus

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 598 posts

Posted 26 August 2009 - 07:07 AM

The Rodney Dangerfield of airports.

Embraer Closes Jet Maintenance Center At Bradley Airport Months After Opening
http://www.courant.c...0,7319658.story

#594 The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,965 posts
  • Location:Wethersfield, Hartford

Posted 26 August 2009 - 08:36 AM

View PostTheophrastus Bombastus, on Aug 26 2009, 08:07 AM, said:

The Rodney Dangerfield of airports.

Embraer Closes Jet Maintenance Center At Bradley Airport Months After Opening
http://www.courant.c...0,7319658.story


seriously

I read this article too and thought how damn silly "everything Bradley" is.

I have high hopes for the airport once the commuter rail opens, but it sems all my hopes ammount to a hill o beans

#595 drc72

drc72

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,868 posts
  • Location:Greater Hartford, CT USA

Posted 30 August 2009 - 10:19 AM

I'm not surprised considering the state of the economy.

#596 Theophrastus Bombastus

Theophrastus Bombastus

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 598 posts

Posted 22 October 2009 - 12:02 PM

View PostTheophrastus Bombastus, on Mar 27 2009, 12:32 PM, said:

EZ come, EZ go...

Northwest Suspends Bradley's Amsterdam Flight
By ERIC GERSHON | The Hartford Courant
12:23 PM EDT, March 27, 2009
For Northwest Airlines, it's on again, off again with Bradley International Airport.  Bradley officials said today that the airline, now part of Delta, has "suspended" the flight to Amsterdam that was scheduled to resume on June 3, citing "the challenging economic climate and poor advance reservations."  It was just last December that the airline announced it would take a second shot at making money on the Hartford-Amsterdam route that it flew from July 2007 through early October 2008. The airline blamed record-high fuel prices as the reason for ending the flight the first time.  In December, Northwest said its merger with Delta, which created the world's biggest airline, would generate enough passenger volume to support the flight. Fuel prices had also fallen precipitously. And Bradley had promised to chip in $500,000 to help advertise the return of the Amsterdam flight and offset fees it charges the airline.  "Given the challenging economic climate and poor advance reservations, airline officials from Delta Air Lines decided that the flight is not financially viable at this time, but will be reconsidered as economic conditions improve," Bradley said in a statement. "A reduction in the flight schedule from daily to four times a week, and lower fuel costs, still couldn't offset a drop in demand, which has affected the entire industry."

SWA starting BDL-DEN service - it's no Europe, but not bad.

#597 The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,965 posts
  • Location:Wethersfield, Hartford

Posted 25 October 2009 - 08:32 PM

yeah they also added some ft lauderdale and other warm climate locations.

they mention them like its no big deal in one of the articles, but in reality, its great to be able to to get people to those tropical places.  even if we become a layover location it creates work and local revenue.

#598 Theophrastus Bombastus

Theophrastus Bombastus

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 598 posts

Posted 19 March 2010 - 08:36 AM

Delta To Add Nonstop Flights In June From Bradley To L.A.

#599 The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,965 posts
  • Location:Wethersfield, Hartford

Posted 19 March 2010 - 10:50 AM

View PostTheophrastus Bombastus, on 19 March 2010 - 08:36 AM, said:

Delta To Add Nonstop Flights In June From Bradley To L.A.


This is great news.  this again re-opens hartford to any business travelers heading to Asia and oceana out of LA.


Added to the recent announcement of the Southwest flights to Denver, Bradley is begining to slightly recover from the damages it took back in 2008

I think that the airport will do very well once the commuter rail is built and connected directly to bradley, but in order for it all to be a successful transportation network, these returning flights need to succeed and lets hope for some more announcements.

#600 drc72

drc72

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,868 posts
  • Location:Greater Hartford, CT USA

Posted 21 March 2010 - 12:41 PM

View PostTheophrastus Bombastus, on 19 March 2010 - 08:36 AM, said:

Delta To Add Nonstop Flights In June From Bradley To L.A.
That is awesome.... Hopefully this a sign that the travel industry is coming back strong.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users