Discussion: Birmingham's Progress and Sustainability
#41
Posted 18 March 2007 - 04:45 PM
Unfortunately, most of the metro residents don't seem to care. MAPS was voted down in the 90's and tens of millions of federal dollars were left on the table recently when area leaders couldn't come up with matching money. Senator Shelby was right to be livid over that one.
As the article posted previously clearly states, good leadership is desperately needed. A good leader could sell some of these ideas to a skeptical public.
I sincerely hope that Birmingham can find that kind of leadership, and soon.
#42
Posted 22 March 2007 - 08:34 AM
But some encouraging news came out today. Jefferson County, by Census estimates, is no longer losing population. That's a welcome shot of encouraging news that I've been trying to tell people all along. You need only drive around a few minutes in this county to know that we're not losing folks at an alarming rate. Moreover, ALL SEVEN COUNTIES in Greater Birmingham saw population gains. From July 2005 to July 2006, Greater Birmingham grew by nearly 12,000. Today, the population of Greater Birmingham MSA is 1,101,127. The Greater Birmingham CSA is up around 1.2 million.
#43
Posted 22 March 2007 - 12:15 PM
#44
Posted 22 March 2007 - 12:18 PM
ExpatBaman, on Mar 18 2007, 05:45 PM, said:
Unfortunately, most of the metro residents don't seem to care. MAPS was voted down in the 90's and tens of millions of federal dollars were left on the table recently when area leaders couldn't come up with matching money. Senator Shelby was right to be livid over that one.
As the article posted previously clearly states, good leadership is desperately needed. A good leader could sell some of these ideas to a skeptical public.
I sincerely hope that Birmingham can find that kind of leadership, and soon.
I hope and pray that secure long-term local match to that $87 million is found, so that BJCTA can grow and evolve into a TRUE regional mass transit system. I am still staying optimistic that the BJCTA will evolve into the BARTA (Birmingham Area Rapid Transit Authority) system that has been proposed by the RPC since the MAPS plan in '98.
#45
Posted 02 April 2007 - 09:57 AM
#46
Posted 02 April 2007 - 10:40 AM
Blazer85, on Apr 2 2007, 10:57 AM, said:
I've been saying this for the longest. Birmingham isn't just the city of Birmingham, but rather all the cities in its urban area. There has been some much strife and isolationism of this metro area that it is bascially stick in "neutral", it's not really growing nor is it shrinking. That is what has turned off some many of our best educated and brightest in this region to leave either after college or when offered a job in their career field in another city. There was a story in the Birmingham Business Journal how some many within the 18-34 demographic with the most potential to be successful have opted to leave the area for a smaller salary in places like Atlanta, Nashville, and Charlotte becuase of this. We need to clean house and vote out every incumbent that shows that they don't care to change this status quo. I don't want Greater Birmingham to be possess out of control growth, but I don't want this current trend to continue. Shelby County growth is good, but most of it is as John Archibald said (click here) we are basically just the reshruffling of the population from one area to another without any real out-of-state residents moving to the region like other cities including Huntsville. It is embarrassing that we are the slowest growing metropolitan area in the entire Southern United States because of our region's poor leadership and lack of regional cooperation.
#47
Posted 04 April 2007 - 02:35 AM
in short, i agree, blazer.
#48
Posted 05 April 2007 - 10:20 AM
Area's population growth trails
The numbers show that the Greater Birmingham area has only gain a net growth of 50K inhabitants in the past 6 years with 4.6% growth rate. This is compared to Huntsville-Decatur, who has kept up with the South's other much larger cities in percentage of growth at <10%.
Quote
Ball said the metro area needs to develop public transportation, reduce the dropout rate and make other improvements in public schools. He said the state and region need to invest more in the University of Alabama at Birmingham in ways that foster jobs in technology and research.
"UAB has still not reached its potential."
--Charles Ball, Executive Director of the Greater Birmingham Regional Planning Commission
This type of news aggrevates me because people like the 3 Stooges on the Jeffco Commission are always trying to factionalize this region with their partisan BS. In addition, Kincaid and a******s like Miriam Witherspoon, Steve Hoyt, Roderick Royal are in City Hall killing every progressive idea for this place because their ignorance and selfishness. It bothers me how Birmingham is constantly missing out on so many good things because of its poor leadership.
There is also one thing that I keep hearing conflicting reports on is the Jeffco population between 2000-06. From the state estimates, Jeffco has grown, but from the US Census Bureau has lost ppl.
#49
Posted 05 April 2007 - 11:18 AM
Leonard23, on Apr 5 2007, 10:20 AM, said:
Area's population growth trails
The numbers show that the Greater Birmingham area has only gain a net growth of 50K inhabitants in the past 6 years with 4.6% growth rate. This is compared to Huntsville-Decatur, who has kept up with the South's other much larger cities in percentage of growth at <10%.
This type of news aggrevates me because people like the 3 Stooges on the Jeffco Commission are always trying to factionalize this region with their partisan BS. In addition, Kincaid and a******s like Miriam Witherspoon, Steve Hoyt, Roderick Royal are in City Hall killing every progressive idea for this place because their ignorance and selfishness. It bothers me how Birmingham is constantly missing out on so many good things because of its poor leadership.
There is also one thing that I keep hearing conflicting reports on is the Jeffco population between 2000-06. From the state estimates, Jeffco has grown, but from the US Census Bureau has lost ppl.
Are you certain? What I thought was that they said we've still lost population from 2000 to 2006... but that from 2005 to 2006, we've gained. No matter the case, there are a LOT of signs that the area is really beginning to grow... in spite of incompetent leadership.
#50
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:58 AM
Blazer85, on Apr 5 2007, 12:18 PM, said:
Blazer85, so you are saying that Jeffco gain between '05-'06, then that is good.
The articles of the lost of population for Jeffco was both in this article and an article in the Birmingham Business Journal in the past 2 weeks.
Back to the topic, I am just concerned about how Greater Birmingham is growing so slow that if it were growing any slower then it would be shrinking. We are almost in the same situation that the Hampton Roads (in Virginia) was in where there was practically zero growth just more births than deaths occuring in the region.
#51
Posted 16 April 2007 - 01:35 PM
If we can do what we've done with pathetic leadership, who knows what kind of growth could be in store if we had just remotely intelligent leaders in our local government.
#52
Posted 22 April 2007 - 09:10 PM
I think this is a fairly significant development in terms of the overall process of converting downtown into a more family-friendly environment. Officials hope that by moving the Jimmie Hale Mission out of the central downtown area that fewer homeless people will make be hanging around the central downtown area.
I'm all for trying to rehabilitate folks and think the Jimmie Hale Mission is a great service to our community, but I'm glad they've moved it out of the central downtown area. While many homeless people are fairly helpless and just looking to get by, homeless folks frighten off a lot of downtown visitors... particuarly if they're not used to interacting with the homeless.
#53
Posted 24 April 2007 - 09:26 PM
#54
Posted 24 April 2007 - 09:57 PM
Skyscrapers aren't the be-all, end-all, but it's all about perception. Skyscrapers, right or wrong, are considered a gauge of a downtown's health. We all know that doesn't have to be the case. But this is why alot of folks not familiar with Birmingham may think Birmingham is stagnant or sinking further. This is because skyscrapers are the most visible signs of progress, and really, not much has changed in years. It's only when you look at all the loft/condo conversions, new restaurants, new hotels, etc. that you really see what's going on downtown.
All that to say this...
1) We're missing a 30+ story skyscraper
2) We're missing a significant expansion of the BJCC
3) We're missing a significant committment to expanding mass transit (downtown especially)
4) We're missing the Railroad Reservation Park
Any or all of these will really help signal us being over the tipping point. Personally I think we're kind of already at that point or just over, but any of those 4 would be REALLY significant in helping solidly push us over that tipping point.
#55
Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:08 PM
Blazer85, on Apr 24 2007, 10:57 PM, said:
2) We're missing a significant expansion of the BJCC
3) We're missing a significant committment to expanding mass transit (downtown especially)
4) We're missing the Railroad Reservation Park
Any or all of these will really help signal us being over the tipping point. Personally I think we're kind of already at that point or just over, but any of those 4 would be REALLY significant in helping solidly push us over that tipping point.
Not gonna comment on the first two, cause the city council is the one holding that back. They could get it done if they really wanted it. But, whatever happened to the Railroad Reservation Park??
#56
Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:13 PM
Alabadrock, on Apr 24 2007, 10:08 PM, said:
It's still a go... ground has already been broken, in fact. Real site work, however, is not expected to begin until very late this summer or maybe early fall. At least that's the last I heard.
#57
Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:17 PM
Blazer85, on Apr 24 2007, 11:13 PM, said:
Gooood. I was just wondering, cause, I hadn't heard ANYTHING in a long long time. And being soo far north, news about stuff like that doesn't come our way much. Thanx for the info!
#58
Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:52 PM
Leonard23, on Apr 24 2007, 09:26 PM, said:
Things that are needed or need to change:
Leadership in the mayor's office. Rather than wasting his time micro-managing the city's affairs the mayor needs competent people around so he can spend more time promoting the city and recruiting business and development.
Integrity and honesty in city hall. There is very little.
Cooperation between the mayor, city council and Jefferson County Commission. As I said in a previous post I believe the Jefferson County Commission and maybe some smaller city governments in this area want the city of Birmingham government to continue to fail.
Cooperation between the many municipalities in the area and especially their cooperation with the city of Birmingham. And yes, I believe much of the reason for the lack of cooperation from the county and suburbs with Birmingham is racially motivated and it needs to stop.
A stronger commitment by the cities, counties and state governments to the Birmingham International Airport.
Committment by the local governments to a real metro transit system.
#59
Posted 24 April 2007 - 11:15 PM
rolltider, on Apr 24 2007, 11:52 PM, said:
Leadership in the mayor's office. Rather than wasting his time micro-managing the city's affairs the mayor needs competent people around so he can spend more time promoting the city and recruiting business and development.
Integrity and honesty in city hall. There is very little.
Cooperation between the mayor, city council and Jefferson County Commission. As I said in a previous post I believe the Jefferson County Commission and maybe some smaller city governments in this area want the city of Birmingham government to continue to fail.
Cooperation between the many municipalities in the area and especially their cooperation with the city of Birmingham. And yes, I believe much of the reason for the lack of cooperation from the county and suburbs with Birmingham is racially motivated and it needs to stop.
A stronger commitment by the cities, counties and state governments to the Birmingham International Airport.
Committment by the local governments to a real metro transit system.
As I said in another thread, I'm getting sick and tired of watching this city rot to pieces, because their officials like doing what's best for themselves. The mayors and leaders of the cities of Atlanta, LA, NYC, Chic, and others, did NOT get to where they are without taking risks.
Good lord, don't be so safe! We like safe to a certain extent, but, improving the quality of life in your area and actually helping your people out, that takes something that safety CANNOT provide.
If I were in the government down there, I don't care, I'd do what's best for the city, not myself. I've never lived in Birmingham, but, I would love for it to be the most AMAZING city on earth, but, the leadership is stabbing the city in it's back by not allowing economic expansion to get a foothold.
#60
Posted 27 April 2007 - 12:34 AM
i'm happy with bham's current 'feel' - more impressive to the pedestrian than to the tower-gawkers on the interstate - and i think the wet dreams of scraper enthusiasts are decades away, if not longer, from being realized here - but there are signs that the stage is being set for growth on a larger scale. nothing bad about that, if it happens in the right way.
Edited by convulso, 27 April 2007 - 12:35 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













