MJLO, on Jun 6 2006, 09:12 PM, said:
I read today that they are having trouble garnering enough signatures for AZ's gay marriage amendment, One of the reasons cited, voter complacency.
This is a big misconception that, unfortunately, seems to be pretty common:
- Arizona already has a constitutional ammendment banning gay marriage
- The ammendment in question, that may or may not make the Nov ballot, is an ammendment to ban employment benefits (healthcare, retirement, etc) to unmarried partners
- This ammendment does not specify anything regarding homosexuality or gender (which itself is blatantly unconstitutional), so it will also ban benefits to unmarried heterosexual couples
I read that Len Munsil's group (Center for Arizona Policy) hired a firm to get the signatures, but the firm failed to offer his particular sheet to most people because the issue is so polarizing, and they didn't want to alienate people into walking away and not signing the other sheets. Now they're left essentially holding their proverbial dicks.
Please tell others, man, because, like I said, a lot of people think that this is actually an anti-gay marriage ammendment, which would receive much more support than what they're actually offering up. I really don't want to see this thing passed, especially as some sort of misdirected rallying point for the state's gay marriage opponents.
Arizona Together is the anti force on this. They're quite active in both Phoenix and Tucson. Get involved if you can.
BTW, why is that the AZ congressmen with the weird-ass names are the ones supporting Len Munsil (which is, itself, a pretty strange name) for governor: "Who's Supporting Len? Four U.S. Congressmen! The Honorable John Shadegg, The Honorable Rick Renzi, The Honorable Jeff Flake, The Honorable Trent Franks" (sorry to quote that, but I don't want to give Len a link on here)