Jump to content


- - - - -

DC and Baltimore Area Mass Transit/Transportation


  • Please log in to reply
323 replies to this topic

#1 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 04:37 AM



 

#2 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 04:48 AM



#3 Cotuit

Cotuit

    Megalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 13,396 posts
  • Location:State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations

Posted 30 July 2004 - 06:59 AM

Start calling the Metro a Highway, and people will be glad to fund it. Gotta get all Orwellian on these voters, doubleplusgood.

#4 BrandonTO416

BrandonTO416

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,905 posts
  • Location:Earth

Posted 30 July 2004 - 11:58 AM

AH, 80mph. Rail the way it was supposed to be made. ;)

#5 danwxman

danwxman

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 02:09 PM

I've been on the DC metro twice while visiting. It was very crowded to say the least -- but the trains are fast and convenient.

#6 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 30 July 2004 - 05:30 PM

I had no idea that the DC Metro was so well used.

#7 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 31 July 2004 - 03:00 AM



#8 tocoto

tocoto

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 843 posts
  • Location:Boston

Posted 31 July 2004 - 11:29 AM

DC is a victim of governance by the Federal government which is responsible for the city's budget.  Members of the Senate care little about DC beyond their own facilities and townhomes. It only makes sense, DC has no members of Congress, so citizens are not represented and there is nobody to fight for the city's needs.

#9 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 31 July 2004 - 12:25 PM

tocoto, on Jul 31 2004, 01:29 PM, said:

DC is a victim of governance by the Federal government which is responsible for the city's budget.  Members of the Senate care little about DC beyond their own facilities and townhomes. It only makes sense, DC has no members of Congress, so citizens are not represented and there is nobody to fight for the city's needs.
Yeah they do. DC, and all of the territories have representation there. They have a voice on committees and things like that. They don't have a vote, and that is the problem. The legislation that they work on can be amended or thrown out in the official vote, and there isn't anything they can do about it.

#10 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 July 2004 - 05:42 PM

What other systems besides DC and Atlanta lack financial support from a state government, relying on local counties or sales tax?

#11 tocoto

tocoto

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 843 posts
  • Location:Boston

Posted 01 August 2004 - 09:13 AM

By representives in the Federal governement I mean senators and congressmen.  DC has none and so the citizens have no one with a vote championing their budgetary needs.

#12 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 01 August 2004 - 11:31 AM



#13 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 01 August 2004 - 11:47 AM

monsoon, on Aug 1 2004, 01:31 PM, said:

The Metro carrys bout 3x the number of passengers/day as Marta. 
You can see why too- compare that DC Metro Map to a MARTA map:

Posted Image

Posted Image

The MARTA system looks much more anemic. If MARTA would bulid more rail, more people might ride it. However, if more people would ride it, they might build more.

There are always people using MARTA when I've been there, but certainly not to DC's extent.

#14 Guest_donaltopablo_*

Guest_donaltopablo_*
  • Guests

Posted 01 August 2004 - 01:59 PM

Yeah, MARTA lacks regional support which is why it's construction is so much smaller.  MARTA only has financial support from two counties in the metro area (of 26 currently).

DCs and MARTAs trains are very similar.  DC density over Atlanta and far more extensive system is very beneficial.  Atlanta's system is pretty basic.

#15 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 01 August 2004 - 02:52 PM



#16 Allan

Allan

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 7,035 posts
  • Location:West Villlage 48214

Posted 01 August 2004 - 09:41 PM

Interesting article.  Isn't Dallas's system also a victim of its own success?  Or maybe it was another city...I may be home physically, but mentally I'm still on vacation.   :D

#17 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 02 August 2004 - 03:20 AM



#18 JunktionFET

JunktionFET

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 985 posts
  • Location:Northwest Raleigh NC

Posted 02 August 2004 - 04:36 AM

I loved the Metro back when my family lived in the DC area. I remember being on the train everytime we'd go into the city when I was a kid. We even used it once for a school field trip!

After a 12 year hiatus, I took a MARC train from Baltimore to DC (or thereabouts) during a visit in 2000. That was the last time, I'm overdue for another ride. :)

#19 yochillout

yochillout

    Swoon

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,023 posts

Posted 02 August 2004 - 08:46 PM

I think they should extend the lines into the woodbridge area, where i live.  Also into western areas like manassas and gainsville.  This would help with all the commuters from the woodbridge area all the way down to fredricksburg and as far west as chalettsville.   I think i spelled that right.

#20 Allan

Allan

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 7,035 posts
  • Location:West Villlage 48214

Posted 02 August 2004 - 08:57 PM

monsoon, on Aug 2 2004, 05:19 AM, said:

Dallas's problem is that it went with light rail.   They should have thought about putting in a partial heavy rail system.
Ah, ok.  That's what I thought....




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users