What Columbia is doing right & what can be improved upon
#41
Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:27 PM
#43
Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:57 PM
waccamatt, on Jul 26 2006, 09:17 PM, said:
Edited by NcSc74, 01 August 2006 - 10:57 PM.
#44
Posted 02 August 2006 - 12:27 AM
krazeeboi, on Aug 1 2006, 10:27 PM, said:
Yes, all three of the buildings I listed were/are used for office space so the occupancy rate will go up even more than the normal rate of absorption.
#45
Posted 02 August 2006 - 01:34 AM
#46
Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:40 AM
krazeeboi, on Aug 1 2006, 08:34 PM, said:
As far as SCANA goes, if they build a new tower, the CBD's vacancy rate would increase. I don't think we want to see a situation in which firms are simply transferring towers. That does nothing for net absorption.
#47
Posted 02 August 2006 - 12:42 PM
#49
Posted 02 August 2006 - 07:52 PM
#51
Posted 04 August 2006 - 04:10 PM
#52
Posted 07 August 2006 - 02:00 AM
After having recently returned from DC, I have to stress Columbia's focus on neighborhoods as a good thing. DC is really an awesome city, in that you don't find all of the city's urban activity downtown. As a matter of fact, for nightlife, I'd rather do the Adams Morgan, Dupont Circle, or U Street neighborhoods than downtown. I know cities are really investing in their cores right now, and rightfully so--but the vast majority of the city's residents will be found in the neighborhoods, so they should get a piece of the action. Right now, we can see this happening with Olympia. I really do hope that turns into a nightlife hotspot, eventually connecting to the stadium area, which will be its own center of activity with the condo projects going up in that area.
#53
Posted 07 August 2006 - 09:01 AM
#54
Posted 07 August 2006 - 04:16 PM
Spartan, on Aug 7 2006, 10:01 AM, said:
#55
Posted 06 October 2006 - 12:08 AM
First, the failure of the city to collaborate with the county concerning an animal shelter. This goes hand-in-hand with consolidating some city and county services, or at least having them under the same roof.
Secondly is the claim byRichland County Council that the city is leaving it out of decisions on serving the homeless. After pledging $100,000 toward the center, county leaders say they’ve been left out of the planning for the center and are dismayed the city has deviated from a regional blueprint on addressing homelessness. “We’re very confused over the current status and we’re not prepared to move in any direction,” said Greg Pearce, a member of Richland County Council. “We’re waiting for the city to give us some guidance on where they’re going with all of this.”
Also, I have yet to see the city of Columbia take a lead in addressing the problems with the bus system. Everything I've heard thus far has been coming from Richland County.
#56
Posted 11 October 2006 - 10:01 PM
#57
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:24 AM
#58
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:39 PM
krazeeboi, on Dec 14 2006, 02:24 AM, said:
Lack of regional cooperation can do wonders to your region in bad ways with unlimited possiblities. Trust me, I should know because I live in a region that suffers from this very fact. Columbia and Richland County needs to put aside their differences before it begins a spiral of events that will lead to factionalism of the Midlands region.
#59
Posted 19 December 2006 - 06:55 AM
Or both. :
#60
Posted 19 December 2006 - 03:06 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













