Jump to content


- - - - -

Station Nightclub Fire - Trials


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#1 Dan

Dan

    Hamlet

  • Validating
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:Providence, RI | Mount Pleasant

Posted 10 May 2006 - 04:21 PM

Biechele gets 4 years to serve

This man was the stage manager for the 80's rock band Great White, which was authorized to put on the pyrotechnics display by Jeffrey and Michael Derderian, who booked the act and owned the club.
He lit the fuse, and he's going away until at least 2010.

Is this a fair sentence?  Do you believe this man bears the brunt of the responsibility for the fire?

What kind of sentence would you like to see imposed on the club owners, who brought in this act in the first place and whose building was outfitted with highly-flammable sound proofing near the stage?


 

#2 Frankie811

Frankie811

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,747 posts
  • Location:Riverside, RI

Posted 10 May 2006 - 05:33 PM

Well, to be honest with you, I'm ashamed to say that I'm really tired of hearing about the whole thing over and over again. I didn't lose anybody in this tragedy, but I do know people who did. Several in fact. One of my coworkers actually canceled going at the last minute and knew many of the regulars there.  What bothers me greatly is the anger that many of the families still hold. They seem to want blood from the defendants. Why can't they just let go? Nobody wanted this. It was an accident. But it was a horrible way to die.

#3 Dan

Dan

    Hamlet

  • Validating
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:Providence, RI | Mount Pleasant

Posted 11 May 2006 - 04:49 AM

4 year term for man who set R.I. fire angers families

USA Today

#4 matt

matt

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 698 posts
  • Location:Providence - Elmhurst

Posted 11 May 2006 - 05:32 AM

I agree with Frankie on this.  This tragedy was really close to me as well.  The only thing this guy is guilty of is making a stupid decision, and he accepted responsibility for this.  I believe he is the only one who has accepted responsibility.  

I believe if he expected people to get hurt, he would have not made the choice he did.  Should he be punished, absolutely, but so should:
the club owners for foolishly lining the club, and any authorities who inpected the club and allowed it to stay open.  

The families do seem to be digging into this guy.  He didn't murder anybody, he made a stupid mistake.  

This should never have happened.

#5 runawayjim

runawayjim

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,059 posts
  • Location:Providence - Elmhurst

Posted 11 May 2006 - 11:51 AM

i, too, am really annoyed by these families.  even the families of the 9/11 victims aren't calling for as much blood as these families are.  they're both tragedies that never should have happened, but the difference is the station was an accident.  sure, it could have been prevented.  the fire marshall is probably the guy they should be going after if anyone.

but it's been 3 years, i think it's time to move on.

#6 jencoleslaw

jencoleslaw

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,834 posts
  • Location:NoVA via PVD

Posted 11 May 2006 - 05:58 PM

i am sorry the families are still holding on to all that anger. having never lost anyone like that (although i did lose a college buddy--dr. metal, in the fire, as well as being college classmates with Jeff Derdarian) i can't say whether i'd be reacting the same way. But as someone who is a stickler for fairness, i cannot for the life of me understand why the West Warwick fire chief was not held at all accountable for that fire.

#7 Frankie811

Frankie811

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,747 posts
  • Location:Riverside, RI

Posted 11 May 2006 - 06:51 PM

I work with the Dederians brother Bob, and I never know what to say to him. If they were to hold a benefit dinner for them to raise money for legal fees I'd probrbly buy one. I just can't get it out of my head the way Jeff Dederian broke down and cried at the news conference held @ the Crowne Plaza in Warwick.

#8 Dan

Dan

    Hamlet

  • Validating
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:Providence, RI | Mount Pleasant

Posted 12 May 2006 - 02:07 PM

View PostFrankie811, on May 11 2006, 08:51 PM, said:

I just can't get it out of my head the way Jeff Dederian broke down and cried at the news conference held @ the Crowne Plaza in Warwick.

I'm sure you saw the way this man broke down... he wrote 100 apology letters!  He was railroaded into being a scapegoat.  He got screwed!  

If you're gonna put this guy away for 4 years, the Derderian's should get 25 to life.  It just blows my mind that the WWRI fire marshall gave everybody the slip.

#9 jencoleslaw

jencoleslaw

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,834 posts
  • Location:NoVA via PVD

Posted 12 May 2006 - 02:36 PM

View PostDan, on May 12 2006, 04:07 PM, said:

If you're gonna put this guy away for 4 years, the Derderian's should get 25 to life.  It just blows my mind that the WWRI fire marshall gave everybody the slip.
i wonder if family members can sue him in civil court since no one seems interested in getting him on a criminal charge.  What really pisses me off is that WW allowed this guy to retire so he could get his full pension.

#10 SBCmetroguy

SBCmetroguy

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 7,781 posts
  • Location:Northwest Louisiana

Posted 12 May 2006 - 02:51 PM

View PostDan, on May 10 2006, 05:21 PM, said:

Biechele gets 4 years to serve

This man was the stage manager for the 80's rock band Great White, which was authorized to put on the pyrotechnics display by Jeffrey and Michael Derderian, who booked the act and owned the club.
He lit the fuse, and he's going away until at least 2010.

Is this a fair sentence?  Do you believe this man bears the brunt of the responsibility for the fire?

What kind of sentence would you like to see imposed on the club owners, who brought in this act in the first place and whose building was outfitted with highly-flammable sound proofing near the stage?

If the owner of the club authorized the pyrotechnics, then he should be the one in trouble.

#11 Frankie811

Frankie811

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,747 posts
  • Location:Riverside, RI

Posted 12 May 2006 - 02:53 PM

View PostSBCmetroguy, on May 12 2006, 03:51 PM, said:

If the owner of the club authorized the pyrotechnics, then he should be the one in trouble.
Well that's just it. Did they!!?????????? They say NO!

#12 SBCmetroguy

SBCmetroguy

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 7,781 posts
  • Location:Northwest Louisiana

Posted 12 May 2006 - 02:57 PM

View PostFrankie811, on May 12 2006, 03:53 PM, said:

Well that's just it. Did they!!?????????? They say NO!

Sorry, I guess being from another area I only knew half the story.

Either way, they own the club and should be held fully responsible for whatever happens in there within their control. They had to know there would be pyrotechnics, so why not shut the show down if they knew that? They most definitely should shoulder the blame here.

#13 runawayjim

runawayjim

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,059 posts
  • Location:Providence - Elmhurst

Posted 12 May 2006 - 03:12 PM

View PostSBCmetroguy, on May 12 2006, 04:57 PM, said:

Sorry, I guess being from another area I only knew half the story.

Either way, they own the club and should be held fully responsible for whatever happens in there within their control. They had to know there would be pyrotechnics, so why not shut the show down if they knew that? They most definitely should shoulder the blame here.

if the fire marshall didn't say they weren't allowed to have pyro there... why should they believe otherwise?  the fire marshall said it met code, i think he's the one who should be held responsible.  for instance, electrical stuff can easily start a fire.  they say once a spark hit the sound proofing, it went up instantly... an electrical fire on stage could have easily done the same thing.

#14 matt

matt

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 698 posts
  • Location:Providence - Elmhurst

Posted 13 May 2006 - 05:49 AM

View Postrunawayjim, on May 12 2006, 05:12 PM, said:

an electrical fire on stage could have easily done the same thing.


Very good point.

#15 jencoleslaw

jencoleslaw

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,834 posts
  • Location:NoVA via PVD

Posted 13 May 2006 - 08:17 AM

View Postrunawayjim, on May 12 2006, 05:12 PM, said:

if the fire marshall didn't say they weren't allowed to have pyro there... why should they believe otherwise?  the fire marshall said it met code, i think he's the one who should be held responsible.  for instance, electrical stuff can easily start a fire.  they say once a spark hit the sound proofing, it went up instantly... an electrical fire on stage could have easily done the same thing.
or a cigarette. I mean, i'm all for everyone taking their share of responsibility in this incredibly awful tragedy, but the city of west warwick needed to offer up the fire marshall. How that man sleeps at night is beyond me.

#16 Dan

Dan

    Hamlet

  • Validating
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 518 posts
  • Location:Providence, RI | Mount Pleasant

Posted 13 May 2006 - 02:22 PM

View PostFrankie811, on May 12 2006, 04:53 PM, said:

Well that's just it. Did they!!?????????? They say NO!

C'mon Frankie, we all know that they bought that highly-flammable foam to act as sound proofing on the cheap, and Great White had always put on these types of displays when they performed in other cities.  Did you expect Mr. Pine to advise them to be truthful at the press conference?  He's their lawyer!

Jim and Jen are right, the fire could've been started with much less than the pyro-display, this being before the R.I. statewide smoking ban took effect.

#17 runawayjim

runawayjim

    Metropolitan Area

  • Members+
  • 8,059 posts
  • Location:Providence - Elmhurst

Posted 13 May 2006 - 02:29 PM

View PostDan, on May 13 2006, 04:22 PM, said:

C'mon Frankie, we all know that they bought that highly-flammable foam to act as sound proofing on the cheap, and Great White had always put on these types of displays when they performed in other cities.  Did you expect Mr. Pine to advise them to be truthful at the press conference?  He's their lawyer!

Jim and Jen are right, the fire could've been started with much less than the pyro-display, this being before the R.I. statewide smoking ban took effect.

they used cheap flammable sound proofing, but they also got the blessing of the fire marshall... if they didn't meet fire code, they couldn't have stayed open and wouldn't have used that stuff.  the only person i think anyone should be going after (regardless of who gave permission to use pyro) is the fire marshall, but he's not even being looked at.

but i still say the families need to just give it up and move on with their lives.  it was an accident, and that's really what it comes down to.

#18 jencoleslaw

jencoleslaw

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,834 posts
  • Location:NoVA via PVD

Posted 13 May 2006 - 05:08 PM

they also say that the salesperson who sold them the stuff said that it was safe. There's enough blame to go around and i would like it to go around if possible. Any news on whether there will be any kind of civil suit? I suppose families are waiting to see how all the criminal cases end up. But if i lost someone i loved in that fire you bet your  sweet asspercreme i would be sending a constable to the fire marshall's house with a summons for a civil suit.

#19 KRC

KRC

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 462 posts

Posted 15 May 2006 - 10:32 AM

View Postrunawayjim, on May 13 2006, 04:29 PM, said:

but i still say the families need to just give it up and move on with their lives.  it was an accident, and that's really what it comes down to.
Careful.  I understand where you are coming from with that, but it's not that easy for some.  I lost my best friend that night.  I still have difficulty driving by the site.  What's my biggest problem?  I know how she died, I know she suffered, I know she saw it coming, I know she died terrified, then she burned to death...and I wasn't there to help.  You only need to see the video taken from inside once to remember the sounds of people screaming in agony.  I hurt, my friend.  It will go away over time.  But this is a horrible, horrible thing to live with.  All most have is selected opportunities to vent.

#20 Frankie811

Frankie811

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,747 posts
  • Location:Riverside, RI

Posted 15 May 2006 - 01:49 PM

View PostKRC, on May 15 2006, 11:32 AM, said:

Careful.  I understand where you are coming from with that, but it's not that easy for some.  I lost my best friend that night.  I still have difficulty driving by the site.  What's my biggest problem?  I know how she died, I know she suffered, I know she saw it coming, I know she died terrified, then she burned to death...and I wasn't there to help.  You only need to see the video taken from inside once to remember the sounds of people screaming in agony.  I hurt, my friend.  It will go away over time.  But this is a horrible, horrible thing to live with.  All most have is selected opportunities to vent.
I have NO IDEA of what you're going through, but I do hope that you can find a way to fight through it. Be strong. And always, always remember the GOOD TIMES that you both had.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users