Jump to content


- - - - -

Alabama Roads and Highways


  • Please log in to reply
125 replies to this topic

Poll: Which Highway Project is Most Important? (46 member(s) have cast votes)

Which Highway Project is Most Important?

  1. Birmingham: Northern Beltline (5 votes [10.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.87%

  2. Birmingham: US 280 Improvements (2 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  3. Birmingham, West Alabama: Interstate 22 (10 votes [21.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.74%

  4. Huntsville: Southern Bypass/Patriot Pkwy (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. Huntsville: Memorial Parkway Overpasses and Service Roads (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Huntsville: Alabama 53 Widening (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. Huntsville: I-565 Extension East (3 votes [6.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.52%

  8. Huntsville, North Alabama: Memphis-Huntsville-Atlanta Interstate (7 votes [15.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.22%

  9. Montgomery: Southern Betline (1 votes [2.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.17%

  10. Montgomery: I-65 Improvements (1 votes [2.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.17%

  11. Montgomery, Black Belt: I-85 West Extension (4 votes [8.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.70%

  12. Mobile: Western Bypass (2 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  13. Mobile: US 98 Widening (2 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  14. Mobile: I-10 Mobile River Bridge/Bayway (4 votes [8.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.70%

  15. Other (explain) (5 votes [10.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.87%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 jmanhsv

jmanhsv

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 600 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 08 August 2005 - 06:03 PM

[threads merged, see codyg1985's post #4 for poll description]


I thought this might be a cool thing to start. This would be a place to post anything related to roads and highways in Alabama, whether it be the announcement of a project, a project update, or a comment about the state highway system (i.e. "Why does it take 4 years for ALDOT to build an interchange?", not "it sucks").


Some Huntsville projects:
Proposed- the stuff that's getting funding:
Light rail between USSRC and Botanical Garden
Transit centers in Research Park and at UAH
Southern Bypass- start date 2008
565 extension to Decatur
565 extension to Moores Mill Road- start date 2008
Memorial Parkway overpass extension to Mastin Lake Road- start date 2011
ITS (traffic cameras, electronic signs)- start date late 2005-2006 (NOTE: this is not an ALDOT project- we learned from Birmingham :lol: )

Under Construction-
Memorial Parkway overpass extension to Sparkman Drive- completion date 2008-2009
Memorial Parkway overpass over Whitesburg Drive and Weatherly Road- Service roads to be completed Spring 2006, final completion 2009-2010
US 72 West 6-lane widening to Indian Creek- completion date November

 

#2 jmanhsv

jmanhsv

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 600 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 15 August 2005 - 05:23 PM

Ok.... maybe I should rename this Huntsville Transportation News....

The city of Huntsville has opened up bids for a new "transit hub" in Research Park West/World Famous Bridge Street development. It will include a bus stop and a Park and Ride garage.
http://www.al.com/ne...8530.xml&coll=1

#3 Laseter

Laseter

    Crossroads

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Location:North Alabama

Posted 18 January 2006 - 09:20 AM

Here are some interesting links from the state department of transportation website.

Maps of state transportation projects by division
http://www.dot.state...map=DivisionMap

List of transportation projects by county
http://www.dot.state...aspx?map=County

Edited by Laseter, 18 January 2006 - 09:22 AM.


#4 codyg1985

codyg1985

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL/Jasper, AL

Posted 16 March 2006 - 08:24 PM

I know there are a lot of choices here, and these are not all of the projects, but I think this is a representation of the proposed highway improvments across Alabama.

I think that an important project that I did not list here is the widening of I-65 throughout Alabama to six lanes minimum and eight lanes minimum in the cities of Birmingham, Montgomery, and Mobile.  This highway is heavily-travelled from end to end in this state, and it should be improved for safety as well as to add capacity.

#5 Shawn35816

Shawn35816

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 67 posts

Posted 17 March 2006 - 01:23 AM

I beleive in the extension of I-85 through west central Alabama. This area needs an economic boost. One of the main reasons I beleive that the Kia plant wasn't built near Meridian, Mississippi is because of the lack of a major 4-lane access road from there to Montgomery. U.S. Highway 80 is a here and there 4 lane road from Montgomery to I-20. The area really needs more jobs ( I know because I am from there). This would not only help that area but improve Alabama as well. This area is known not to have the best of schools, and a lack of good jobs.

#6 elb401

elb401

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 229 posts
  • Location:Mobile, AL / Tampa, FL

Posted 17 March 2006 - 08:45 AM

the I-10 bridge/bayway. The tunnel under the river is way to steep and often causes fatal accedents and the growth of the subburbs on the eastern shore are adding to the traffic across the bay.  During the summer months traffic often comes to a stand still from all the people passing through. I just hope the bridge is built further north so the shipping lanes wont have to be crossed. I think the whole bridge thing is supposed to be tied in with the bypass.

Edited by elb401, 17 March 2006 - 08:45 AM.


#7 DruidCity

DruidCity

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 635 posts

Posted 17 March 2006 - 11:24 AM

Quote

I beleive in the extension of I-85 through west central Alabama. This area needs an economic boost.

JMO, improving the north-south  route to Mobile (something the state has promised ever since the interstate system was begun) would have a greater impact on that area. Done correctly, it would become a preferred route between Birmingham and Mobile-Baldwin, the state's two largest population centers.

The I-85 thing is something the Auburn-Montgomery people really want (to take business from Atlanta-west that is currently in Birmingham-Tuscaloosa-Anniston), and something that will also benefit Meridian, MS. It wouldn't do much for West-Central, IMO.

Edited by DruidCity, 17 March 2006 - 11:24 AM.


#8 HSVTiger

HSVTiger

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
  • Location:Huntsville

Posted 17 March 2006 - 11:30 AM

well this a no win vote, but since ALDOT is incapable of completing any project it doesn't matter.
If they just did the projects that have been funded it would get some of these off the list.
Huntsville/ North Alabama has suffered for decades. Build the roads in the regions that are consistently bringing in the jobs and growth. That would be North Alabama . A better solution would be to eliminate
ALDLOT and start over with a highway dept that built roads according to need and not politics.

#9 jmanhsv

jmanhsv

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 600 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 17 March 2006 - 04:52 PM

I think that the I-85 extension would be the greatest economic impact on the state. It would create jobs and improve conditions across an impoverished region of the state. The rest of the projects are important, but they will only benefit a small portion of the state. For example, the 565 extension is important, but it would only benefit the people of Northeast Huntsville and Jackson County.

Edited by jmanhsv, 17 March 2006 - 04:53 PM.


#10 Blazer85

Blazer85

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 731 posts
  • Location:Birmingham, AL

Posted 18 March 2006 - 02:31 PM

I'm not convinced yet on the I-85 extension.  People act as though it'll be some saving grace and just create a huge economic boom in the region.  That's NOT a guarantee people.  It might make it more likely, but alot of companies are still going to be hesitant of locating there because of a lack of infrastructure there and such poor schools.

#11 Shawn35816

Shawn35816

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 67 posts

Posted 18 March 2006 - 03:29 PM

View PostBlazer85, on Mar 18 2006, 02:31 PM, said:

I'm not convinced yet on the I-85 extension.  People act as though it'll be some saving grace and just create a huge economic boom in the region.  That's NOT a guarantee people.  It might make it more likely, but alot of companies are still going to be hesitant of locating there because of a lack of infrastructure there and such poor schools.

Right now there is no real major route (interstate) going through that West Central Alabama area. Either the North-South route from Birmingham to Mobile or the Montgomery to Meridian I-85 extension would help the area. Right now I would say the almost none of the people reading this post travels through that area to go anywhere. If an interstate was run through the area, of course there would be some economic boost because the stops along the route would definetly have new business come into the area. For example the I-85 extension would most likely benefit Selma and Demopolis because they would become the most likely places for people to stop, get gas, and eat. These areas would definetly benefit. Right now there is no flow of steady traffic going through the area so businesses shy away from entering the area. Most people in the area have to travel an hour or hours in any direction to get to some decent shopping destination. There is no doubt this is the area that needs it the most. You can deal with traffic jams for a while, look at Atlanta. This area is a declining area that needs the boost. And I'm not saying it's the most deserving area, because it is definetly not doing a lot for Alabama as a whole except growing a lot of crops and giving us catfish;but the area does need the boost.

#12 codyg1985

codyg1985

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL/Jasper, AL

Posted 20 March 2006 - 04:07 PM

The I-85 extension would open up A LOT of areas for industry and economic development.  OTOH, it is not guaranteed that the I-85 extension would bring the prosperity that is promised by polititians trying to sell the project to his/her constituants.  

A glaring example of this is I-20/59 in Greene County.  Not only does the county have access to this busy interstate, but it also has access to two rivers (Black Warrior and Tombigbee) and two railroads (Norfolk Southern and BNSF).  It sits just to the southwest of the Tuscaloosa MSA. Yet the county is still one of the poorest in the state.

IMO, the I-85 extension would benefit those areas on either end of the extension more than it would the area that the extension would be built through.

I still say that widening I-10, I-20, and I-65 through the state is very important.

Edited by codyg1985, 20 March 2006 - 04:08 PM.


#13 convulso

convulso

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 732 posts
  • Location:alabama; tucson

Posted 12 April 2006 - 01:56 PM

i only know what little i know, but i agree that the concept of laying out an interstate through the center of a depressed (in economic terms) rural area is not necessarily a boon for those who live in its path. i take the backroads whenever i drive from tuscaloosa to auburn, passing all the famed black belt poverty along the way. without having any way of knowing for sure, i have to wonder how badly the people in this area want to be visited by the economic progress that has so many other small towns throughout the state in its thrall.

like most other states east of the mississippi, AL does have historically well-established routes of travel that have been (mostly) shaped by geographic and commercial forces. i believe it would be beneficial to work with the existing pressure points - routes and destinations that have always seen a demand for high traffic. willing a rural area into prosperity by building more infrastructure is a crapshoot - when it works, it's visionary, and when it doesn't, it leaves the cultural landscape changed but not improved. romantic or not, i embrace the notion that alabama can allow its rural, unchanged places the opportunity to stay that way instead of disrupting and homogenizing the little microcultures that time forgets. we have some urban spaces (particularly birmingham and mobile, imo) with great potential, and i would love to see these nurtured...these can be powerful draws for those from rural areas all over the state who decide they want to embrace the urban version of prosperity.

i'm not ennobling the poor rural folk as quaint scenery we need to keep around - FAR from it. i just hate to think that the only way a rural area in the poor deep south can be considered prosperous is to link it with an urban industrial infrastructure.

Edited by convulso, 12 April 2006 - 11:01 PM.


#14 Jerseyman4

Jerseyman4

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,084 posts
  • Location:NC High Country

Posted 23 April 2006 - 02:52 PM

I am not familar with all of the highway projects but it would give me a better understanding with the posts made below mine if all projects were each prioritized with a brief summary of each.   :D

#15 codyg1985

codyg1985

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL/Jasper, AL

Posted 23 April 2006 - 04:09 PM

View PostJerseyman4, on Apr 23 2006, 03:52 PM, said:

I am not familar with all of the highway projects but it would give me a better understanding with the posts made below mine if all projects were each prioritized with a brief summary of each.   :D

Very well....
  • Birmingham: Northern Beltline - This is a proposal to complete the freeway perimeter around Birmingham.  There has been a need for alternative routes in the Birmingham interstate system, epesically with two tanker trucks crashing and destroying two bridges at Malfunction Junction two years apart.  The Northern Beltline would start at the current intersection of I-20/59 and I-459 at Bessemer and run northeasterly through Pleasant Grove and Adamsville before interecting US 78 and future I-22.  It would run north from there then east to cross I-65 south of Morris and north of Gardendale.  It would then run southeasterly and cross AL 79 and AL 75 north of Pinson and Center Point, then intersect with I-59 northeast of where I-459 currently terminates in Trussville.  There is also talk of extending this road from I-59 into St. Clair County in a southeasterly direction north of Moody to I-20 west of Pell City.  This is basically the northern version of I-459.

  • Birmingham: US 280 Improvements - This is a multi-faceted proposal to elliviate traffic on US 280 in southeastern Jefferson and northern Shelby Counties.  Currently US 280 is a six-lane arterial boulevard that begins in Homewood and travels southeasterly towards the affluent suburbs of Mountain Brook, Vestavia Hills, Cahaba Heights, Hoover, and Inverness.  Many shopping centers dot the landscape as one drives through this area, and many more subdivisions are abound right beyond those shopping centers.  At the confluence of all of this lies the US 280/I-459 interchange which is always backed up.  The proposals include at a minimum constructing flyover ramps for the I-459/US 280 interchange to eliminate all the traffic signals at the intersection.   Other improvement proposals range from adding an extra lane in each direction to syncronizing the traffic signals to contructing interchanges as busy intersections along the route.

  • Birmingham, West Alabama: Interstate 22 - Known originally as Appahacian Regional Development Corridor X, this freeway will link Birmingham with Memphis when complete in 2012.  With Memphis being called the "distribution center of America," many trucks use what was once a two-lane US 78 to deliver goods to Birmingham, Atlanta, and beyond.  Once those trucks get to Birmingham, heavy traffic is encountered along Arkadelphia Road in a one-mile stretch to get to I-20/59.  The freeway is complete throughout Mississippi (with some exceptions) and through Alabama to Jasper.  The freeway is scheduled to be opened to Graysville in 2008 (open to local traffic to Cherry Avenue).  The final link at I-65 has not been started, but should begin construction soon.  In Mississippi, some things need to be done to bring the freeway up to interstate standards, not to mention a connection needs to be made to the Memphis interstate system.

  • Huntsville: Southern Bypass/Patriot Pkwy - Over the next several years, about 3000 jobs will be coming to Redstone Arsenal and the Huntsville area due to BRAC.  Motorists from south Huntville need an easier way to get to Cummings Research Park.  The Southern Bypass, aka Patriot Parkway, will be an interstate-grade facility that will begin at the I-565/AL 255/Rideout Road interchange, and follow Rideout Road south into Redstone Arsenal, then take a southeasterly turn through the base, then east to emerge in south Huntville at Memorial Parkway near its intersection with Hobbs Island Road.  This road is part of the proposed Memphis-Huntsville-Atlanta freeway.

  • Huntsville: Memorial Parkway Overpasses and Service Roads - Memorial Parkway is the most heavily-travelled throroughfare in Huntsville.  It has many shopping centers and subdivision entrances on the southern end while traversing the western portion of downtown Huntsville in the middle while providing access to Alabama A&M university on the northern end.  The middle portion of the roadway has been converted to a controlled-access facility that utilizes service roads, slip ramps, and u-turns to keep traffic flowing.  The road becomes a standard boulevard at Oakwood Drive on the northern end and Martin Road on the southern end.  Construction of the service roads is almost complete north of Oakwood Drive to Mastin Lake Road and south of Martin Road to south of Weatherly Road.  The proposal calls for the controlled access system to extend from Alabama A&M on the northern end of the city to the Tennessee River on the southern end of the city.

  • Huntsville: Alabama 53 Widening - Many subdivisions are being developed north and west of Huntsville in the Monrovia area.  Alabama Highway 53 provides a direct connection from Huntsville to I-65 north at Ardmore, and to Nashville.  Many people use Alabama 53 to get to their jobs in Huntsville from as far away as Ardmore and Giles County, TN.  Currently this arterial is a two-lane road from Alabama Highway 255/Research Park Blvd to the Tennessee State Line.  Work is underway to extend the five-lane section about a mile northwest of this intersection.  The proposal is to have a four lane road between here and I-65 at Ardmore.
I will post some more information later, unless someone posts more about what I did not talk about here.

#16 Scoots71

Scoots71

    Crossroads

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Location:Montgomery, AL

Posted 24 June 2006 - 09:44 PM

I-65 in Montgomery once you get into city limits, the interstate is only two lanes. The Interstate in the city has not been improved since it was built. The joints in the cement are coming out creating a roller coaster ride that feels like the axle on your car will break. The two lanes is also very dangerous considering the number of 18-wheelers that come through from the car plant or just passing through. Fortunately, this problem will be shortlived because a widening project just began from the Alabama River bridge to just south of Hyudai Blvd.

#17 codyg1985

codyg1985

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL/Jasper, AL

Posted 24 June 2006 - 10:31 PM

  • Montgomery: Southern Betline: The I-85 interchange with I-65 in Montgomery can be a bottleneck for motorists going from I-85 south to I-65 south.  There has been plans for a southern bypass of Montgomery that will be built to interstate standards.  It would run from US 80 west of Montgomery southeastward to I-65 near Hope Hull and the Hyundai plant, then it would take an easterly jog to US 331, then northeast to US 82/231, then terminating at I-85 west of the Montgomery/Macon county line.  This freeway bypass would spur development on the southern side of the Montgomery metropolitan area, and it may play into a westward extension of I-85.  Some think that this highway will only contribute to sprawl in the Montgomery area.

  • Montgomery, Black Belt: I-85 West Extension: US 80 from Montgomery to I-20/59 in Cuba, AL varies between a four-lane highway and a two-lane drag.  It passes through some of the poorest portions of Alabama, and many have gotten on the bandwagon of extending I-85 west from Montgomery to I-20/59 in Cuba, AL, just east of Meridian and the Mississippi state line.  The proponents of this extension claim that this road will open up the Black Belt to economic prosperity.  Opponents to this extension need only to point at I-20/59 in Greene County, AL, which is also one of the poorest counties in the entire state. I-20/59 has been finished through Greene County for decades, but it has not reaped many benefits from its path through the center of the county.  Not only would this extension affect the black belt, but it would also provide Meridian with a route to Montgomery, and it would provide motorists an alternate route to Atlanta without passing through Birmingham.

  • Mobile: Western Bypass: Over recent decades, west Mobile has experienced rapid development.  Airport Road in west Mobile is a busy boulevard that can become a parking lot during rush hour.  Mobile Regional Airport sits at the end of Airport Blvd, and as such enjoys no direct connection to Mobile's interstate system.  The Mobile Western Bypass would be built to interstate standards, and it would run from I-10 near the new CR 39 interchange northward, passing Mobile Regional Airport to the west, to US 98 near Semmes.  Then, the freeway would take a northeasterly trek to intersect with US 45, then terminate at I-65 just south of the US 43 interchange near Creola.  This project for now has been put on hold by ALDOT due to property disputes from people living near the proposed corridors for the project and lack of public input or interest for the project.  There is also fears that this highway will only cause traffic problems in the area to get worse, as it will cause more sprawl.

  • Mobile: US 98 Widening: US 98 connects Mobile with Hattiesburg, MS and Jackson, MS.  Many out-of-state motorists use this road to get to Mobile and Alabama's beaches.  Mississippi has completed most of it's share of the work to four-lane US 98 east of Hattiesburg, but Alabama still has a two-lane segment from the state line east to Semmes.  Work will soon be underway to construct eight miles a four-lane expressway (not interstate or freeway standard) on a new alignment that will be north of the current US 98.  This new roadway will be north of the current US 98 on a new alignment to pass north of Big Creek Lake, which satisfied local residents who were concerned about construction impacting the lake, which is part of the water supply for the city of Mobile.  Then the roadway will return to its original alignment east of Semmes to the western extent of the US 98 four-lane.  The widening of US 98 has major implications for trucking and delivery interests in the area, as well as hurricane evacuation.

  • Mobile: I-10 Mobile River Bridge/Bayway:  At the end of the Mobile River sits the Alabama State Docks, which recieves a large amount of cargo from overseas and from inland daily.  South of the docks sits I-10, which currently goes underneath the Mobile River via a twin-tube tunnel, two lanes in each direction.  The eastern approach to the tunnel sees the reduction of lanes from four to two.  Moreover, there is a sharp curve immediately before the western portal of the Bankhead tunnel.  On normal days the tunnel is a bottleneck to commuters going into and out of Mobile, and a wreck near the tunnel can tie up traffic for hours on end.  In the event of a hurricane evacuation, the traffic situation near the tunnels is even more dire.  Most important, hazardous cargo is forced to take a detour around the northern portion of Mobile to avoid the tunnels.  A four-lane cable-stayed bridge span is currently proposed south of the Bankhead Tunnel.  The tunnel would remain in service after the bridge is built because access to Water Street and Battleship Pkwy may not be possible from the bridge due to the required height of the approach spans.  Also proposed is additional lanes on the bayway, which is the portion of I-10 that crosses Mobile Bay east of the Bankhead Tunnel.  There has been some opposition to the Mobile River bridge as it may impact development on Mobile's waterfront.  There has also been talk of building the bridge and the bayway expansion as a tolled facility to help pay for the construction costs.

Edited by codyg1985, 24 June 2006 - 10:32 PM.


#18 kayman

kayman

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,168 posts
  • Location:Birmingham

Posted 27 June 2006 - 09:02 AM

Alabama's Twisted Fate: The State's Person to Car Ratio is 1:1

Quote

The number of vehicle miles traveled per capita is an indicator of highway use. The U.S. Census reports that there were 4.55 million Alabamians in 2005. There were 4.54 million private vehicles registered in the state in 2005, according to the Alabama Department of Revenue, indicating a ratio of almost has one car per person.

Quote

"We do like our cars and trucks," Ingram said. "People are not going to let gas prices keep them at home. They may change their driving habits a little bit, but it won't keep them at home."

They also go on to say that we are a rural state.   :blink:  Alabama is nowadays is 70% urban.  We just don't take the initiative to incorporate efficient mass transit into our urban areas.

Edited by Leonard23, 27 June 2006 - 09:20 AM.


#19 codyg1985

codyg1985

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL/Jasper, AL

Posted 27 June 2006 - 11:41 AM

View PostLeonard23, on Jun 27 2006, 10:02 AM, said:

They also go on to say that we are a rural state.   :blink:  Alabama is nowadays is 70% urban.  We just don't take the initiative to incorporate efficient mass transit into our urban areas.

True that most of Alabama's population lies within an urban area, but most of the state, in terms of land area, is still considered rural.

#20 kayman

kayman

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,168 posts
  • Location:Birmingham

Posted 29 June 2006 - 08:53 AM

State ranks poorly in interstate study

Alabama ranks low in TRIP study, but still safe

I guess there is always room of improvement.  I'm glad that I-20 east is now being fixed, expanded, and repaved.  Hopefully, I-65 and the rest of I-20/59 will be next.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users