Nashville Project Thread
#41
Posted 13 May 2006 - 05:51 AM
#42
Posted 13 May 2006 - 08:29 AM
Also, about C, the BoA tower in NY. I really like that tower, but it would look to bulky at the base IMO to fit in with Nashville. Also, it's 1200 ft tall, and I don't want another spire. I want 700 feet of real floors.
BTW, what is A? I've never seen it before.
Edited by cheeriokid61, 13 May 2006 - 08:34 AM.
#43
Posted 13 May 2006 - 09:06 AM
A and E look too retro and/or overwrought.
C and F look too outrageous for just about anywhere in the world except for maybe China. They don't appear to have any noteworthy aesthetics or style innovation. Also, I think the diamond look will look so tired and dated in about 10 years like all those geodesic domes from the 70s.
Edited by ATLBrain, 13 May 2006 - 09:06 AM.
#44
Posted 02 June 2006 - 02:46 PM
PHofKS, on May 13 2006, 01:13 AM, said:
Here are some proposed towers from around the country that are of styles that some may like for our skyline. What do you think?

I would rate these towers in the following order: G,C, H, D, F, E, A, and then B. I think G is absolutely gorgeous. If Nashville had a 700 footer that looked like that, what an awesome compliment to Signature Tower that would be!
#45
Posted 09 June 2006 - 08:30 AM
#46
Posted 09 June 2006 - 08:59 AM
#47
Posted 09 June 2006 - 03:26 PM
#48
Posted 09 June 2006 - 04:52 PM
UrbanCharlotte, on Jun 9 2006, 05:26 PM, said:
Yes... I don't think there are very high expectations for this one. However, I believe that is actually mostly glass at street level. But the building will sit on a sliver of a corner that's protected on the rest of the block for historic reasons, so the effect (IMO) is that it's kind of left out in the cold on a very cold corner of DT. The opposite corners have the Bellsouth, One Nashville, and a 1940s midrise. The Bellsouth is not street level friendly, and One Nashville turns away from this corner (in favor of the northwest corner on 4th Ave). So it's not surprising that there hasn't been a whole lot of excitement for this one.
A good thing about it is that it will be fairly attractive infill. If you want pedestrian friendly, you'll have to go to Church and Sobro (unless they decide to stick that completely unfriendly Convention Center there). But Sobro has a great start.
#49
Posted 09 June 2006 - 05:35 PM
#50
Posted 10 June 2006 - 03:17 PM
PHofKS, on May 13 2006, 01:13 AM, said:
Here are some proposed towers from around the country that are of styles that some may like for our skyline. What do you think?

If I could pluck any building I wanted and stick it in Nashville it would be Atlanta's 191 Peachtree Building.
http://www.emporis.c...3/07/206986.jpg
http://www.emporis.c...4/01/239133.jpg
At 770 feet it would complement a thousand footer nicely.
#51
Posted 11 June 2006 - 11:54 AM
nashvol85, on Jun 10 2006, 05:17 PM, said:
With all due respect, I think 191 PT is hideous. It does have nice height. But puhhleeaze... that double cupola is just idiotic looking (IMO of course).
#52
Posted 11 June 2006 - 01:01 PM
#53
Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:41 PM
Westin
Crown
Sliver
Giarratana's Kenner project adjacent to his Belle Meade plaza
Velocity
Rhythm
Neuhoff
Edited by ATLBrain, 28 August 2006 - 08:42 PM.
#54
Posted 27 September 2006 - 07:51 AM
Condos changing face of West End
It has a graphic of the condo projects currently under construction or about to be in the West End Park area...it also contains a rendering of the Park 30 project which I hadn't seen.
#55
Posted 03 October 2006 - 03:33 AM
#56
Posted 03 October 2006 - 03:17 PM
#57
Posted 08 October 2006 - 05:04 PM


Its approval has been delayed 3 months:
http://www.tennessea.../608140326/1003
The building would go up diagonally to the crane in the bottom, across from the symphony center right beside Shelby St Pedestrian bridge as you can see it rises on that block.
Edited by heckles, 08 October 2006 - 05:23 PM.
#58
Posted 14 November 2006 - 05:58 PM
#59
Posted 03 January 2007 - 04:09 PM
#60
Posted 03 January 2007 - 05:05 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













