Jump to content


- - - - -

What Columbia is doing right & what can be improved upon


  • Please log in to reply
130 replies to this topic

#41 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:27 PM

That's true. Were the Barringer and Palmetto buildings used for office space prior to conversion?

 

#42 emerging.me

emerging.me

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,225 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:43 PM

View Postkrazeeboi, on Aug 2 2006, 12:27 AM, said:

That's true. Were the Barringer and Palmetto buildings used for office space prior to conversion?

Yup, they were. A good point!

#43 NcSc74

NcSc74

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 941 posts
  • Location:Ex-pat of Fayetteville NC

Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:57 PM

View Postwaccamatt, on Jul 26 2006, 09:17 PM, said:

Why do u need street lights on freeways? That's what you have headlights for; there's no pedestrian traffic.
I used to be a big time freeway lighting fan. I thought that if your city had a lot of them it makes the place feel BIG. However after my trip to San Diego and LA ast weekend I have changed my position. There aren't  that many freeway lights. In the city propers there are lights but once you leave the city centers it is just as dark there as it is in other cities in the Carolinas.

Edited by NcSc74, 01 August 2006 - 10:57 PM.


#44 waccamatt

waccamatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 3,824 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 02 August 2006 - 12:27 AM

View Postkrazeeboi, on Aug 1 2006, 10:27 PM, said:

That's true. Were the Barringer and Palmetto buildings used for office space prior to conversion?

Yes, all three of the buildings I listed were/are used for office space so the occupancy rate will go up even more than the normal rate of absorption.

#45 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 02 August 2006 - 01:34 AM

Cool. Well then SCANA needs to bring it on!

#46 CorgiMatt

CorgiMatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,934 posts
  • Location:Columbia, South Carolina

Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:40 AM

View Postkrazeeboi, on Aug 1 2006, 08:34 PM, said:

^My thoughts exactly.

As far as SCANA goes, if they build a new tower, the CBD's vacancy rate would increase. I don't think we want to see a situation in which firms are simply transferring towers. That does nothing for net absorption.
But someone in the know who is in a negotiating position told me that the building they are in no longer suits them.

#47 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 02 August 2006 - 12:42 PM

^All the more reason for SCANA to partner with Holder Properties to build a new, 425-ft mixed-use tower.

#48 waccamatt

waccamatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 3,824 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 02 August 2006 - 06:56 PM

View Postkrazeeboi, on Aug 2 2006, 12:42 PM, said:

^All the more reason for SCANA to partner with Holder Properties to build a new, 425-ft (600 ft, 42 story) :) mixed-use tower.


#49 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 02 August 2006 - 07:52 PM

Wow, talk about thinking big. :D

#50 distortedlogic

distortedlogic

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,481 posts

Posted 04 August 2006 - 04:02 PM

View Postkrazeeboi, on Aug 2 2006, 07:52 PM, said:

Wow, talk about thinking big. :D

It may not be too crazy, Norfolk is proposing a 35-40 story tower. If they can do it, one of the SC cities can too.

#51 sonofaque86

sonofaque86

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,357 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 04 August 2006 - 04:10 PM

so where is SCANA thinkin about moving? how big would the place be out of DT?

#52 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 07 August 2006 - 02:00 AM

Somewhere in Lexington County, it's rumored.

After having recently returned from DC, I have to stress Columbia's focus on neighborhoods as a good thing. DC is really an awesome city, in that you don't find all of the city's urban activity downtown. As a matter of fact, for nightlife, I'd rather do the Adams Morgan, Dupont Circle, or U Street neighborhoods than downtown. I know cities are really investing in their cores right now, and rightfully so--but the vast majority of the city's residents will be found in the neighborhoods, so they should get a piece of the action. Right now, we can see this happening with Olympia. I really do hope that turns into a nightlife hotspot, eventually connecting to the stadium area, which will be its own center of activity with the condo projects going up in that area.

#53 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 07 August 2006 - 09:01 AM

This is true. DC is a different animal though. DC's downtown is centered around the big tourist things and large government buildings. That sort of forces the more typical downtown activies out a little bit. That said, the neighborhood entertainment areas are definitely something Columbia should focus on over time.

#54 803metlife

803metlife

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 664 posts
  • Location:The Metro,S.C.

Posted 07 August 2006 - 04:16 PM

View PostSpartan, on Aug 7 2006, 10:01 AM, said:

This is true. DC is a different animal though. DC's downtown is centered around the big tourist things and large government buildings. That sort of forces the more typical downtown activies out a little bit. That said, the neighborhood entertainment areas are definitely something Columbia should focus on over time.
I love D.C. and it's nightlife.  If charleston could have kept the capital D.C. would've been a great city to follow.

#55 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 06 October 2006 - 12:08 AM

One thing that I mentioned in the first post in this thread that Columbia could (and should) improve upon is regional cooperation, specifically cooperation with Richland County, and recent happenings have demonstrated this.

First, the failure of the city to collaborate with the county concerning an animal shelter. This goes hand-in-hand with consolidating some city and county services, or at least having them under the same roof.

Secondly is the claim byRichland County Council that the city is leaving it out of decisions on serving the homeless. After pledging $100,000 toward the center, county leaders say they’ve been left out of the planning for the center and are dismayed the city has deviated from a regional blueprint on addressing homelessness. “We’re very confused over the current status and we’re not prepared to move in any direction,” said Greg Pearce, a member of Richland County Council. “We’re waiting for the city to give us some guidance on where they’re going with all of this.”

Also, I have yet to see the city of Columbia take a lead in addressing the problems with the bus system. Everything I've heard thus far has been coming from Richland County.

#56 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 11 October 2006 - 10:01 PM

The bus system is a regional transit authority and the Central Midlands COG operates it, so its really up to them to take the lead in getting things moving.

#57 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:24 AM

This op-ed piece in The State says that the bickering between the city and the county could do damage to Innovista's efforts to to lure investors, workers, and companies. I never thought of this as a possible consequence of the lack of regional cooperation, but it's a rather significant one (goes back to my first point about what can be improved upon).

#58 kayman

kayman

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,168 posts
  • Location:Birmingham

Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:39 PM

View Postkrazeeboi, on Dec 14 2006, 02:24 AM, said:

This op-ed piece in The State says that the bickering between the city and the county could do damage to Innovista's efforts to to lure investors, workers, and companies. I never thought of this as a possible consequence of the lack of regional cooperation, but it's a rather significant one (goes back to my first point about what can be improved upon).

Lack of regional cooperation can do wonders to your region in bad ways with unlimited possiblities.  Trust me, I should know because I live in a region that suffers from this very fact.  Columbia and Richland County needs to put aside their differences before it begins a spiral of events that will lead to factionalism of the Midlands region.

#59 Captain Worley

Captain Worley

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,159 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC area

Posted 19 December 2006 - 06:55 AM

I saw in the paper today that USC wants to buy the Dunbar Funeral Home/Whaley house.  I swear, if current trend continues, by 2025, every building in downtown Columbia will be a condo or owned by USC.

Or both. : :) :

#60 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,467 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 19 December 2006 - 03:06 PM

That area of downtown is certainly more USC-dominated.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users