This was bound to come up. I noticed that the CSAs of Houston and Atlanta are coming pretty close now. Will Atlanta pass Houston in size anytime soon or is the MSA a more accurate way to judge size?
Houston MSA 5,280,077 Land Area: 10,062sq mi
Houston CSA 5,380,661
Atlanta MSA 4,917,717 Land Area: ???
Atlanta CSA 5,249,121
What do you think? What gives a more accurate indication of a metro area's size? MSA or CSA?
My sources:
http://www.urbanplan...pic=23193&st=20
http://proximityone....etros.htm#top10
Houston vs. Atlanta
Started by
Greens!
, Jun 08 2006 06:10 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 08 June 2006 - 06:10 PM
#2
Posted 08 June 2006 - 11:58 PM
I prefer urbanized area figures myself. For instance, Gwinnett county is in Atlanta's MSA, but the eastern part of the county is barely developed and it certainly doesn't feel like you're in Atlanta's metro area just yet.
#3
Posted 08 March 2007 - 10:42 AM
Atlanta mainly because of the Hurricane Katrina thing.Being on or near the water is definately nicer when there are no crazy weather patterns.Not to mention that it is closer to other large cities.
#4
Posted 08 March 2007 - 11:41 AM
I believe the MSA is the more accurate way of showing how big a city is. I think Atlanta will pass Houston in both instances even if Fulton county's population never gets larger than 600,000.
#5
Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:11 PM
Beside the point, but Fulton's population is over 900,000.













