The West End
#1001
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:56 AM
#1002
Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:01 AM
Edited by citylife, 17 April 2012 - 09:03 AM.
#1003
Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:40 AM
#1004
Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:59 AM
#1005
Posted 17 April 2012 - 12:42 PM
Edited by citylife, 17 April 2012 - 12:43 PM.
#1006
Posted 17 April 2012 - 12:51 PM
citylife, on 17 April 2012 - 12:42 PM, said:
#1007
Posted 17 April 2012 - 02:23 PM
The closing was last October for $650k. Could another Hughes project be starting soon ? Inquiring minds want to know.
#1008
Posted 17 April 2012 - 02:58 PM
Edited by citylife, 17 April 2012 - 03:01 PM.
#1009
Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:27 PM
citylife, on 17 April 2012 - 02:58 PM, said:
I did notice that it had a blank wall like Riverwalk has across the street facing Academy. Hopefully these filler projects get finished sooner rather than later. I love being able to see the density coming into town from Easley on 123.
#1010
Posted 18 April 2012 - 02:52 AM
Edit: Croft also mentioned that his marketing study showed potential for 300 more rental units Downtown. Assuming that didn't include his project or the Riverwalk/100 East projects, that leaves about 100 units left to be built/proposed. Of course if Hughes builds apartments next door, that would probably fill that gap.
Edited by vicupstate, 18 April 2012 - 05:57 AM.
#1011
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:28 AM
vicupstate, on 18 April 2012 - 02:52 AM, said:
Edit: Croft also mentioned that his marketing study showed potential for 300 more rental units Downtown. Assuming that didn't include his project or the Riverwalk/100 East projects, that leaves about 100 units left to be built/proposed. Of course if Hughes builds apartments next door, that would probably fill that gap.
Huh? If he didnt include his project, 100 east, or riverwalk... wouldnt that leave an additional 300 units to be proposed?
#1012
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:39 AM
dwfrp2010, on 18 April 2012 - 06:28 AM, said:
When I read the article, my thinking was that his project would add 100 units of the 300 and leave an additional 200 units to be built by some other developers. It's really anyone's best guess...
Edited by GvilleSC, 18 April 2012 - 06:43 AM.
#1013
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:41 AM
#1014
Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:36 AM
I think the Triathlon space would look really good with a white facade and a legit sign mounted on the building.
#1015
Posted 16 May 2012 - 07:56 PM
A couple things that I really liked about the plan (that have not come to fruition yet) were the idea of extending Wardlaw Street across Main (or was it still called Pendleton Street in 2004?) to Augusta, and realigning University Ridge to connect with Augusta Street at Field Street. Both ideas still seem to be within the realm of possibility, I'd think.
But, what it got me thinking about was the triangle of land between Main/Augusta/railroad tracks. I know that at one time, someone was trying to piece those parcels together for an inclusive redevelopment of that block. Has anyone heard anything more on this land in the past 3 or 4 years, or know of what the status might be? Really, I was thinking that now that the City has gotten the Woolworth block resolved and currently under development, that this site might could use the same attention to finding owners and purchasing their land.
#1016
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:11 AM
Extending University Ridge to Field St. is a good idea, and may be necessary for County Square's full redevelopment, but I don't see a need to extend Wardlaw. That would only take up space that could be used differently.
#1017
Posted 21 May 2012 - 06:00 AM
There is an termination clause that the leasor can use if a >$1mm building permit is issued for the site.
Edited by vicupstate, 21 May 2012 - 06:05 AM.
#1018
Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:08 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













