Apartment construction in Fayetteville and NWA
#1
Posted 09 January 2006 - 06:38 PM
On my last trip to Fayetteville this fall, I was shocked the by sheer number of multifamily units being constructed in Fayetteville, particularly on the western side of 540.
I understand that there is a demand in certain areas of town for apartments due to the large and growing number of college students in the city. Still, the sheer number of apartments going up on West Wedington Drive was amazing. Couple that type of development with an abundance of already aging duplex and multiplexes in that area of town, and I see really trouble in the future for that side of Fayetteville.
The "garden style" apartments that are being built have a lifespan generally of 20-25 years before they start falling apart and become undesireable. In our disposable culture, there will always be a nicer, safer apartment complex to turn to.
Here in Dallas, we have reaped many bad things from the huge number of apartment complexes constructed here duing the 70s. They are like a plague on certain areas of the city. These once vibrant apartment communities catering to singles and young professionals are now beyong repair, and havens for crime, drugs and prostitution. The city has begun to rezone some of these properties at the urging of local residents and developers have begun to redevleop the properties into single family housing.
My concern is that the rapid proliferation of these same types of apartment complexes in Fayetteville will leave us with many areas of the city in decline in 20-25 years. I wish there were better planning involved in the wholesale approval and construction of these types of complexes within the city. I think we will all regret allowing these developers to push these projects through to turn a quick buck when we have many aging, unrehabilitable properties throughout the city.
Any thoughts?
#2
Posted 09 January 2006 - 06:46 PM
#3
Posted 09 January 2006 - 11:41 PM
#4
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:24 AM
masons_dad1, on Jan 9 2006, 11:41 PM, said:
#5
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:34 AM
Mith242, on Jan 10 2006, 05:24 AM, said:
#6
Posted 10 January 2006 - 09:23 AM
Mith242, on Jan 10 2006, 05:24 AM, said:
I recall that in the early to mid nineties, when Hannah was the mayor, there was a indeed a power struggle between the pro-development crowd and the smart growth crowd (and even some on the zero growth side).
Before Fayetteville became the mid-sized town that it is today, I think the mentality was to grow at all costs. That is why North College Avenue has all the bad development it has. That is why the huge un-interrupted parking lot at Fiesta Square. That is why in some sections, the hillsides were bulldozed creating erosion danger so that someone could put in a fast food franchise.
Slowly, the effects of this poor planning are being mitigated by redevelopment. A great example of that is the Walgreens at Township and N. College. Now a Walgreens is never what I would consider to be a great development. When Walgreens came in, however, the design and land use standards were in place to ensure that the area was well landscaped and that ingress/egress impacted traffic flow on North College minimally. Its a masterpiece of a project compared to the car dealership that used to occupy that corner.
Hopefully over time, these bad apartment developments will be replaced with good ones.
My concern is that the pace of apartment construction seems only to have increased in the past three to five years and from what I could tell casually driving by, the quality doesn't seemed to have changed.
Edited by DickSonstreetDFW, 10 January 2006 - 09:25 AM.
#7
Posted 10 January 2006 - 03:00 PM
masons_dad1, on Jan 10 2006, 05:34 AM, said:
DickSonstreetDFW, on Jan 10 2006, 09:23 AM, said:
Before Fayetteville became the mid-sized town that it is today, I think the mentality was to grow at all costs. That is why North College Avenue has all the bad development it has. That is why the huge un-interrupted parking lot at Fiesta Square. That is why in some sections, the hillsides were bulldozed creating erosion danger so that someone could put in a fast food franchise.
Slowly, the effects of this poor planning are being mitigated by redevelopment. A great example of that is the Walgreens at Township and N. College. Now a Walgreens is never what I would consider to be a great development. When Walgreens came in, however, the design and land use standards were in place to ensure that the area was well landscaped and that ingress/egress impacted traffic flow on North College minimally. Its a masterpiece of a project compared to the car dealership that used to occupy that corner.
Hopefully over time, these bad apartment developments will be replaced with good ones.
My concern is that the pace of apartment construction seems only to have increased in the past three to five years and from what I could tell casually driving by, the quality doesn't seemed to have changed.
I guess I haven't noticed so many apartment buildings being built recently. Although I admit I haven't been on the west side of town much at all in the past year. The few I've seen built around in other areas of the city seem to be a lot nicer than what had been built back in the 90's.
Edited by Mith242, 10 January 2006 - 03:00 PM.
#8
Posted 10 January 2006 - 04:51 PM
Mith242, on Jan 10 2006, 03:00 PM, said:
I guess I haven't noticed so many apartment buildings being built recently. Although I admit I haven't been on the west side of town much at all in the past year. The few I've seen built around in other areas of the city seem to be a lot nicer than what had been built back in the 90's.
#9
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:52 PM
masons_dad1, on Jan 10 2006, 04:51 PM, said:
#10
Posted 10 January 2006 - 07:31 PM
Mith242, on Jan 10 2006, 05:52 PM, said:
Hopefully some of that strong demand and high pricing will translated into redevelopment of some of these older apartment complexes before they become too problematic.
When I get on with a developer up there (hopefully by the end of the summer) I am going to insist that we look at some of the older rentals within the city as possible redevelopment opportunities.
#11
Posted 10 January 2006 - 07:46 PM
DickSonstreetDFW, on Jan 10 2006, 07:31 PM, said:
When I get on with a developer up there (hopefully by the end of the summer) I am going to insist that we look at some of the older rentals within the city as possible redevelopment opportunities.
#12
Posted 10 January 2006 - 11:43 PM
I think the real cheap multifamily housing problems will occur in Springdale and to a lesser extent in Rogers. Somebody should shoot Jim Lindsay for putting up that crap, though. His apt are essentially a single room with cheap partitions and cabinets, suitable only for college students. They are the worst new construction apts I've ever seen anywhere.
Since I live in Lake Highlands down here, I know what you mean. The homeowners are pretty well-off and generally professionals, the apt-dwellers seldom own cars. This neighborhood's deeply divided and basically right now we're putting in TIFs to encourage tearing down of apts for more upscale commercial and residential.
The metaphoric area in Little Rock is Reservoir Road. Those used to be the best apts in Arkansas, now most of those complexes are marginal and one is downright frightening. The houses in Colony West, though, are quite nice and upper middle class.
#13
Posted 11 January 2006 - 12:39 AM
DickSonstreetDFW, on Jan 10 2006, 07:31 PM, said:
When I get on with a developer up there (hopefully by the end of the summer) I am going to insist that we look at some of the older rentals within the city as possible redevelopment opportunities.
I say leave some of these older apartments as they are as long as they pass city inspections so that our lower income residents can live without worry of being thrown out on the streets. Just build the "upscale" apartments and homes away from these "ghettos".
Edited by masons_dad1, 11 January 2006 - 12:47 AM.
#14
Posted 11 January 2006 - 10:16 AM
masons_dad1, on Jan 11 2006, 12:39 AM, said:
I say leave some of these older apartments as they are as long as they pass city inspections so that our lower income residents can live without worry of being thrown out on the streets. Just build the "upscale" apartments and homes away from these "ghettos".
I think his argument and one that is quite apparent in Dallas is that virtually all apartments are destined to become ghetto, even the newer "upscale" ones. It's a gradual transition that happens over a 10-20 year period. There are a lot of apt complexes built in the 80s here in Dallas that were very nice when built and on the exterior still appear so but are really crime havens. Build lots of apartments in a neighborhood and you are ultimately dooming the singly family subdivisions around them is a common argument against them.
Interesting, $550 in rent for a family of 3 is quite low by LR and Dallas standards. That's just about as affordable as anyone could expect without Section 8. Is there really no Section 8 housing in NWA? I find that difficult to believe.
In Dallas and LR I would cringe if new apts went up around me. A decade or more ago in NWA I would be indifferent. I think illegal immigration has changed a lot of that, unfortunately. Now I would be wary of new apt complexes in general.
#15
Posted 11 January 2006 - 11:46 AM
Aporkalypse, on Jan 11 2006, 10:16 AM, said:
Interesting, $550 in rent for a family of 3 is quite low by LR and Dallas standards. That's just about as affordable as anyone could expect without Section 8. Is there really no Section 8 housing in NWA? I find that difficult to believe.
In Dallas and LR I would cringe if new apts went up around me. A decade or more ago in NWA I would be indifferent. I think illegal immigration has changed a lot of that, unfortunately. Now I would be wary of new apt complexes in general.
Right on, Aporkalypse. My experience in Dallas has definitely set in stone my opinion about these types of developments.
Its not apartments in general, is an overabundance of them, and the inevitable decline that "garden-style" (Lindsey-style?) apartments are subject to.
A young and growing city like Fayetteville can learn from the mistakes of larger metros by limiting the size of these apartments, demanding higher quality, and spacing them throughout the city rather than clustering them in a few areas.
I'm afraid the spot-zoning and poor planning of this nature by Springdale city leaders, attempting to grow at all costs to catch Fayetteville, is going to reap decades of regret very soon.
I believe Fayetteville will resist decline because of smart planning and the resulting consistently higher property values.
#16
Posted 11 January 2006 - 12:13 PM
DickSonstreetDFW, on Jan 11 2006, 11:46 AM, said:
Its not apartments in general, is an overabundance of them, and the inevitable decline that "garden-style" (Lindsey-style?) apartments are subject to.
A young and growing city like Fayetteville can learn from the mistakes of larger metros by limiting the size of these apartments, demanding higher quality, and spacing them throughout the city rather than clustering them in a few areas.
I'm afraid the spot-zoning and poor planning of this nature by Springdale city leaders, attempting to grow at all costs to catch Fayetteville, is going to reap decades of regret very soon.
I believe Fayetteville will resist decline because of smart planning and the resulting consistently higher property values.
Again, I think the UA's student population is what will keep things from spiraling down there. Hell, there are some damn shoddy apts near campus that would be awful elsewhere that are in good condition because of the students. Unfortunately, that benefit doesn't extend much to the North.
#17
Posted 11 January 2006 - 12:48 PM
Aporkalypse, on Jan 11 2006, 12:13 PM, said:
I'd like to see a five year record of the police blotter for a particularly notorious rental property on the west side of Fayetteville:
BETTY JO KORNER
I swear that place must have 20 or fewer units yet it was in the news on a weekly basis because it was nothing but a haven for crime when I lived in NWA five years ago.
Properties like that should be tracked, and the Landlord should be sent the tax bill for all of the 911 calls responded to after the first 10 or so per year.
#18
Posted 11 January 2006 - 04:34 PM
DickSonstreetDFW, on Jan 11 2006, 12:48 PM, said:
BETTY JO KORNER
I swear that place must have 20 or fewer units yet it was in the news on a weekly basis because it was nothing but a haven for crime when I lived in NWA five years ago.
Properties like that should be tracked, and the Landlord should be sent the tax bill for all of the 911 calls responded to after the first 10 or so per year.
Edited by Mith242, 12 January 2006 - 05:44 AM.
#19
Posted 12 January 2006 - 01:33 AM
Aporkalypse, on Jan 11 2006, 10:16 AM, said:
Interesting, $550 in rent for a family of 3 is quite low by LR and Dallas standards. That's just about as affordable as anyone could expect without Section 8. Is there really no Section 8 housing in NWA? I find that difficult to believe.
In Dallas and LR I would cringe if new apts went up around me. A decade or more ago in NWA I would be indifferent. I think illegal immigration has changed a lot of that, unfortunately. Now I would be wary of new apt complexes in general.
I agree that building substandard apartments will only lead to more "ghetto's" in the future but a line has to be drawn somewhere as to where the "ghetto's" should be.
#20
Posted 12 January 2006 - 01:42 AM
Mith242, on Jan 11 2006, 04:34 PM, said:
But if you look at these apartment complexes that are havens for drugs and criminals they are not maintained by Lindsey and they are overrun with cockroaches. For $70 less rent you get moldy apartments with rusty A/C vents, cockroaches crawling all over the place, broken windows in some of the apartments and very little if any amenities. But some people just have no choice but to live there because they just don't make enough money to live anywhere else. Not ALL the people that live in these "ghettos" are bad people. Most of them are just people who want to get by and raise their kids without the worry of being thrown out on the streets.













