Most underrated midwest cities?
#81
Posted 09 November 2006 - 11:09 AM
And to a lesser extent, KC. STL always steals the show
It's actually quite ironic, given STL's decayed state
#82
Posted 21 November 2006 - 12:14 PM
kcpimp, on Nov 9 2006, 12:09 PM, said:
And to a lesser extent, KC. STL always steals the show
It's actually quite ironic, given STL's decayed state
#83
Posted 07 December 2006 - 01:21 PM
NorthStar, on Jan 6 2005, 03:04 PM, said:
daniel nudnik, on Jan 31 2005, 11:03 AM, said:
I am from StL and I agree that I wouldn't necessarily call it an "underrated city".
But I disagree with the people that say it only exists because it is part of StL. It is an old edge city and a unique area. It was not planned as a new downtown, it just happened that way. It is actually the county seat, so that IS why there are so many "tall" (not really) buildings in that small area; they have to be in the limits. So it is the "capital" of the greater metro area pretty much...and that is not the same thing as downtown, which is the city, not county.
Yes, some people live there, a few of those buildings are residential.
I don't think Minneapolis is underated, I think it is fairly well known, as well as Pittsburgh. Whether we consider Pittsburgh midwest is another story and I don't want to debate that. Although stating it has a lot of "old buildings" doesn't make it eastern or midwestern. I like both cities, but I don't think they are underated by most at this time.
#84
Posted 07 December 2006 - 01:31 PM
http://www.cyburbia....read.php?t=1349
http://www.ci.clayto...px?location=127
#85
Posted 07 December 2006 - 02:54 PM
#86
Posted 07 December 2006 - 09:43 PM
Chazarelli, on Dec 7 2006, 01:54 PM, said:
.
Chazarelli consider yourself warned. Find other ways to express your feelings about places you don't like or action will be taken against you. Random insults of any place is adolescent in nature, and it has no place here. If someone wants to say they consider some random place in the middle of nowhere the greatest city on the face of the earth, they are more than welcome. You are more than welcome to disagree with them, but you must express yourself in a way reflecting the values of Urbanplanet. Anything such as the above statement, lacks the level of class and professionalism modeled on this site.
#87
Posted 08 December 2006 - 07:35 AM
#88
Posted 08 December 2006 - 09:37 AM
no harm no foul, I take it back
#89
Posted 08 December 2006 - 09:43 AM
#90
Posted 08 December 2006 - 10:47 AM
My girlfriend (and 75% of my best friends) are from St. Louis and I had been all over the city for various reasons, but never to Clayton. It wasn't until last spring when a friend of mine who was working for ARCO construction at the time, told me to meet him there for lunch, did I realize the city.
It is unbeliveable, and I always ask my girlfriend why she never showed me such an awsome place.
#91
Posted 08 December 2006 - 04:02 PM
Nevertheless, it's an amazing little city. Certainly underated.
#92
Posted 21 December 2006 - 01:58 PM
#94
Posted 22 December 2006 - 12:03 AM
I would say that Kansas City is the most underated because I never really thought Kansas City was anything until a little while ago.
#95
Posted 26 February 2007 - 10:16 PM
2. Omaha - beautiful downtown, vibrant street life, colleges, and HISTORY.
3. Milwaukee - underrated and a wrongly deserved bad rap. One of my favorite cities for business that leads to great times. AND HISTORY.
#97
Posted 20 June 2007 - 10:18 AM
#98
Posted 21 June 2007 - 07:50 AM
I have to throw in Springfield, MO for a mid sized city. It gets overshadowed by Madison, WI and Des Moines.
#99
Posted 16 August 2008 - 06:20 PM
#100
Posted 12 August 2010 - 01:01 PM
However, as a 24-year Grand Rapidian, GR takes the cake. I am SOO pleased to see it get pub and credit where credit is due.
Also: experience Minneapolis if you haven't--it's gorgeous.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













