BJCC Expansion plans
#41
Posted 19 October 2006 - 11:42 AM
When are these folks going to ever learn? I am going to write their dumb asses a long e-mail right now telling them to just expand the existing facilities without a stupid dome stadium aspect. What is wrong with these folks.
#42
Posted 19 October 2006 - 01:47 PM
Leonard23, on Oct 19 2006, 12:42 PM, said:
When are these folks going to ever learn? I am going to write their dumb asses a long e-mail right now telling them to just expand the existing facilities without a stupid dome stadium aspect. What is wrong with these folks.
It may be that their own market research shows that a multi-purpose facility is a key component of the business they need to attract and that, from their perspective, the opposition to "a dome" is ignorant and over-simplified. If that were the case they would hope that by updating and refining their presentation, that people capable of seeing past the "four letter word" might be capable of weighing the benefits of the proposal.
The unfortunate reality is that "dome" is a four letter word and its so much easier to leverage ignorance than to re-frame the issue.
The worst thing that could happen is that they finally get what they need to move ahead, but what they build is so compromised (by increased construction costs, cut budgets, and misunderstanding about the purposes for which it was constructed) that it's obsolete before it opens and becomes an even bigger sore spot. The renderings I've seen make me think this scenario isn't completely unlikely.
At this point, I think all they can do is scrap whatever plans they have and come up with a plan that (1) accommodates the boldest, biggest most optimistic vision for the next 30-50 years (2) constructs everything that is politically feasible toward the implementation of that plan and (3) insures that what can get built positions the BJCC to continue competing for at least half of the convention market, and (4) prepares itself for the possibility of adding in the "missing pieces" without having to completely reconfigure.
I think the plan should include a major overhaul of the coliseum to make it useful for large-scale meetings, NCAA regional finals, big concerts and whatever else is out there. This overhaul needs to brighten the whole experience of going to the BJCC and make the whole center more inviting. It could also include a major architectural statement a la the Memphis Pyramid or LA's Disney Concert Hall.
#43
Posted 19 October 2006 - 02:40 PM
Dystopos, on Oct 19 2006, 02:47 PM, said:
The unfortunate reality is that "dome" is a four letter word and its so much easier to leverage ignorance than to re-frame the issue.
The worst thing that could happen is that they finally get what they need to move ahead, but what they build is so compromised (by increased construction costs, cut budgets, and misunderstanding about the purposes for which it was constructed) that it's obsolete before it opens and becomes an even bigger sore spot. The renderings I've seen make me think this scenario isn't completely unlikely.
At this point, I think all they can do is scrap whatever plans they have and come up with a plan that (1) accommodates the boldest, biggest most optimistic vision for the next 30-50 years (2) constructs everything that is politically feasible toward the implementation of that plan and (3) insures that what can get built positions the BJCC to continue competing for at least half of the convention market, and (4) prepares itself for the possibility of adding in the "missing pieces" without having to completely reconfigure.
I think the plan should include a major overhaul of the coliseum to make it useful for large-scale meetings, NCAA regional finals, big concerts and whatever else is out there. This overhaul needs to brighten the whole experience of going to the BJCC and make the whole center more inviting. It could also include a major architectural statement a la the Memphis Pyramid or LA's Disney Concert Hall.
Well put.
#44
Posted 19 October 2006 - 10:18 PM
Leonard23, on Oct 19 2006, 12:42 PM, said:
When are these folks going to ever learn? I am going to write their dumb asses a long e-mail right now telling them to just expand the existing facilities without a stupid dome stadium aspect. What is wrong with these folks.
Seriously. I mean, is it TOTALLY against the laws of Earth to build the dome later? Cause, why not just go ahead and expand the stuff that money is ALREADY appropriated for, and if there's enough support and money for a dome in the future, BUILD IT!
I just don't think they think about the future much.
#45
Posted 21 October 2006 - 06:59 PM
It seems that they are wanting to go on with one part of the plan but is (for the time being) avoiding the dome convention-exhibition complex. The BJCC board members are in talks with Bayers Properties (The Summit owner) and 2 other developers on the construction of the entertainment complex adjacent to the BJCC and the 300-room luxury hotel. This push was due to the pulling out of a recently booked convention for next year due to lack of hotel rooms available in the immediate area. There is a need for at least 2,500 room in the area, but currently there is only 900.
However, the dome's biggest proponent, corrupt politician, John Rogers, is still gawking and pushing for the dome. He claims to have a secret weapon that he will use next year. However, let's no forget that he is the main reason why the license registration bill to fund mass transit died in legislature 2 years ago because the Jefferson County delegate wouldn't support his dome bill.
Edited by Leonard23, 21 October 2006 - 07:01 PM.
#46
Posted 24 October 2006 - 10:44 AM
#47
Posted 24 October 2006 - 12:01 PM
What is with the threats? He tried it with the state and it didn't work. Birminghams biggest obstacle...
"Rep. John Rogers, D-Birmingham, a long-time proponent of the dome, said even if the "d-word" wasn't used at Friday's meeting, he is still committed to building a multipurpose facility and will not push for an alternative.
"We're still on Plan A," he said. "They can call it a Quonset hut, a dome, an expansion or whatever they want to call it."
Rogers said he has a "bomb" he hasn't used yet in the dome debate. Asked to explain, he said there are things the county needs from its legislative delegation that could be hard to get without cooperation.
#48
Posted 24 October 2006 - 02:42 PM
HSVTiger, on Oct 24 2006, 01:01 PM, said:
What is with the threats? He tried it with the state and it didn't work. Birminghams biggest obstacle...
"Rep. John Rogers, D-Birmingham, a long-time proponent of the dome, said even if the "d-word" wasn't used at Friday's meeting, he is still committed to building a multipurpose facility and will not push for an alternative.
"We're still on Plan A," he said. "They can call it a Quonset hut, a dome, an expansion or whatever they want to call it."
Rogers said he has a "bomb" he hasn't used yet in the dome debate. Asked to explain, he said there are things the county needs from its legislative delegation that could be hard to get without cooperation.
Dude is a corrupt idiot that has been derailing every legislative bill in the county including one to fund mass transit because nobody wants to build that dome.
#49
Posted 24 October 2006 - 04:10 PM
Blazer85, on Oct 24 2006, 09:44 AM, said:
If not, it's because they expect such a venture to fail. Why would I trust the business acumen of Birmingham and Jefferson County representatives over someone betting with their own money?
#50
Posted 24 October 2006 - 10:00 PM
#51
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:01 PM
davidzLA, on Oct 24 2006, 05:10 PM, said:
If not, it's because they expect such a venture to fail. Why would I trust the business acumen of Birmingham and Jefferson County representatives over someone betting with their own money?
I echo what Leonard just said. Birmingham also has one of the highest occupancy rates in all of the southeast.
#52
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:58 PM
Quote
Blazer85, on Oct 26 2006, 07:01 PM, said:
#53
Posted 26 October 2006 - 09:28 PM
#54
Posted 26 October 2006 - 10:35 PM
davidzLA, on Oct 26 2006, 09:58 PM, said:
Basically. Both developer have confirmed that regardless of what is the outcome of the BJCC expand if it includes a dome or not they will build their hotels. In other words, they are waiting on the BJCC Board to make their move.
#55
Posted 16 November 2006 - 12:17 PM
All of the BJCC board yesterday for the first-time in awhile with new member Jefferson County Commissioner Bettye Fine Collins.
#56
Posted 16 November 2006 - 02:52 PM
Leonard23, on Nov 16 2006, 12:17 PM, said:
All of the BJCC board yesterday for the first-time in awhile with new member Jefferson County Commissioner Bettye Fine Collins.
Great. That woman is an idiot. Thanks for the update!
#58
Posted 29 December 2006 - 11:47 AM
#59
Posted 06 January 2007 - 10:16 AM
http://www.al.com/bu.../....xml&coll=2
#60
Posted 06 January 2007 - 01:47 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













