Major James Center Expansion
#181
Posted 03 April 2008 - 09:06 AM
Is the current owner the same as the James Center?
#184
Posted 03 April 2008 - 06:28 PM
If I'm not mistaken, I think I read that the parcel is for sale at or over $3 million. I've heard a tenant from the doomed triangle block tower was interested but it was more of a rumor than anything I think...
#185
Posted 04 April 2008 - 07:40 AM
#186
Posted 04 April 2008 - 08:52 AM
The parcel which supposedly has air rights is just southwest of the main development parcel and has RMA ownership since it is part of the RMA Parking Deck.
I don't know how up to date this is but:
http://www.thalhimer...;transType=Sale
Edited by wrldcoupe4, 04 April 2008 - 08:52 AM.
#187
Posted 09 April 2008 - 08:38 PM
Shakman, on Apr 3 2008, 10:06 AM, said:
Is the current owner the same as the James Center?
GREAT NEWS!!! As I was leaving work today I saw an "under contract" sticker across the Thalhimer's For Sale sign on this lot. I hope we'll hear something soon.
#188
Posted 09 April 2008 - 09:16 PM
#189
Posted 10 April 2008 - 06:24 AM
#190
Posted 10 April 2008 - 07:59 AM
Shakman, on Apr 10 2008, 07:24 AM, said:
It seems awfully small for a significant office building, to be honest. Is there any hint of what type of structure is being planned for that site? I wouldn't mind seeing some street-level retail regardless of what gets built.
#191
Posted 10 April 2008 - 08:13 AM
The surface parcel is over 17k square feet. If you throw in the portion of the RMA deck with air rights, it's not as small as it appears. Depending on what you mean by significant, a 15-20 story office tower there would look pretty good. It isn't really the kind of site where you would see a signature tower or anything though.
#192
Posted 10 April 2008 - 08:16 AM
jbjust, on Apr 10 2008, 09:59 AM, said:
The RMA garage, to my understanding, has air rights. To verify this, I went to the top of the RMA garage and discovered concrete capped columns...
Of course this could also be an indication that the garage has the ability to expand vertically.
Maybe so or both of the above. I guess we have to wait and see...
Edited by Shakman, 10 April 2008 - 08:17 AM.
#195
Posted 10 April 2008 - 06:35 PM
#196
Posted 10 April 2008 - 08:21 PM
I imagine CommRE can "comment further" if and when this closes.
#197
Posted 21 January 2012 - 02:11 PM
#198
Posted 22 January 2012 - 12:56 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













