Jump to content


- - - - -

Atlanta Beltline - Emerald Necklace


  • Please log in to reply
348 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 April 2004 - 07:23 AM

This news is very encouraging.  If it makes it in the budget for fiscal 2006, prehaps construction can begin and the line be operational by 2008.

Belt Line plan gathers support
Mass-transit proposal has attracted funding, moved to front burner in region's plans

By JULIE B. HAIRSTON
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/11/04

The proposed Belt Line around Atlanta's intown neighborhoods is racing to the forefront of area transit plans, fueled by financial and public support.


RICH ADDICKS/AJC
(ENLARGE)
Grady Smith, who is guiding the Belt Line study, says 'the possibilities are excellent' for the proposed 22-mile transit loop.
  
Not only has the line, first proposed by Georgia Tech student-turned-architect Ryan Gravel and championed by Atlanta City Council President Cathy Woolard, found its way into transportation plans, it has attracted millions in pledged funding. A nonprofit citizens group has formed to keep the Belt Line's public support growing.

Just two years ago, Woolard began to advocate building the Belt Line. Until then it had been little more than Gravel's graduate thesis: a 22-mile transit loop using existing and mostly idle rail corridor around the city's core. Now, the concept is enshrined in the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority's comprehensive transit plan, the Atlanta Regional Commission's proposed long-range transportation plan, MARTA's planning program and the city's long-range land-use plan.

MARTA is coordinating a $2.5 million study of the Belt Line and a proposed C-Loop line. The C-Loop would travel from south DeKalb County, loop through a number of downtown destinations on its way to the Clifton Road corridor and head north to end at Emory University.

Ed Ellis, vice president of transportation services for URS Corp., which is conducting the study for MARTA, said, "The more we look at this project, the better it looks — the better it looks for congestion relief, the better it looks for supporting the MARTA system and making it more efficient, and the better it looks in terms of rolling it out."

The PATH Foundation, a nonprofit organization devoted to expanding bicycle and pedestrian trails and green space in metro Atlanta, already has raised half of a $3 million pledge in private donations to build bike trails in the Belt Line right of way.

PATH Executive Director Ed McBrayer said the foundation's members long have viewed intown rail corridors as opportunities for extending the region's bike and pedestrian network.

"This one has sex appeal," McBrayer said. "Most transit projects, when you start talking about it, are real snoozers."

Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin, with Woolard's strong encouragement, is pondering forming a tax allocation district to pay for Belt Line construction, estimated between $250 million and $500 million.

Finding money for enormous upfront investment in right-of-way acquisition and construction has impeded new transit in Atlanta and other U.S. cities.

But Ellis is hopeful about prospects for the Belt Line, which probably would be constructed in phases. "We believe that some of the segments could be built out very quickly compared to other projects in the region," he said.

Grady Smith, URS senior transportation manager guiding the MARTA study, said new homes and businesses already are massing along the Belt Line's east side, where further redevelopment is expected to raise property values significantly.

"The possibilities are excellent," he said. The Belt Line's prospects are enhanced, he said, because so much of the right of way is available. Having to buy and clear that much right of way in an urban area would otherwise make the proposed project a lot more expensive.

While the federal government continues to pay 80 percent of the cost of highway construction, Congress appears certain this year to roll back the federal share of funding in transit projects from as much as 80 percent to no more than 50 percent.

City officials are hoping that some type of tax allocation district might give the Belt Line local matching funds it would need to qualify for the scarcer federal dollars. A tax allocation district applies an increase in property taxes collected from a specifically defined area exclusively to infrastructure projects within that area.

Sewer and streetscape improvements in the Atlantic Station development now rising in Midtown were financed through a tax allocation district.

City records show that land adjacent to the proposed Belt Line currently has a taxable value of $244.4 million. If the Belt Line is built, officials are optimistic that the value of the property would rapidly escalate, as it did in the Pearl District in Portland, Ore. The Pearl District attracted more than $1 billion in real estate improvements within five years of the launch of a streetcar line through the former warehouse sector.

Franklin is taking a lead role with the Belt Line now that Woolard has announced plans to resign from the council and run for Congress. In her January "state of the city" speech, Franklin called the Belt Line a "great vision." Along with a proposed multimodal passenger terminal that would connect buses and trains in downtown Atlanta, it is a top transportation priority for the city, the mayor said.

"I certainly see great value in the Belt Line. It's already in the [city's long-range land-use plan]," Franklin said. "So it certainly is a high priority for us to study fully all its implications — and not just for transportation, but for economic development and parks, too."

Franklin said she aims to get the Belt Line in the queue for the fiscal 2006 federal funding cycle. To meet federal requirements, the city must provide details of the district's financial prospects and transportation and environmental merits.

"There is a prescribed schedule," Franklin said. "It is forcing us to be aggressive."

Franklin's full-speed approach to the Belt Line has proponents of other transit proposals around the city complaining that other projects — such as a streetcar line for Peachtree Street — are being put on the back burner.

"The mayor didn't see [the Peachtree streetcar] being on the city's plans anytime soon," said Atlanta City Councilman Lamar Willis, who has been an outspoken proponent of the streetcar. The region needs to pay attention to all of its proposed transit projects, he said.

Woolard said there's room in the city's plans for other projects, although the streetcar, which is being studied by a private nonprofit organization, has not been included in any long-term plans for federal funding.

Streetcar proponents hope to build the line with minimal public investment, but its financial plan is not complete. The project encountered a setback recently when a proposed state law that would have made Georgia eligible for new federal funding specifically for streetcar projects was rejected by the state House of Representatives.

The Peachtree streetcar "is where the Belt Line was four years ago," Woolard said. "That doesn't mean it's not a viable project. It may well be, but it's not in the same place as the Belt Line."

Meantime, public support for the Belt Line continues to grow. Local filmmaker William VanDerKloot has produced a slick video presentation on the Belt Line's potential with Oscar-winning actress Jane Fonda narrating.

Georgia State University President Carl Patton, a leader in Atlanta's urban-revitalization movement, said he is a fan of the Belt Line concept.

"I have driven around a lot of these areas already and seen a lot of vacant land," Patton said. "I thought, 'This is a lost opportunity.' "

Hoping to tap further volunteer support, energies and resources for the project, architect Gravel and a handful of other Belt Line proponents have formed the nonprofit group Friends of the Belt Line.

"This project has gotten so far because of the broad public support for it," Gravel said. "But now that it's getting more technical, we don't want to lose people because it's so technical it's boring. We want to keep it fun and exciting."

 

#2 G W North

G W North

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 470 posts

Posted 12 April 2004 - 11:51 AM

Are the areas around where the stations would be densely built up right now, or are they sparse with parking lots, suburban densities, undeveloped land, etc.?

#3 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 April 2004 - 12:51 PM

There are dense by Atlanta standards, although some of the more urban cities (Chicago, Miami) most of this area is probably an older in down suburb than highly urban.  Part of the plan is that a lot of the area that borders is reliatvely dense by ripe with the opportunity for redevelopment.  I'll try to dig up some aerials or something that illustrate it better.

#4 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 April 2004 - 01:03 PM

It also might help, for those not familar with the project or the city, that this belt line is actually a belt line of neighborhoods in the city, not of the suburbs.

#5 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 12 April 2004 - 05:00 PM

I didn't realize this project was so far along. That's good news.

Could you post a map?

#6 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 13 April 2004 - 12:07 PM

Here is a map with the proposed route and stations.

http://www.cathyatla...ne/maps/map.pdf

#7 teshadoh

teshadoh

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,391 posts
  • Location:suburban Denver

Posted 03 May 2004 - 04:28 PM

Spartanburger, on Apr 12 2004, 05:00 PM, said:

I didn't realize this project was so far along. That's good news.

Could you post a map?
There is progress - but it isn't 'that' far along.  No engineering work has been made, so far they're still trying to get support.  I spoke to the project manager for it a few weeks ago, he works directly for Cathy Woolard, & they have practicly zero technical work concerning this.  He has mainly been concerned with doing research on the area to support the need for a line.

I know I would love it if it's built - I'm a half mile away from one of the proposed stations.

#8 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 03 May 2004 - 04:37 PM

This certainly is a large project. I read somewhere that its not really going to be a part of MARTA in that it wont be the same kind of rail. It will also have sidewalks or something along side of the tracks for bikers or pedestrians. - all of which is nto like the current MARTA stations. Is that still the case?

#9 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 03 May 2004 - 07:00 PM

Yes, this project, as well as the proposed Peachtree Street Trolley, and the recently funded BRT lines (along 285 and 75) all will be independent of MARTA, although they will connect.  Atlanta's express bus system will also be seperate from MARTA.

Makes you wonder how long it will be before GRTA (which will likely operate the BRT, Express Bus, etc) takes over MARTA.

#10 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 03 May 2004 - 08:25 PM

Yeah. It seems counter productive to have so many oranizations of public transit. I think generally competition is a good thing, but in this case you really need one entity that is powerful enough to get stuff done.

#11 teshadoh

teshadoh

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,391 posts
  • Location:suburban Denver

Posted 04 May 2004 - 09:46 AM

Hopefully we will have a new govenor that will put more bite in GRTA's bite.  When Barnes was in office the agency was in the position to take over MARTA & make it a regional transit authority, now the entire transit picture is going in the wrong direction.  Cobb County is in position to control the bus rapid transit line - perhaps integrating CCT into it, the civic organizations for the Cumberland & Perimeter business districts may consolidate the bus rapid transit line on 285 into a seperate authority.  But the belt line & C loop routes should likely be under MARTA's umbrella - MARTA is studying the routes after all http://www.itsmarta....m/planstudy.htm.

What is unfortunate about the bus rapid transit lines - is that they will not invigorate transit oriented development.  They are almost exclusively freeway oriented systems with few transit stops that will mostly be accesible for automobile drivers.  In fact within the city of Atlanta, the only stop that is being considered in at Atlantic Station.  They will be blowing a great opportunity to encourage a massive level of infill development within the city between I-75 & the south towards Marietta Blvd.  I would say the balkanization of Atlanta metro is continuing - but the Atlanta metro has never enjoyed a regional approach to planning.  The Atlanta Regional Commission has some power, but in most cases they can only make recomendations to the municipalities.  

Speaking of which, there 2030 transportation plan is incredibly uninspiring.  What happened to transportation plans that were revolutionary - visionary?  Even if most of the projects don't make it - some projects that were never considered could.  ARC's plan features very little transit (besides the projects that have been discussed the past 10 years).

#12 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 May 2004 - 09:49 AM

There was a huge debate about the routing of the Cobb BRT line.  Cobb wanted it on the freeway, city of Atlanta - seeing the opportunity for redevelopment and improved land use, wanted it run on the street.  Of course, the compromise was to "build both", the first being the highway run and my guess, never build the street level version.  Very disappointing.

#13 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 14 May 2004 - 06:00 AM



#14 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 14 May 2004 - 11:10 AM

heckles, on May 14 2004, 11:25 AM, said:

I hope this works out, however I question whether this is a great solution over revitalizing the existing MARTA system and creating new development around existing stations and inner city streets to make Atlanta more densified first.

i think you will find that many of in town MARTA stations already have, will have, or purposed to have newer, denser developments near them.  Certainly not completely, but there has been a considerable increase.

Plus, this would actually be cheaper to lay the ground work for dense development now, rather than to wait until after it is built.  Transit leading the way is often the better option, it's cheaper to build before the development comes in, and it helps supprot development and redevelopment efforts.  Developers are more likely to jump on board when there is a transit option they can see, feel, and ride, rather than "hoping" one is built.  I think this is a great idea.

#15 Brickell

Brickell

    Burg

  • Editor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,707 posts
  • Location:Miami

Posted 14 May 2004 - 02:19 PM

Are these stops in traditional town centers?   It's been my experience that people won't go from residential neighborhood to residential neighborhood.  I think you need more spokes in the wheel.

#16 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 16 May 2004 - 02:13 PM

I think the concept is to bring more in town residential into the transit picture.  Right now, the majority of Atlanta's intown neigbborhoods are not served by transit other than bus.  However, the existing MARTA heavy rail runs right through the heart of the commerical centers.  This way, more residential/shopping/resturant destinations are included in transit to supplment the existing line that services office/resturant/retail.

#17 ATLman1

ATLman1

    Hamlet

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 996 posts
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus

Posted 19 January 2005 - 10:50 PM

Proposed intown loop seen as $1.4 billion economic engine

By JULIE B. HAIRSTON
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/19/05
Civic leaders and city officials Tuesday hailed a proposed intown loop of transit and green space as a potential economic catalyst as important as Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport.

More than 200 big-money developers, consultants, lawyers and supporters braved temperatures in the teens for an early-morning meeting on the proposed Atlanta Beltline, estimated to cost $2 billion to $3 billion to complete.

EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
MOST POPULAR


  
Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin was out of town but sent City Council President Lisa Borders to echo her recent comparison of the Beltline and the airport.

Borders highlighted the 46 urban neighborhoods that would be connected by the Beltline and the unusually large number of government and private groups working simultaneously to create it.

"We are excited about this project at City Hall," Borders said. "This is a political dream."

Consultant Barbara haga of EDAW, a landscape design firm now putting the finishing touches on the city's Beltline economic study, said new housing, offices and shops along the loop could generate $1.4 billion in property taxes in the next 25 years.

That money, she said, could be used to pay construction costs for the 22-mile circuit of transit, bike trails and new parkland.

Franklin will ask the City Council, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners and the Atlanta Board of Education to approve a special tax district dedicating money to the project this year.

In addition, the Trust for Public Land, which co-sponsored the meeting with the Urban Land Institute, is promising to raise private funds to help pay for the 1,400 acres of parkland the Beltline would connect.

haga said the proposed tax district would allow the loop to be developed holistically. Work, she said, should begin with bike trail and green space portions. That would be followed by privately developed housing, offices and shops along its path.

Finally, haga said, transit could be added to link the attractions and destinations clustered around the line.

Developers already are jockeying to take advantage of the Beltline's promise to connect some of Atlanta's most sought-after intown neighborhoods.

Suburban real estate mogul Wayne Mason now controls a prime 4.6-mile swath of the loop in northeast Atlanta. He took the podium for the first time since closing the deal to declare an end to the days of the "half-acre, swing set and a dog" as Atlanta's residential standard.

Instead, Mason said Atlanta is evolving toward a lifestyle more like European cities where urbanites live over shops, travel frequently by transit and share public recreational areas.

"I follow trends," Mason said. "I invest in concepts."

Many of those gathered at the SouthTrust building in Atlantic Station, Atlanta's first large-scale experiment in urban redevelopment, appeared eager to line up behind Mason.

"We haven't seen this type of excitement since the [1996] Olympics," said James Oxendine, an Atlanta economic development consultant.

Bruce Gunter, an affordable housing developer who lives in Inman Park, called the Beltline "the best idea I've heard in my lifetime in Atlanta."

Beltline advocates were thrilled with the size and tenor of Tuesday's meeting.

Ed McBrayer, executive director of the PATH Foundation and a steering committee member for the recently released Trust for Public Land Beltline "Emerald Necklace" study, said further private investment in the project is virtually certain.

"Every developer from Nashville to Jacksonville was there," said McBrayer. "And I think that's a good sign."

Ryan Gravel, whose Georgia Tech graduate thesis became the Beltline's prototype, now leads a nonprofit advocacy organization called Friends of the Beltline.

He talked about the challenges of coordinating a project now involving at least 22 government and private organizations.

"There's a lot of work that needs to happen by a lot of different groups," Gravel said. "Everybody has to come to grips with . . . how all the pieces come together."

#18 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 22 January 2005 - 06:50 AM

Is this the same thing as depicted here in this diagram?

Posted Image


There was a discussion here last summer about that located in This Thread.    It would be nice to hear an update on it.

#19 ATLman1

ATLman1

    Hamlet

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 996 posts
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus

Posted 22 January 2005 - 07:55 AM

Yes it is.

#20 alexr15

alexr15

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Location:Peachtree City, GA/Stanford University C/O 2009!

Posted 24 January 2005 - 08:23 AM

Check out Beltline.org. It's the official site, I believe. I certainly hope Atlanta can pull this off!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users