What is the best zoo in Tennessee?
#1
Posted 03 May 2006 - 03:15 PM
#2
Posted 03 May 2006 - 05:47 PM
#3
Posted 03 May 2006 - 05:51 PM
Right now, I'll say Memphis.
Nashville's does have interesting long-term potential because of the amount of land, though.
#4
Posted 03 May 2006 - 06:48 PM
#5
Posted 04 May 2006 - 12:40 PM
soverbey, on May 3 2006, 05:15 PM, said:
Yes, Chattanooga has a small one. It has come a long way since the '80s though.
#6
Posted 05 May 2006 - 01:35 PM
#7
Posted 05 May 2006 - 02:04 PM
#8
Posted 07 May 2006 - 10:22 PM
#9
Posted 08 May 2006 - 11:18 PM
#10
Posted 09 May 2006 - 08:38 AM
It's so landlocked though (even though the master plan shows room for expansion). I'd like to see them spin off the aquarium and aviary into another location/attraction, like the Audubon zoo. Except for that, where do you go? Into the parking lots?
The improvements aren't stopping with NW Passage either. The Zoo recently announced plans for Teton Trek.
#11
Posted 09 May 2006 - 11:31 AM
I've only been to Zoo Atlanta. My wife has been to the one in Memphis and Nashville as well as Atlanta. She says Memphis and Atlanta are more comparable as Nashville did get a late start (actually, they had a zoo west of town, but Grassmere is fairly new.
I would say Memphis is probably better (just guessing since I personally have never been), but I would agree that Nashville's zoo has the most potential. The concept here isn't caged animals, but an attempt to replicate these animals natural habitats. Since they are just now getting Giraffe's, I have no idea how long it will take this zoo to grow, but with the other growth in the area, I would say in 10-20 years, Nashville should have one of the premier zoo's in the country.
#12
Posted 09 May 2006 - 01:18 PM
rocky top buzz, on May 9 2006, 12:31 PM, said:
I've only been to Zoo Atlanta. My wife has been to the one in Memphis and Nashville as well as Atlanta. She says Memphis and Atlanta are more comparable as Nashville did get a late start (actually, they had a zoo west of town, but Grassmere is fairly new.
I would say Memphis is probably better (just guessing since I personally have never been), but I would agree that Nashville's zoo has the most potential. The concept here isn't caged animals, but an attempt to replicate these animals natural habitats. Since they are just now getting Giraffe's, I have no idea how long it will take this zoo to grow, but with the other growth in the area, I would say in 10-20 years, Nashville should have one of the premier zoo's in the country.
- The concept at the Memphis Zoo is not one of caged animals either, however the last time I went to the Nashville Zoo it seemed to be. The new polar bear exhibit is one of the best natural habitat formats for a zoo that i have ever seen...quite impressive
#13
Posted 09 May 2006 - 09:53 PM
#14
Posted 10 May 2006 - 11:13 AM
rocky top buzz, on May 9 2006, 01:31 PM, said:
#15
Posted 11 May 2006 - 07:36 AM
#16
Posted 13 May 2006 - 12:19 PM
rocky top buzz, on May 9 2006, 12:31 PM, said:
I've only been to Zoo Atlanta. My wife has been to the one in Memphis and Nashville as well as Atlanta. She says Memphis and Atlanta are more comparable as Nashville did get a late start (actually, they had a zoo west of town, but Grassmere is fairly new.
I would say Memphis is probably better (just guessing since I personally have never been), but I would agree that Nashville's zoo has the most potential. The concept here isn't caged animals, but an attempt to replicate these animals natural habitats. Since they are just now getting Giraffe's, I have no idea how long it will take this zoo to grow, but with the other growth in the area, I would say in 10-20 years, Nashville should have one of the premier zoo's in the country.
San Diego, St. Louis, Omaha aren't in the South. I wasn't clear that the only cities I was mentioning were those in the South. [edit: i.e. Memphis ranking behind maybe Atlanta and Audobon in the South, but beyond the South, maybe ranking behind others which I didn't venture to mention]. That's my bad. There are so many great zoos in the country. National Zoo isn't bad either. SD and StL are pretty vast also, if I remember correctly. Don't remember Omaha or National Zoo.
I'd like to see Memphis go the route of Audubon, and try to use nearby facilities for satellite exhibits (i.e. Aquarium or aviary in a nearby structure at Overton Park). I would never want it to have to move from its present location. Quality, not quantity baby.
Edited by Clobber, 13 May 2006 - 12:25 PM.
#17
Posted 19 June 2006 - 11:19 AM
#18
Posted 19 June 2006 - 08:46 PM
Chattanooga Zoo
#19
Posted 21 June 2006 - 07:50 AM
#20
Posted 29 June 2006 - 11:51 AM
franktown, on Jun 19 2006, 12:19 PM, said:
Since I'm not a resident of Tennessee I may not know the whole story, but from what I know it had something to the merger of the Grassmere foundation with the original Nashville Zoo society. Also from what I know they wanted the zoo closer to Nashville's DT but with space to grow.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













