West
#21
Posted 27 April 2006 - 09:00 AM
I can't see any NIMBYs for this one. This should be rubber stamped.
The article is interesting, I'm wondering where the saturation point is, seems like in 2008 we'll have 100s of new condos. My only hope is their all filled. If they are, the ball will continue to roll. Hopefully other areas of DT will start getting major announcements like this.
#22
Posted 27 April 2006 - 12:18 PM
#23
Posted 27 April 2006 - 01:42 PM
ncsugrad204, on Apr 27 2006, 09:21 AM, said:
The NIMBY's are the ones that should be way out in the burbs...Let the true city folk reach for the sky. Its crazy to hear people say don't build high DT. Against the grain.
#24
Posted 27 April 2006 - 03:05 PM
#25
Posted 27 April 2006 - 03:06 PM
#26
Posted 27 April 2006 - 05:13 PM
This area use to be called "Smokey Hollow" because the coal/steam trains use to come through and it would leave smoke in the area. There were only houses there at the time.
Ijust hope the buildings have some character.
#27
Posted 27 April 2006 - 06:39 PM
Edited by bdp, 27 April 2006 - 06:40 PM.
#28
Posted 27 April 2006 - 06:54 PM
Eastwestrob, on Apr 27 2006, 02:42 PM, said:
#29
Posted 29 April 2006 - 09:48 PM
Edited by RaleighRick, 29 April 2006 - 09:52 PM.
#30
Posted 29 April 2006 - 10:04 PM
#32
Posted 30 April 2006 - 12:15 AM
#33
Posted 30 April 2006 - 10:38 AM
#34
Posted 30 April 2006 - 11:14 AM
#35
Posted 30 April 2006 - 12:04 PM
#36
Posted 30 April 2006 - 12:18 PM
#37
Posted 01 May 2006 - 06:12 AM
#38
Posted 01 May 2006 - 07:17 AM
Dividing the facade horizontally with small, repeating setbacks like that is a relatively new trend, and to me it smacks of McMansions and their hyper-numerous false dormers. In other words, an attempt to circumvent the need to make a well-proportioned building, by giving it a false sense of depth, and making an otherwise blank and boring flat space more visually interesting without adding any elements of design and architecture.
I think the actual architecture will look dated within a couple decades.
However, this building's urban form appears to be exemplary- and that alone will lend the building a timeless quality. Everything else is secondary.
#39
Posted 01 May 2006 - 07:31 AM
I personally think that it can create a "dated" look in time, but this may not be a bad thing. Take art-deco design for instance. Sure it is easy to date a building by looking at its style, but it still look good as hell. Same for the Mutual Life building in Durham. Its design is very dated, but I still think it looks cool. It certainly adds to diversity over time. The more I look at Boylan Flats, the more I applaud the fact that they are breaking the mold. It certainly is a fine line and currently, I am fine with this style of architecture. However, if the next 10 proposals for downtown Raleigh look similar, then I might experience boredom.
Edited by avery, 01 May 2006 - 09:09 AM.
#40
Posted 01 May 2006 - 08:41 AM
I would also like to know what other materials can be used aside from Brick, Glass, Stone and EIFS? I've heard complaints about the over use of Brick or EIFS but can't recall options.
-Thanks in advance!
--T
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













