General Tucson Thread
#121
Posted 16 August 2007 - 02:07 PM
#122
Posted 17 August 2007 - 08:04 PM
colin, on Aug 15 2007, 01:51 PM, said:
But isn't that exactly the point of these comparisons? I think city leaders know Tucson is nothing like Portland and never will be. Tucson IS at a crossroads where it needs to examine it's approach to growth, and Portland represents 1 alternative to business as usual. I too hope Tucson stays Tucson, but the way things are going I am afraid Tucson will be overshadowed by Marana et al.
#123
Posted 17 August 2007 - 11:41 PM
Thought you had left us like the moderator.
I think I resent those comparisons because, when you look at Portland and what they've done as a community, it makes Tucson look so bad. I mean, the fact that our metropolitan area has places like Marana in the first place makes it look bad.
Portland has its own issues though.
#124
Posted 21 August 2007 - 03:50 PM
Pretty cool!
#125
Posted 21 August 2007 - 06:24 PM
colin, on Aug 21 2007, 04:50 PM, said:
Pretty cool!
#126
Posted 21 August 2007 - 07:42 PM
I went back to NOLA for the first time since Katrina last month with my dad on a business trip and it was pretty depressing. Nothing's quite the same and there are still lots of abandoned homes and businesses, especially in New Orleans East. Not sure what's going to happen there.
But you're right, great deal! Even the non-stop to IAH has gone down in price. TUS is just a good place to fly out of now.
#127
Posted 21 August 2007 - 10:16 PM
i've been back to N.O. a couple of times since Katrina, having also spent a week there just before it hit. it's surreal - the parts that don't seem the same really, really don't seem the same - as in permanent change / destruction / reorientation of the city's traffic, land use, infrastructure, etc.
but the parts that do seem the same - the quarter, frenchman street & environs (just east of the esplanade), riverward parts of canal and the CBD, the southern portion of the garden district, etc. - seem untouched. the contrast between these areas and the devastated ones is just jarring, no matter how familiar with the city you think you are. residents must feel the bipolarity in a way i can't pretend to imagine - as though a deformed, mutated evil twin of the city came along and tried to usurp the same space, and succeeded in most places. (okay, i tried anyway to imagine it with that weirdo analogy.)
but yeah, tucson in general!
Edited by convulso, 21 August 2007 - 10:18 PM.
#128
Posted 24 August 2007 - 08:36 AM
I was interested in this because of the "mixed-use" concept. Not sure how mixed-use it will be.
But this corner is essentially dead right now but has a ginormous potential.
#129
Posted 19 September 2007 - 02:21 PM
I still don't think that the traffic is really that bad here. But I'm riding the bus into work every day now (go Sun Tran!).
#130
Posted 04 October 2007 - 03:59 AM
#131
Posted 04 October 2007 - 08:41 AM
In the morning it's very convenient. Buses run almost like clockwork and about every 15 minutes.
The closer you get to Downtown, the easier it is to get around by bus. Once you start having to transfer, that's when SunTran's system falls on its face.
The RTA is supposed to invest money in the bus system. Several new express routes and added buses to existing lines.
http://newwebsite.pa...ptember2006.pdf (page 39)
http://newwebsite.pa...istsAmended.pdf (page 40)
#132
Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:47 PM
Towns learned hard way: Lack of early planning hurt
Sahuarita residents miss city amenities
The latter preaches the same old sprawl saga: let's move out to the suburbs to get away from the city... uh-oh, what happened to the supermarket and restaurants down the street?
The problem here is the haphazard manner in which this sort of development is executed: building only to meet needs usually involves little, if any, planning.
#133
Posted 18 November 2007 - 12:44 AM
anyway, it was cool to see the fans' enthusiasm over bumping off a no. 2 team. WTG wildcats.
Edited by convulso, 19 November 2007 - 02:07 AM.
#134
Posted 18 November 2007 - 09:58 AM
This Thursday game caused unbelievable issues though. Most of the parking lots remotely close to the stadium were shut off to valid permit holders for the entire day, enforced by citations and towing. UA President Robert Shelton sent out a campus-wide email asking staff to leave at 3, but also said that they would have to use vacation or sick time to make it up. He also did not cancel classes around the time of the game.
It bothers me that there was all of this disruption, not really for the game parking itself, but for the f'in tailgating parties, which makes Parking & Transportation Services (my former employer, btw) tons of money since those passes go for $100 or so even in the outlying lots away from the Mall.
#135
Posted 09 December 2007 - 06:03 PM
Arizona Daily Star
December 9, 2007
Quote
With plan amendments adopted by the county's Planning and Zoning Commission on Nov. 28, Pima County is headed in this direction. If the supervisors vote favorably on Tuesday — as they should — it will be proof that progressive thinking has triumphed. It will mean that future generations in this area will not face the severe air pollution problems that Phoenix and Los Angeles are struggling to correct.
#136
Posted 18 December 2007 - 09:25 AM
This is good news, as the county has always been slightly more open to developers than the city, and the sort of stupid, tract housing sprawl that embodies it was able to exist by just building outside the city limits.
Now we just need to get our surrounding counties on board (look at you, Pinal County).
#137
Posted 28 March 2008 - 10:00 AM
Of the Tucson-area corridors, this only leaves the Sandario Road alignment on the west side of the Tucson Mountains, which has a much less likely chance of actually happening than the San Pedro corridor as it abuts Saguaro National Park and the Tohono O'Odham Nation. Residents have also been fervently opposed to it in public meetings, although that should be no surprise. There's another routing which runs adjacent to the Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness, which is regarded among many local naturalists as the holy grail of natural areas and attracts visitors from around the world. I don't think that that one has even been discussed.
The question now is: where is this thing going to be built? My only guess is that they will eventually somehow route it through Safford and far away from Tucson. Otherwise, it's just not going to happen.
Oh, and you can read about the whole thing on this ADOT site:
http://tpd.azdot.gov...g/i10bypass.php
Edited by colin, 28 March 2008 - 10:02 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













