Historic Intown Neighborhoods
#1
Posted 08 May 2006 - 12:19 PM
First up is an aritcle in today'y paper about Carlisle Street's rennovation plants.
http://www.goupstate.../605080337/1051
Over the next 18 months, 6 homes will be rennovated.
"Funding comes from the federal HOME program, administered by the city, as well as a line of credit from the Palmetto Bank and $200,000 from the National Trust for Historic Preservation that can only be used to remodel homes that are pre-sold."
The work is being organized by the Preservation Trust of Spartanburg.
I think this is an important step in the Hamoton Heights revitalization process.
#2
Posted 08 May 2006 - 12:32 PM
I think that it should not be closed. I am generally not in favor of removing street connections like that. If you want a cul-de-sac, then there are plenty of subdivisions to choose from.
Here is a map. You can't really see the barriers here, or if you zoom in. But for those of you that are unfamiliar with the area, the barriers are at the intersection with S. Daniel Morgan Ave, so without the barriers, the road has the potential to become a cut-through again. I would rather see the interseciton reworked so that its not easy to drive through, but so residents won't be cut off from the road either.
Here is the article.
#3
Posted 25 September 2006 - 11:47 AM
#4
Posted 25 September 2006 - 01:52 PM
It is also great to see that they may start targeting the Beaumont Mills and Spartan Mills areas also.
#5
Posted 25 September 2006 - 03:26 PM
hub-city, on Sep 25 2006, 03:52 PM, said:
It is also great to see that they may start targeting the Beaumont Mills and Spartan Mills areas also.
Besides Spartan Mills and Beaumont two other close in neighborhoods deserve attention too. Park Hills and Cleveland Park have mostly good housing stock and are convenient to downtown.
#6
Posted 25 September 2006 - 09:31 PM
roads-scholar, on Sep 25 2006, 05:26 PM, said:
Here are two articles about Hampton Heights today.
Relocation
Changing a perception
I enjoyed both, because each highlights the positive changes that are occuring in that neighborhood. I hope the Arts Center is converted into condos of some sort. That would be a good re-use for that property.
I also like the idea of other in town neighborhoods being redevloped. Lets not forget about North Dean.
I think that Park Hills will be the most difficult to fix up because of its distance from downtown. Its a little too far to walk at this point, and its proximity to other less desirable parts of town is more obvious there. It will be necessary to revitalize Reidville Rd from W Main to the Beacon to at least help improve the look of the area.
I personally think that the East Peal neighborhood between Wofford and Regional would be an attracive neighborhood for professors, doctors, etc. from these two institutions.
I am personally a fan of re-establishing Hamburg Heights as an identifiable neighborhood. We have a thread about this neighborhood in the forum.
I have heard that they are looking to reinvest in Beaumont Mills, but this is the first that I have heard of a reinvestment in Spartan Mills. Where did you hear about that, and can you provide any other information?
#7
Posted 01 October 2006 - 07:15 PM
On the map, it is adjacent to Summerhill, which I have been through more often... so I assumed, incorrectly, that it was similar.
I made it a point to go down Victoria Rd, which was quite nice. It actually felt like Converse Heights until I got to the bottom of the hill. If they could extend that feel into the rest of the neighborhood, I think Park Hills could be a nice neighborhood. The rest of the neighborhood is not quite as nice, but it shows a lot of promise. I hope that the City will focus on this neighborhood after Hampton Heights.
#8
Posted 24 October 2006 - 08:36 PM
Regarding Hampton Heights, I must admit that I cannot be MORE thrilled with our progress over the past couple of years. The revitalization of downtown is really paying off for us. Then the Preservation Trust and especially their Carlisle Street Project. AND the downtown master plan. I went to 4 sessions and each time HH was brought up as one neighborhood already benefitting from the revitilization.
A few weeks ago, when Wofford had their homecoming, they had a downtown street party on Friday night. I walked out on my front porch and could literally hear downtown bustling.
It made my weekend.
#9
Posted 09 December 2006 - 12:07 PM
A recent article in the LINK hints that Beamont Mills may be the next focus area for the Preservation Trust, which has made great strides at bringing back Hampton Heights.
Also- I think that the North Dean neighborhood could see more attention in the coming years if the Master Plan is taken seriously.
#10
Posted 13 February 2007 - 08:39 AM
"City Council voted unanimously to commit $17,500, taken from hospitality tax funds, in matching funds toward a Community Development Block Grant that will be a "spot of pride," or green space on Carlisle Street, near the intersection of Daniel Morgan Avenue."
This will be a great improvement over the jersey barriers that are there now. Definitely good news for Hampton Heights!
Article
#11
Posted 23 March 2007 - 08:49 PM
Wofford hasn't said anything, but IMO it looks like they are going to build some more dorms in this area. If you look at a map, you can clearly see the small neighborhood between their campus and Regional. That map on Google reflects how it used to be. This neighborhood is being squeezed on both ends, and I think that it is doomed to die if college students, professors, doctors, and nurses cannot gentrify and revive this neighborhood.
#12
Posted 24 April 2007 - 06:56 AM
This is the latest: "In other business, council voted unanimously on second and final reading to rezone portions of East Pearl Street, Edgewood Avenue, Thomas Street and McDowell Street from general residential district to general institutional district, as requested by Wofford College. If the college builds on this property, the correct zoning would be general institutional district."
Here is a map. You cen see that McDowell, Edgewood, Jefferson, and Thomas are the streets with the most houses remaining. Everything from Evins St to Dewey St was essentially filled with these houses- (early 20th century bungalows). You can clearly see where Regional and Wofford are expending into this area.
This is a far cry from being a vibrant neighborhood anymore, but I'd like to think it could be preserved to some extent, at least in form if nothing else.
Article
#13
Posted 18 October 2007 - 11:00 AM
Read more at this link.
Other Spartanburg County historic districts include:
- Converse College Historic District
- Glenn Springs Historic District
- Hampton Heights Historic District
- Hurricane Tavern (aka: Workman Farm) [this one is in Woodruff]
- Spartanburg Historic District [historic part of the CBD]
- Wofford College Historic District
http://www.nationalr...oricplaces.com/
#14
Posted 23 October 2007 - 09:05 AM
We have an update on Carrington in the HJ today:
Council approved final reading on an ordinance that rezones the 15 acres off Woodburn Road for the Carrington development. The plan is still for 40 new houses. The area will be rezoned from R 15 single-family residential to R-8 planned development district to allow for flexibility for smaller lots and rear alleyways."
Council Meeting Article
The real alley ways is probably the most exciting news. That means that these houses won't have front-loaded garages. It will be more "traditional" with garages in the back, if at all. This is sounding like it will be a great project for Spartanburg.
#15
Posted 08 February 2008 - 03:59 PM
This location will be GREAT for families looking to make the move to Hampton Heights. The current school options for HH are not good, and this will give parents in that neighborhood (and others) a better option for schooling. This is great news for Spartanburg and all of its intown neighborhoods.
#17
Posted 08 February 2008 - 07:19 PM
#18
Posted 08 February 2008 - 09:19 PM
Spartan, on Feb 8 2008, 09:19 PM, said:
I think you're thinking of Evans which was the predecessor of SHS. I guess anything is possible, but I wouldn't have thought District 7 would have had enough students for more than 2 high schools then.
#19
Posted 08 February 2008 - 10:02 PM
It wasn't a "District 7" issue, as I think the 1930s predates our current district set up by several decades. Maybe it was the old Carver HS (the former black high school)?
I'll have to do some research on this one. I just don't know much about that building.
#20
Posted 08 February 2008 - 10:59 PM
Spartan, on Feb 9 2008, 12:02 AM, said:
Carver High School was torn down, and Carver Junior High was built in its place at the same site.
According to the Little Theatre History, Jenkins was a junior high in the mid-40's. It's possible that that's incorrect, but when I was at Evan and then SHS in the 60's, I don't remember ever hearing that Jenkins or Cleveland had ever been anything other than junior high schools. I Google'd and found an old postcard from the 40's on eBay for Cleveland, but nothing turned up for Jenkins. Sorry not to be more help.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













