One Beale
#41
Posted 10 August 2006 - 08:45 PM
#42
Posted 11 August 2006 - 07:26 AM
http://www.commercia...4908663,00.html
You know, I don't want to go off on a rant here, but good grief, it's that kind of thinking which has given us a downtown which has had one class A office building constructed in the past 21 years. Just when we're finally, maybe starting to turn a corner, people such as these who actually have some pull in city politics try to reduce the scale of the project or even eliminate it. One Beale can only improve the real estate values downtown, and who knows, Tigrett just might have the money to buy one of the new condos.
Enough of that; at least the article has a decent rendering of the project and the print edition even has a rendering of the St. Mary's project in North Downtown. It's a decent looking tower.
#43
Posted 11 August 2006 - 07:36 AM
jmduke, on Aug 11 2006, 08:26 AM, said:
You meant to say - a great rendering right? LOL
Glad it came out - we've been sitting on it since Monday. Actually thought it was going to show up in the Thursday article. News 3 showed the video clip that we created for the website last night at 10 as well.
#44
Posted 11 August 2006 - 07:58 AM
gaushell, on Aug 11 2006, 08:36 AM, said:
I was 1/2 referring to the St. Mary's rendering. Not much detail in the small black-and-white picture the print edition had. Unfortunately the online edition didn't have the St. Mary's picture and only a small rendering of the One Beale. When are we going to see a great, er, fantastic, 800x600 or better picture on the website?
#45
Posted 11 August 2006 - 08:04 AM
http://memphis.bizjo...tml?jst=b_ln_hl
If that's the case (if Tigrett and Co. don't kill it), Clobber, Dale, and Memphica can rest easy and the high heels can thankfully stay put
#46
Posted 11 August 2006 - 08:31 AM
#47
Posted 11 August 2006 - 08:53 AM
#48
Posted 11 August 2006 - 10:20 AM
Sorry about the rant.
#49
Posted 11 August 2006 - 12:36 PM
Edit-Another article on One Beale w/ rendering for those of you who don't have CA registration...
http://www.memphisfl...t?oid=oid:18488
The supporters of this project are Office of Planning and Development staff and the Center City Commission and I believe their opinions would be the only one that counts in the end.
Edited by Bears, 11 August 2006 - 12:45 PM.
#50
Posted 11 August 2006 - 02:09 PM
jmduke, on Aug 11 2006, 08:58 AM, said:
What did the St. Mary's rendering look like?
And the only compromise I would encourage would be to maybe back One Beale away from the tracks. It looks like it abuts it. Maybe if the property allows it, push it toward Front? I remember someone saying that Carlisle owned the parking lot by Front west from the Orpheum. Same height, maybe preserves more views? The prob with Waterford is that it's built against Front, and there's that parking lot between it and the tracks. That's available, developable land that is wasted, and with projects like this, they will suffer b/c of it.
Under no condition would I want the project shrunk.
Edited by Clobber, 11 August 2006 - 02:13 PM.
#51
Posted 11 August 2006 - 02:47 PM
Clobber, on Aug 11 2006, 03:09 PM, said:
And the only compromise I would encourage would be to maybe back One Beale away from the tracks. It looks like it abuts it. Maybe if the property allows it, push it toward Front? I remember someone saying that Carlisle owned the parking lot by Front west from the Orpheum. Same height, maybe preserves more views? The prob with Waterford is that it's built against Front, and there's that parking lot between it and the tracks. That's available, developable land that is wasted, and with projects like this, they will suffer b/c of it.
Under no condition would I want the project shrunk.
Clobber, there is a pretty nice rendering of the new tower on www.downtownmemphis.com under current projects. I really like the new tower, it actually has a sort of crown on it!!!!
#52
Posted 11 August 2006 - 03:24 PM
memphica, on Aug 11 2006, 03:47 PM, said:
Or click here.
Nice building!
#53
Posted 11 August 2006 - 03:24 PM
I'm sorry, but Memphis needs to tell Tigrett, "Thanks for lighting the bridge, but stop with the Cybill Shephard bit against towers and enjoy your penthouse." People like this are what has held Memphis back for YEARS! A while ago, I mentioned how I was having a discussion about Memphis and how it never got the Atlanta growth partly due to the old cotton families who used their pull to get things in the city to stagnate and in their favor...At least it sounds as though the CCC supports it...hopefully they outweigh the opinion of Pat Kerr...blah. If it goes in the favor of One Beale, I think he should connect the towers just to annoy her...sorry...I'm gonna be mad if it doesn't happen!!!!
#54
Posted 11 August 2006 - 03:55 PM
#55
Posted 11 August 2006 - 05:08 PM
PHofKS, on Aug 11 2006, 04:24 PM, said:
Thanks. That's pretty effin sweet. 27-story oval cylinder. Modern design. Something of a crown. Exactly the kind of thing downtown needs to diversify its skyline. That, along with One Beale if it goes as planned will really complement the current historic structures we have.
#56
Posted 11 August 2006 - 05:12 PM
PHofKS, on Aug 11 2006, 04:24 PM, said:
That is not the current design.
Sorry that I can't post it yet. I don't know why the CA didn't post a larger version - even the online version was tiny. When we are allowed to post it I'll let you know..
The one at the Memphis Flyer is current but still small
http://www.memphisfl...building001.jpg
Edited by gaushell, 12 August 2006 - 01:29 PM.
#57
Posted 12 August 2006 - 12:01 AM
About the neighborhood opposition to One Beale...Come on guys. Carlisle has essentially split the original One Beale design in two. Wasn't the space b/t the 2 towers facilitated by the revised plan so as not to completely obstruct views from surrounding buildings? I could be wrong. I was under the impression that the increase in height came partly from the architects' need to incorporate such a viewing space. Give Gene Carlisle a break! Waterford residents will still enjoy amazing views of the river. This isn't even about the height. This is about keeping our downtown momentum from taking another blow (and a big one at that) from the fists of people like Tigrett. No offense.
What's FFoR's take on this? I wouldn't be surprised to see Virginia McLean allign her organization w/ Tigrett so she can have even more friends. FFoR has already foiled many of RDC's grand visions for DT (though I wouldn't argue that the RDC's plans didn't have some shortcomings as well). Either way, I'm looking forward to future large-scale projects like One Beale where the various powers-that-be in Memphis are more unified in their vision for Downtown. But first, let's get this baby rollin!
Edited by bluff2085, 12 August 2006 - 01:05 AM.
#58
Posted 12 August 2006 - 12:51 PM
Off Topic: I read somewhere that it was proposed that Memphis would get a jumbo tron; I just wanted to know if anyone else has read or heard this as well?
#59
Posted 12 August 2006 - 01:20 PM
AmandaHugginkiss, on Aug 12 2006, 01:51 PM, said:
Off Topic: I read somewhere that it was proposed that Memphis would get a jumbo tron; I just wanted to know if anyone else has read or heard this as well?
A couple of years ago they were talking about putting a large New York Style one up by Peabody place somewhere. Hopefully it is still in the works.
#60
Posted 12 August 2006 - 01:42 PM
AmandaHugginkiss, on Aug 12 2006, 02:51 PM, said:
http://www.memphisda...s.aspx?id=93405
I hope this won't be tacky. There are a few digital screens near Peabody Place and atop the Rock and Soul Museum at Fedex Fourm. Peabody Place could become a "Times Square" of sorts for Memphis. IMO its the most attractive intersection in the entire state.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













