Jump to content


- - - - -

Lansing, MI Population Prediction for 2010


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#21 hood

hood

    Burg

  • MemberZ
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,642 posts
  • Location:Lansing, Michigan

Posted 10 April 2006 - 07:37 PM

After looking at a map I guess it must be down James St or Washington. I already know of a few severely dilapidated houses that were fixed up this area. Here are a few examples:

217 e Dwight (fixed-up now)
Posted Image

209 Reasoner
Posted Image

214 Reasoner
Posted Image

223 E North
Posted Image

300 W North (my favorite lol)
Posted Image

There are plenty more, but the city just updated its assessors site software so I can't get anymore images than what I already had on my computer.

 

#22 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 10 April 2006 - 07:49 PM

I've been through the area directly north of the Turner-Dodge, and the area is literally under 10-blocks in size, and pretty industrial, as well.  From everything I know, it's not all that crime-ridden, and not incredibly dilapidated, rather, it's more old and poor than anything else.  At its worst it's simply become an irrelevant neighbohood.  I assume the area (more likely a subdivision) originally existed to service the heavily industrial areas around Northtown/Old Town.  Now that the industrial aspect of the neighborhood has declined, or moved up Grand River, there really isn't much there.

Edited by Lmichigan, 10 April 2006 - 07:51 PM.


#23 hood

hood

    Burg

  • MemberZ
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,642 posts
  • Location:Lansing, Michigan

Posted 10 April 2006 - 07:59 PM

I think it does have pretty high crime by lansing standards, roughly the same as the Center St and Liberty/Pearl St areas nearby, it's basically just behind the Eighth/Hosmer neighborhood when it comes to crime. And from what I've seen its in pretty rough shape, largely due to fact that it is post-industrial. One building that is really nice to see get fixed up is the one ACD.net is doing, I don't know if you've seen it recently but it was looking really, really nasty when I went by it a few weeks ago. Here are another couple of pics, as with the ones above they are all within that small 8 or 9 block neighborhood.

1603 Turner
Posted Image

1701 Turner (the blue house in the background is tha same as the one above on Dwight St.)
Posted Image

Edited by hood, 10 April 2006 - 08:00 PM.


#24 Phizzy

Phizzy

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 544 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids Metro Area

Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:00 PM

View PostLmichigan, on Apr 10 2006, 03:31 AM, said:

1. Lansing: 123,223 (+3.4%)
2. East Lansing: 52,380 (+12.6%)
3. Meridian Township: 40,751 (+4.2%)
4. Delta Township: 34,897 (+17.6%)
5. Delhi Township: 25,250 (+11.9%)
Those numbers (except for Delhi Twp) do seem optimistic compared to the Census Bureau estimates:
							  Census  Estimate	 Change
							   2000	 2004	  #	  %
1 Lansing city			   119,378  116,941  -2,437  -2.0%
2 East Lansing city		   46,606   46,678	  72   0.2%
3 Meridian charter township   39,107   38,674	-433  -1.1%
4 Delta charter township	  29,590   30,877   1,287   4.3%
5 Delhi charter township	  22,496   24,822   2,326  10.3%
EDIT: Fixed Lansing's population.

Edited by Phizzy, 10 April 2006 - 09:03 PM.


#25 hood

hood

    Burg

  • MemberZ
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,642 posts
  • Location:Lansing, Michigan

Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:07 PM

Those numbers aren't very realistic. Lansing had over 119,000 in the 2000 census, not 114,000. I can almost guarantee that Meridian will not lose population and with the massive development in the northern tier EL will almost certainly gain a lot by 2010, even the Chamber of Commerces' estimates may be conservative. Delta will almost certainly gain more than what the census bureau predicts. Overall I agree with the Chamber of Commerces estimates, excet for Lansing, I really don't see it gaining by 2010.

I found a "rendering" of the building ACD.net is fixing up on Signature Associates:
Posted Image

Edited by hood, 10 April 2006 - 08:22 PM.


#26 Phizzy

Phizzy

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 544 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids Metro Area

Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:04 PM

View Posthood, on Apr 10 2006, 10:07 PM, said:

Those numbers aren't very realistic. Lansing had over 119,000 in the 2000 census, not 114,000.
You're correct. I forgot to include the portion of Lansing in Eaton County. I've fixed the numbers above.

#27 hood

hood

    Burg

  • MemberZ
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,642 posts
  • Location:Lansing, Michigan

Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:08 PM

I see now, those are only 2004 estimates, the CC's estimates are for 2010, I think.

Edited by hood, 10 April 2006 - 09:08 PM.


#28 Lmichigan

Lmichigan

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:40 PM

Yeah, I'm pretty sure I included that the numbers were for 2010.

#29 coolbrezze

coolbrezze

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 74 posts
  • Location:Mid-Michigan

Posted 26 December 2008 - 08:16 PM

According to city-data.com Lansing may drop to 114,000 by 2007, although overall the metro area population is predicted by city-data.com to increase.

#30 coolbrezze

coolbrezze

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 74 posts
  • Location:Mid-Michigan

Posted 26 December 2008 - 08:16 PM

According to city-data.com Lansing may drop to 114,000 by 2007, although overall the metro area population is predicted by city-data.com to increase.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users