The Scottsdale thread
#1
Posted 16 June 2006 - 10:50 AM
A couple of quick Scottsdale facts
The city is 185 mi sq
and was estimated to have 221,000 residents as of 2004.
Can someone shed a little light on this community for me?
#2
Posted 16 June 2006 - 12:03 PM
It's an interesting mix of things though, I think. Downtown has that cowboy-themed area, the West Mall arts area, a baseball stadium and the retail district around the Fashion Square mall. Northern Scottsdale has all of the golf courses and gated communities. There's also quite a few offices there, particularly around the 101 when it's not on the res.
In most of AZ, certainly in Tucson, saying you're from Scottsdale can get you labelled as a snob. Like I said, it just has an elitist reputation. Even though there are some middle class areas in the southern portion, the wealthy stuff overshadows it.
I must say that I enjoyed Taliesin West when I went there. The area around it is also gorgeous. Scottsdale also apparently has the only date store in the area. They grow the dates in Gila Bend, but the store is there. I was on a medjool kick when I first came to AZ, and made it a special point to stop there once.
#3
Posted 16 June 2006 - 10:32 PM
http://www.phxloftne...-view.php?id=45
Camelview is one of the biggest, high profile developments I have ever seen

Hotel Valley Ho rennovation is sick- you should eat at Trader Vic's/ ZuZu sometime or stay there- total MCM.. (pics below at the bottom section)
Safari Drive is right across the street from Camelview-










Portales Place right behind Camelview,
Waterfront just on the other side of Fashion Square- (retail and towers) as well as Main Street Plaza and west a little- Residences on Main..
All high dollar projects...













Edited by loftguy, 16 June 2006 - 10:32 PM.
#4
Posted 16 June 2006 - 11:13 PM
I think Wright was brilliant, but I'm always frustrated with the Arizona architects and their insistence on Wright as being the definitive architect, thus reflecting his ideas heavily upon their designs. I've always thought that, in any art, influences should only be used as a resource and not a reliance. Otherwise, it's just bordering on plagarism.
I've also always been worried about homogeneity in the Valley because of this. I'd rather have no new urban development than a city of structures that all look the same.
Maybe it's just me.
#5
Posted 17 June 2006 - 12:41 AM
#6
Posted 17 June 2006 - 09:18 PM
I think there is a good amount of difference on these projects?
At least it is putting AZ on the map in some way...
#7
Posted 19 June 2006 - 01:28 AM
#8
Posted 19 June 2006 - 01:47 PM
MJLO, on Jun 19 2006, 12:28 AM, said:
I like a lot of the Modernist styles though, especially those which look like they're from the 60's, I guess because they just provide a sort of camp value and nostalgic presence that's distinctly American. This is what originally turned me on to Tucson, actually. There are some shops on the near north side that look like they're right out of 1965, and I like that.
But the design still needs to be tasteful and unique enough so that you can remember it. Homogeneity does no one any good.
What I don't like is that red-brick ranch house that dots every street in many neighborhoods, or those stucco-clad blue or brown/white homes that look like they could have come off of an assembly line.
But maybe in 20 years, those will be nostalgic in the same way Modernism is now.
#9
Posted 20 June 2006 - 12:45 AM
Wow I kinda derailed the Scottsdale thread there didn't I? My Question about Scottsdale, is what is the long term plan for the city? Do they have one? Are they happy enough walling themselves off from the rest of the valley and pretending like we dont exist. That's kind of how it feels when they don't support a metro line, and refuse to make themselves a walkable community. Of all places you'd think that a place that comes off as pretentious would want a light rail corridor, it would do wonders for the "image".
#10
Posted 20 June 2006 - 04:29 AM
Taliesin West is Wright's architecture school and it is in Scottsdale. The original Taliesin is in Wisconsin.
#11
Posted 20 June 2006 - 09:04 AM
Inkdaub, on Jun 20 2006, 03:29 AM, said:
MJLO, on Jun 19 2006, 11:45 PM, said:
[edit]
http://www.scottsdal...lan/Default.asp
Also found this in their plans regarding Downtown wi-fi:
"WildFire will charge user fees ranging from $3.75 per hour to $29 per month for standard service, or $39.85 monthly for enhanced service with greater speed. Users will be able to gain free access to Web sites operated by the city, Scottsdale Area Chamber of Commerce, Scottsdale Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Scottsdale Unified School District."
I'm really sick of corporations trying to make a small fortune off of wi-fi. It makes no sense: the infrastructure is ridiculously cheap, and you most likely already have an internet connection. Not to gloat, but Downtown Tucson has had two free, public wi-fi hotspots for almost a year now.
[/edit]
That's a good point. I never thought about the whole image thing. I think Scottsdale would be happier with something flashier, like a big ol' monorail (cue Simpsons monorail song).
I still think it's the fear of bringing in those dirty Phoenix people from Downtown and the north side, which is what kills a lot of transit expansion proposals. I mean, Valley Metro barely even has bus service into Scottsdale, and I'm sure that's there just so that their maids can get to work (whoops, did i just type that?).
Maybe Scottsdale will open its own line eventually, with one indirect connection to the rest of the system. I can certainly see that happening.
Edited by colin, 20 June 2006 - 09:51 AM.
#12
Posted 22 June 2006 - 11:52 AM
In 2000, Scottsdale was 92.2% white. That has to be close to a record.
BTW, of the 9 AZ cities with 100,000+ people in 2000 (including Gilbert), Tucson had the lowest with 70% white.
Source
[edit]
Had to add that Livonia, MI is apparently widely considered the "Whitest City in America" and had over 95% white population in 2000. So, Scottsdale's certainly close and has something to strive for, which is actually kinda sad.
[/edit]
Edited by colin, 22 June 2006 - 11:55 AM.
#13
Posted 22 June 2006 - 12:37 PM
The Phoenix area is different since, it's growth came after the manufacturing boom of the beggining of last century. There are very few African-Americans in this area. It's pretty much all latino. I can see Scottsdale being segregated. I can also see the city government touting that as it's motto to attract more arrogant "WASP's"
#14
Posted 28 June 2006 - 12:25 AM
I saw this on "The Daily Show" tonight and was especially interested by the fact that it's in Scottsdale.
It's a Vegas-based chain serving upscale Tex Mex. Sounds like a good fit in Scottsdale, except for the name. It's certainly funny that people want it changed though.
#15
Posted 28 June 2006 - 09:52 PM
#16
Posted 29 June 2006 - 04:25 PM
#17
Posted 30 June 2006 - 12:53 AM
Look for link to Ed Helms - title is Box Lunch.
Scottsdale is amazing...
I live in Tempe but my heart is in Old Town. The club scene (nightlife) is amazing... Shopping galore...
This may sound very caddy and immateur, but the chicks in Scottsdale are smoking...
If you try to quote me on that I'll deny it!
Anyways- I think Scottsdale has a bad wrap- like L.A.-
That is usually just a sign of a trendy, fast paced city... And let's not forget the $$$ flowing through!
Lots of great schools, most of the cool development is in Old Town...
-Just my opinion though...
#18
Posted 30 June 2006 - 01:56 AM
#19
Posted 30 June 2006 - 11:16 AM
-We call them $30,000 millioniares.
It may be worse than you think!!! Trust me- I go out a lot...
-And the gym's (especially LA Fitness on Scottsdale rd and McDowell) are a social event- girls wear makeup...
But there are so many compensating factors!!
You should go to Old Town one night and bounce around- it's fun...
#20
Posted 30 June 2006 - 11:19 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













